×

Transport > Maritime > Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments > 1=low to 5=high: Countries Compared

DEFINITION: Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments (1=low to 5=high). Data are from Logistics Performance Index surveys conducted by the World Bank in partnership with academic and international institutions and private companies and individuals engaged in international logistics. 2009 round of surveys covered more than 5,000 country assessments by nearly 1,000 international freight forwarders. Respondents evaluate eight markets on six core dimensions on a scale from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The markets are chosen based on the most important export and import markets of the respondent's country, random selection, and, for landlocked countries, neighboring countries that connect them with international markets. Details of the survey methodology are in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete 2010: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy (2010). Respondents evaluated the ability to track and trace consignments when shipping to the market, on a rating ranging from 1 (very low) to 5 (very high). Scores are averaged across all respondents.

CONTENTS

# COUNTRY AMOUNT DATE GRAPH HISTORY
1 Finland 4.14 2012
2 Netherlands 4.12 2012
3 United States 4.11 2012
4 Denmark 4.1 2012
5 Hong Kong 4.09 2012
6 Singapore 4.07 2012
=7 Belgium 4.05 2012
=7 Germany 4.05 2012
9 Japan 4.03 2012
10 United Kingdom 4 2012
=11 France 3.97 2012
=11 Austria 3.97 2012
Group of 7 countries (G7) average (profile) 3.96 2012
13 Luxembourg 3.91 2012
14 Canada 3.86 2012
=15 South Africa 3.83 2012
=15 Switzerland 3.83 2012
17 Sweden 3.82 2012
18 United Arab Emirates 3.81 2012
19 Australia 3.79 2012
20 Italy 3.73 2012
High income OECD countries average (profile) 3.68 2012
21 South Korea 3.68 2012
Non-religious countries average (profile) 3.68 2012
=22 Norway 3.67 2012
=22 Spain 3.67 2012
24 Ireland 3.65 2012
25 Portugal 3.6 2012
26 New Zealand 3.58 2012
Eurozone average (profile) 3.57 2012
=27 Turkey 3.54 2012
=27 Malaysia 3.54 2012
=29 Hungary 3.52 2012
=29 China 3.52 2012
31 European Union 3.51 2012
European Union average (profile) 3.51 2012
32 Qatar 3.5 2012
NATO countries average (profile) 3.46 2012
=33 Bahrain 3.42 2012
=33 Brazil 3.42 2012
=35 Israel 3.39 2010
=35 Iceland 3.39 2012
37 Cyprus 3.36 2012
38 Poland 3.32 2012
Europe average (profile) 3.3 2012
=39 Philippines 3.3 2012
=39 Argentina 3.3 2012
41 Tunisia 3.25 2012
42 Chile 3.22 2012
Cold countries average (profile) 3.21 2012
43 Saudi Arabia 3.21 2012
=44 Slovenia 3.2 2012
=44 Croatia 3.2 2012
46 Thailand 3.18 2012
47 Czech Republic 3.17 2012
=48 Vietnam 3.16 2012
=48 Bulgaria 3.16 2012
=50 Mexico 3.15 2012
=50 Ukraine 3.15 2012
Emerging markets average (profile) 3.15 2012
=52 Indonesia 3.12 2012
=52 Yemen 3.12 2012
54 Romania 3.1 2012
55 India 3.09 2012
56 Serbia 3.07 2012
57 Malta 3.05 2012
=58 Panama 3.01 2012
=58 Morocco 3.01 2012
60 Estonia 3 2012
61 Peru 2.99 2012
=62 Greece 2.98 2012
=62 Uruguay 2.98 2012
=62 Kuwait 2.98 2012
65 Latvia 2.97 2012
Potential Future EU Members average (profile) 2.93 2012
Eastern Europe average (profile) 2.92 2012
66 Benin 2.87 2012
67 Egypt 2.86 2012
68 Namibia 2.85 2012
Middle Eastern and North Africa average (profile) 2.85 2012
69 Slovakia 2.84 2012
=70 Mauritius 2.83 2012
=70 Kazakhstan 2.83 2012
=72 Bosnia and Herzegovina 2.81 2012
=72 Costa Rica 2.81 2012
=74 Madagascar 2.8 2012
=74 The Gambia 2.8 2012
=74 Guatemala 2.8 2012
Former Spanish colonies average (profile) 2.8 2012
77 Sao Tome and Principe 2.78 2012
=78 Tanzania 2.77 2012
=78 Cambodia 2.77 2012
80 Russia 2.76 2012
81 Azerbaijan 2.75 2012
=82 Botswana 2.73 2012
=82 Lithuania 2.73 2012
=82 Bolivia 2.73 2012
Religious countries average (profile) 2.73 2012
OPEC countries average (profile) 2.69 2012
85 Cote d'Ivoire 2.69 2012
Former Soviet republics average (profile) 2.67 2012
86 Colombia 2.66 2012
=87 The Bahamas 2.65 2012
=87 Albania 2.65 2012
=87 Sri Lanka 2.65 2012
90 Bangladesh 2.64 2010
91 Montenegro 2.62 2012
=92 Lebanon 2.61 2012
=92 Pakistan 2.61 2012
Muslim countries average (profile) 2.61 2012
94 El Salvador 2.6 2012
=95 Georgia 2.59 2012
=95 Paraguay 2.59 2012
=95 Oman 2.59 2012
South Asia average (profile) 2.59 2012
=98 Ecuador 2.58 2012
=98 Belarus 2.58 2012
=98 Guinea-Bissau 2.58 2012
=101 Venezuela 2.57 2012
=101 Armenia 2.57 2012
=103 Malawi 2.56 2012
=103 Bhutan 2.56 2012
=105 Cameroon 2.55 2012
=105 Jordan 2.55 2012
107 Uzbekistan 2.53 2012
=108 Papua New Guinea 2.51 2012
=108 Nicaragua 2.51 2010
110 Zimbabwe 2.5 2012
=111 Dominican Republic 2.49 2012
=111 Laos 2.49 2012
=111 Niger 2.49 2012
=111 Iran 2.49 2012
115 Fiji 2.48 2012
South and Central Asia average (profile) 2.47 2012
Former French colonies average (profile) 2.47 2012
=116 Togo 2.46 2012
=116 Algeria 2.46 2012
118 Uganda 2.45 2010
119 Moldova 2.44 2012
=120 Maldives 2.43 2012
=120 Jamaica 2.43 2012
122 Liberia 2.42 2012
123 Republic of Macedonia 2.41 2012
=124 Rwanda 2.39 2012
=124 Solomon Islands 2.39 2012
=126 Turkmenistan 2.38 2010
=126 Libya 2.38 2012
=128 Republic of the Congo 2.35 2012
=128 Nigeria 2.35 2012
=128 Syria 2.35 2012
=128 Democratic Republic of the Congo 2.35 2012
=128 Zambia 2.35 2010
=128 Honduras 2.35 2012
=134 Kenya 2.34 2012
=134 Burma 2.34 2012
136 Guinea 2.33 2012
failed states average (profile) 2.32 2012
=137 Ghana 2.31 2012
=137 Mali 2.31 2010
=137 Kyrgyzstan 2.31 2012
Sub-Saharan Africa average (profile) 2.29 2007
140 Mongolia 2.29 2012
=141 Mauritania 2.28 2012
=141 Mozambique 2.28 2010
143 Cuba 2.26 2012
=144 Gabon 2.2 2012
=144 Comoros 2.2 2012
146 Haiti 2.15 2012
=147 Sierra Leone 2.14 2012
=147 Guyana 2.14 2012
=149 Burkina Faso 2.13 2012
=149 Tajikistan 2.13 2012
=151 Ethiopia 2.1 2012
=151 Afghanistan 2.1 2012
=151 Senegal 2.1 2012
154 Angola 2 2012
155 Lesotho 1.99 2012
156 Nepal 1.95 2012
157 Sudan 1.89 2012
158 Iraq 1.86 2012
159 Eritrea 1.83 2012
160 Djibouti 1.73 2012
=161 East Timor 1.67 2007
=161 Burundi 1.67 2012
163 Chad 1.57 2012
164 Somalia 1.17 2010

Citation

"Countries Compared by Transport > Maritime > Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments > 1=low to 5=high. International Statistics at NationMaster.com", World Bank and Turku School of Economics, Logistic Performance Index Surveys. Data are available online at : http://www.worldbank.org/lpi. Summary results are published in Arvis and others' Connecting to Compete: Trade Logistics in the Global Economy, The Logistics Performance Index and Its Indicators report. Aggregates compiled by NationMaster. Retrieved from http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Transport/Maritime/Logistics-performance-index:-Ability-to-track-and-trace-consignments/1=low-to-5=high

Transport > Maritime > Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments > 1=low to 5=high: Countries Compared Map

NationMaster

Interesting observations about Transport > Maritime > Logistics performance index: Ability to track and trace consignments > 1=low to 5=high

Follow us on Facebook to get interesting stats: