×

Transport > Quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards: Countries Compared

DEFINITION: Quality of port infrastructure, WEF (1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards). The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).

CONTENTS

# COUNTRY AMOUNT DATE GRAPH HISTORY
=1 Netherlands 6.8 2012
=1 Singapore 6.8 2012
3 Hong Kong 6.5 2012
=4 Panama 6.4 2012
=4 United Arab Emirates 6.4 2012
=6 Finland 6.3 2012
=6 Belgium 6.3 2012
8 Iceland 6.2 2012
=9 Bahrain 6 2012
=9 Germany 6 2012
11 Sweden 5.9 2012
=12 Denmark 5.8 2012
=12 United Kingdom 5.8 2012
=12 Spain 5.8 2012
=15 Canada 5.7 2012
=15 Malta 5.7 2012
=17 Barbados 5.6 2012
=17 Estonia 5.6 2012
=17 United States 5.6 2012
=20 South Korea 5.5 2012
=20 Malaysia 5.5 2012
=20 Luxembourg 5.5 2012
=20 New Zealand 5.5 2012
=24 France 5.4 2012
=24 Norway 5.4 2012
=24 Oman 5.4 2012
=24 Namibia 5.4 2012
Group of 7 countries (G7) average (profile) 5.37 2012
Eurozone average (profile) 5.32 2012
=28 Ireland 5.3 2012
=28 Saudi Arabia 5.3 2012
High income OECD countries average (profile) 5.3 2012
=30 Qatar 5.2 2012
=30 Lithuania 5.2 2012
=30 Slovenia 5.2 2012
=30 Japan 5.2 2012
=30 Chile 5.2 2012
=30 Puerto Rico 5.2 2012
=30 Switzerland 5.2 2012
=37 Australia 5.1 2012
=37 Jamaica 5.1 2012
Non-religious countries average (profile) 5.1 2012
39 European Union 5.03 2012
European Union average (profile) 5.03 2012
=40 Portugal 5 2012
=40 Suriname 5 2012
=40 Cyprus 5 2012
=40 Seychelles 5 2012
NATO countries average (profile) 4.93 2012
=44 Austria 4.9 2012
=44 Uruguay 4.9 2012
=44 Sri Lanka 4.9 2012
=47 Mauritius 4.8 2012
=47 Morocco 4.8 2012
=47 The Gambia 4.8 2012
=47 Latvia 4.8 2012
=51 Dominican Republic 4.7 2012
=51 South Africa 4.7 2012
Europe average (profile) 4.65 2012
=53 Thailand 4.6 2012
=53 Czech Republic 4.6 2012
=53 Cote d'Ivoire 4.6 2012
=53 Honduras 4.6 2012
=53 Tunisia 4.6 2011
=58 Senegal 4.5 2012
=58 Brunei 4.5 2012
Middle Eastern and North Africa average (profile) 4.45 2012
=60 Turkey 4.4 2012
=60 Zimbabwe 4.4 2012
=60 Jordan 4.4 2012
=60 Pakistan 4.4 2012
=60 China 4.4 2012
=65 Georgia 4.3 2012
=65 Mexico 4.3 2012
=67 Swaziland 4.2 2012
=67 Republic of Macedonia 4.2 2012
=67 Greece 4.2 2012
=67 Cambodia 4.2 2012
OPEC countries average (profile) 4.14 2012
=71 Liberia 4.1 2012
=71 Lebanon 4.1 2012
=71 Mali 4.1 2012
=71 Kuwait 4.1 2012
=71 Zambia 4.1 2012
Emerging markets average (profile) 4.04 2012
=76 Slovakia 4 2012
=76 Hungary 4 2012
=76 Ghana 4 2012
=76 Guatemala 4 2012
=76 India 4 2012
=76 Azerbaijan 4 2012
=76 Ukraine 4 2012
=76 Iran 4 2012
=76 Croatia 4 2012
=76 Egypt 4 2012
Former Spanish colonies average (profile) 3.92 2012
=86 Ecuador 3.9 2012
=86 El Salvador 3.9 2012
=86 Italy 3.9 2012
=86 Israel 3.9 2012
=86 Cape Verde 3.9 2012
=91 Trinidad and Tobago 3.8 2012
=91 Kenya 3.8 2012
=91 Uganda 3.8 2012
Potential Future EU Members average (profile) 3.79 2012
=94 Cameroon 3.7 2012
=94 Malawi 3.7 2012
=94 Mauritania 3.7 2012
=94 Botswana 3.7 2012
=94 Albania 3.7 2012
=94 Benin 3.7 2012
=94 Russia 3.7 2012
=94 Bulgaria 3.7 2012
Former Soviet republics average (profile) 3.68 2012
Eastern Europe average (profile) 3.63 2012
=102 Burkina Faso 3.6 2012
=102 Montenegro 3.6 2012
=102 Indonesia 3.6 2012
=102 Nigeria 3.6 2012
=102 Paraguay 3.6 2012
=102 Argentina 3.6 2012
=108 Ethiopia 3.5 2012
=108 Libya 3.5 2012
=108 Guinea 3.5 2012
=108 Rwanda 3.5 2012
=108 Peru 3.5 2012
=108 Poland 3.5 2012
=114 Syria 3.4 2011
=114 Lesotho 3.4 2012
=114 Vietnam 3.4 2012
=114 Mozambique 3.4 2012
=114 Kazakhstan 3.4 2012
=119 Tanzania 3.3 2012
=119 Bangladesh 3.3 2012
=119 Belize 3.3 2011
=119 Sierra Leone 3.3 2012
=119 Philippines 3.3 2012
=119 Bolivia 3.3 2012
=119 Guyana 3.3 2012
=126 Madagascar 3.2 2012
=126 Colombia 3.2 2012
=126 Nicaragua 3.2 2012
=129 Moldova 3 2012
=129 Yemen 3 2012
=129 Mongolia 3 2012
=129 Armenia 3 2012
133 Chad 2.8 2012
=134 East Timor 2.7 2012
=134 Nepal 2.7 2012
=134 Serbia 2.7 2012
=134 Algeria 2.7 2012
=138 Gabon 2.6 2012
=138 Romania 2.6 2012
=138 Brazil 2.6 2012
=138 Burundi 2.6 2012
142 Venezuela 2.5 2012
143 Costa Rica 2.4 2012
144 Angola 2.3 2011
145 Haiti 1.9 2012
=146 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.7 2012
=146 Tajikistan 1.7 2012
148 Kyrgyzstan 1.5 2012

Citation

"Countries Compared by Transport > Quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards. International Statistics at NationMaster.com", World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report. Aggregates compiled by NationMaster. Retrieved from http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Transport/Quality-of-port-infrastructure,-WEF/1=extremely-underdeveloped-to-7=well-developed-and-efficient-by-international-standards

Transport > Quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards: Countries Compared Map

NationMaster

Interesting observations about Transport > Quality of port infrastructure, WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by international standards

Follow us on Facebook to get interesting stats: