×

Environment Stats: compare key data on French Polynesia & Netherlands

Definitions

STAT French Polynesia Netherlands HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 33
Ranked 28th. 8 times more than Netherlands
4
Ranked 182nd.
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 27
Ranked 77th. 2 times more than Netherlands
13
Ranked 144th.
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 0.0
Ranked 206th.
3
Ranked 170th.
CO2 emissions > Kt 692.31 kt
Ranked 158th.
140,893.6 kt
Ranked 28th. 204 times more than French Polynesia

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 2.79 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 94th.
8.68 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 39th. 3 times more than French Polynesia

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 2.79 kt
Ranked 91st.
8.68 kt
Ranked 35th. 3 times more than French Polynesia

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt 883.75
Ranked 158th.
182,077.55
Ranked 29th. 206 times more than French Polynesia

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 3.3
Ranked 94th.
10.96
Ranked 23th. 3 times more than French Polynesia

Current issues NA water pollution in the form of heavy metals, organic compounds, and nutrients such as nitrates and phosphates; air pollution from vehicles and refining activities; acid rain
Emissions > CO2 emissions > Metric tons per capita 3.07
Ranked 91st.
10.57
Ranked 24th. 3 times more than French Polynesia

Endangered species > Bird species 32
Ranked 24th. 16 times more than Netherlands
2
Ranked 178th.

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 1
Ranked 187th.
4
Ranked 150th. 4 times more than French Polynesia
Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 4.09 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 85th. 18 times more than Netherlands
0.224 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 176th.

Proportion of land area under protection 1.98%
Ranked 197th.
19.54%
Ranked 70th. 10 times more than French Polynesia

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 100
Ranked 6th. The same as Netherlands
100
Ranked 32nd.

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 13
Ranked 114th. 18% more than Netherlands
11
Ranked 135th.
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 47
Ranked 43th.
0.0
Ranked 196th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 3.3
Ranked 94th.
10.96
Ranked 23th. 3 times more than French Polynesia

Forest area > Sq. km 1,050 km²
Ranked 156th.
3,650 km²
Ranked 141st. 3 times more than French Polynesia

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 97.12
Ranked 61st.
100
Ranked 33th. 3% more than French Polynesia

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kt 806.08
Ranked 149th.
173,102.02
Ranked 26th. 215 times more than French Polynesia

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 100
Ranked 5th. The same as Netherlands
100
Ranked 32nd.

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 47
Ranked 52nd.
0.0
Ranked 209th.
Biodiversity > Number 4.57
Ranked 54th. 27 times more than Netherlands
0.17
Ranked 173th.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 4.57
Ranked 55th. 27 times more than Netherlands
0.17
Ranked 177th.

Emissions > CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 US$ of GDP $0.19
Ranked 174th.
$0.39
Ranked 139th. 2 times more than French Polynesia

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources > Total > Billion cubic meters 10
Ranked 121st.
11
Ranked 118th. 10% more than French Polynesia

Freshwater > Renewable internal freshwater resources per capita > Cubic meters 37,636.15
Ranked 19th. 56 times more than Netherlands
668.87
Ranked 136th.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 7
Ranked 163th.
1,948
Ranked 15th. 278 times more than French Polynesia
CO2 emissions > Kg per 2000 PPP $ of GDP 0.11 kg/PPP$
Ranked 150th.
0.3 kg/PPP$
Ranked 91st. 3 times more than French Polynesia

Proportion of land and marine area under protection 0.11%
Ranked 212th.
31.48%
Ranked 20th. 285 times more than French Polynesia

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 17.39
Ranked 10th. 1679 times more than Netherlands
0.0104
Ranked 189th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.12%
Ranked 55th.
100%
Ranked 32nd. 3% more than French Polynesia

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 100
Ranked 10th. The same as Netherlands
100
Ranked 43th.

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 4.12 km²
Ranked 84th. 18 times more than Netherlands
0.224 km²
Ranked 172nd.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 148
Ranked 156th.
36,747
Ranked 26th. 248 times more than French Polynesia
Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 0.0
Ranked 127th.
1.53
Ranked 36th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > Kt 0.0
Ranked 127th.
25,441.65
Ranked 35th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 0.0
Ranked 133th.
5.4
Ranked 11th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > Kt 0.0
Ranked 133th.
89,793.83
Ranked 17th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt per 1000 3.3
Ranked 51st.
3.94
Ranked 37th. 19% more than French Polynesia

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 8
Ranked 73th. 33% more than Netherlands
6
Ranked 86th.
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 97.12
Ranked 67th.
100
Ranked 35th. 3% more than French Polynesia

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > Current US$ $448.08 million
Ranked 105th.
$122.17 billion
Ranked 14th. 273 times more than French Polynesia

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 0.0814%
Ranked 158th.
61.82%
Ranked 6th. 760 times more than French Polynesia

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 0.635
Ranked 91st.
2.32
Ranked 31st. 4 times more than French Polynesia
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 116th.
$17.87 billion
Ranked 29th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 72nd.
0.0
Ranked 157th.

Forest area > % of land area 28.69% of land area
Ranked 96th. 3 times more than Netherlands
10.77% of land area
Ranked 145th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.11%
Ranked 167th.
0.16%
Ranked 142nd. 45% more than French Polynesia

Climate change > CO2 emissions from solid fuel consumption > % of total 0.0
Ranked 127th.
13.97%
Ranked 62nd.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > Kt 883.75
Ranked 152nd.
65,419.28
Ranked 29th. 74 times more than French Polynesia

Climate change > CO2 emissions from gaseous fuel consumption > % of total 0.0
Ranked 133th.
49.32%
Ranked 17th.

Climate change > CO2 emissions from liquid fuel consumption > % of total 100%
Ranked 9th. 3 times more than Netherlands
35.93%
Ranked 156th.

Total natural resources rents > % of GDP 0.0
Ranked 176th.
1.07%
Ranked 120th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 102nd.
0.0
Ranked 188th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > % of GNI 0.0
Ranked 111th.
2.04%
Ranked 50th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Consumption of fixed capital > % of GNI 13%
Ranked 44th.
13.92%
Ranked 20th. 7% more than French Polynesia

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 8.87%
Ranked 54th. 16 times more than Netherlands
0.541%
Ranked 124th.

Adjusted savings > Carbon dioxide damage > % of GNI 0.11% of GNI
Ranked 172nd.
0.16% of GNI
Ranked 146th. 45% more than French Polynesia

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.12
Ranked 55th.
100
Ranked 32nd. 3% more than French Polynesia

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 0.08%
Ranked 124th.
3.08%
Ranked 48th. 39 times more than French Polynesia
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 1.07%
Ranked 172nd.
19.77%
Ranked 48th. 18 times more than French Polynesia

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Tennessee, United States. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; Food and Agriculture Organisation, AQUASTAT data.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; World Bank staff estimates using data from the United Nations Statistics Division's National Accounts Statistics.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; World Bank staff estimates based on Samuel Fankhauser's ""Valuing Climate Change: The Economics of the Greenhouse"" (1995).; The Changing Wealth of Nations: Measuring Sustainable Development in the New Millennium; United Nations Statistics Division Original html

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×