×

Transport > Quality of port infrastructure > WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by i: Countries Compared

DEFINITION: The Quality of Port Infrastructure measures business executives' perception of their country's port facilities. Data are from the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey, conducted for 30 years in collaboration with 150 partner institutes. The 2009 round included more than 13,000 respondents from 133 countries. Sampling follows a dual stratification based on company size and the sector of activity. Data are collected online or through in-person interviews. Responses are aggregated using sector-weighted averaging. The data for the latest year are combined with the data for the previous year to create a two-year moving average. Scores range from 1 (port infrastructure considered extremely underdeveloped) to 7 (port infrastructure considered efficient by international standards). Respondents in landlocked countries were asked how accessible are port facilities (1 = extremely inaccessible; 7 = extremely accessible).".

CONTENTS

# COUNTRY AMOUNT DATE GRAPH HISTORY
1 Singapore 6.78 2009
2 Netherlands 6.6 2009
3 Finland 6.45 2009
4 Germany 6.38 2009
5 Belgium 6.34 2009
6 United Arab Emirates 6.24 2009
7 Iceland 6.23 2009
8 Denmark 6.22 2009
9 France 5.89 2009
10 Sweden 5.87 2009
11 Norway 5.79 2009
12 United States 5.67 2009
13 Canada 5.61 2009
14 Estonia 5.6 2009
15 Bahrain 5.55 2009
16 Panama 5.54 2009
=17 Malaysia 5.52 2009
=17 Luxembourg 5.52 2009
19 Barbados 5.49 2009
20 New Zealand 5.47 2009
21 Malta 5.44 2009
22 Namibia 5.42 2009
=23 Puerto Rico 5.4 2009
=23 Switzerland 5.4 2009
Group of 7 countries (G7) average (profile) 5.37 2009
25 Chile 5.36 2009
26 Jamaica 5.27 2009
=27 Slovenia 5.25 2009
=27 Cyprus 5.25 2009
High income OECD countries average (profile) 5.25 2009
Eurozone average (profile) 5.24 2009
29 United Kingdom 5.22 2009
30 Oman 5.19 2009
31 Spain 5.18 2009
32 Japan 5.17 2009
33 Honduras 5.12 2009
34 Qatar 4.99 2009
35 Austria 4.98 2009
36 European Union 4.97 2009
37 Cote d'Ivoire 4.96 2009
European Union average (profile) 4.93 2009
38 Uruguay 4.88 2009
39 Tunisia 4.87 2009
Non-religious countries average (profile) 4.87 2009
40 Brunei 4.83 2009
NATO countries average (profile) 4.82 2009
41 Sri Lanka 4.79 2009
42 Lithuania 4.73 2009
=43 Portugal 4.72 2009
=43 Saudi Arabia 4.72 2009
45 Thailand 4.69 2009
46 The Gambia 4.67 2009
47 South Africa 4.66 2009
48 Australia 4.65 2009
49 Israel 4.59 2009
50 Jordan 4.51 2009
51 Ireland 4.44 2009
52 Senegal 4.43 2009
53 Zimbabwe 4.42 2009
54 Latvia 4.4 2009
=55 Dominican Republic 4.3 2009
=55 Guatemala 4.3 2009
57 Mauritius 4.29 2009
58 China 4.28 2009
59 Morocco 4.24 2009
60 Azerbaijan 4.2 2009
61 El Salvador 4.17 2009
62 Czech Republic 4.16 2009
63 Greece 4.14 2009
64 Slovakia 4.12 2009
65 Kuwait 4.11 2009
66 Ghana 4.04 2009
=67 Burkina Faso 4 2009
=67 Georgia 4 2009
69 Trinidad and Tobago 3.98 2009
70 Pakistan 3.96 2009
71 Hungary 3.93 2009
Emerging markets average (profile) 3.84 2009
=72 Ethiopia 3.77 2009
=72 Mali 3.77 2009
74 Croatia 3.75 2009
75 Turkey 3.74 2009
Former Spanish colonies average (profile) 3.74 2009
76 Botswana 3.72 2009
77 Ukraine 3.71 2009
78 Zambia 3.7 2009
79 Mexico 3.67 2009
80 Italy 3.66 2009
81 Kenya 3.65 2009
82 Argentina 3.64 2009
83 Bulgaria 3.62 2009
84 Russia 3.55 2009
85 Malawi 3.53 2009
86 Cambodia 3.5 2009
=87 Mauritania 3.47 2009
=87 Paraguay 3.47 2009
=87 India 3.47 2009
90 Uganda 3.44 2009
91 Indonesia 3.4 2009
92 Ecuador 3.34 2009
93 Suriname 3.32 2009
94 Benin 3.31 2009
95 Vietnam 3.28 2009
96 Serbia and Montenegro 3.27 2009
=97 Syria 3.26 2009
=97 Romania 3.26 2009
99 Libya 3.25 2009
100 Albania 3.22 2009
=101 Colombia 3.21 2009
=101 Guyana 3.21 2009
103 Mozambique 3.2 2009
104 Burundi 3.09 2009
=105 Madagascar 3.03 2009
=105 Kazakhstan 3.03 2009
107 Philippines 3 2009
=108 Bangladesh 2.98 2009
=108 Lesotho 2.98 2009
110 Bolivia 2.95 2009
111 Mongolia 2.94 2009
112 Armenia 2.91 2009
113 Algeria 2.9 2009
114 Nepal 2.83 2009
=115 Tanzania 2.82 2009
=115 Poland 2.82 2009
117 Nigeria 2.8 2009
118 Cameroon 2.72 2009
119 Nicaragua 2.69 2009
=120 Peru 2.66 2009
=120 Chad 2.66 2009
122 Brazil 2.65 2009
123 Costa Rica 2.57 2009
124 Venezuela 2.42 2009
125 East Timor 2.26 2009
126 Tajikistan 1.94 2009
127 Kyrgyzstan 1.6 2009
128 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.5 2009

Citation

"Countries Compared by Transport > Quality of port infrastructure > WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by i. International Statistics at NationMaster.com", World Economic Forum, Global Competiveness Report. Aggregates compiled by NationMaster. Retrieved from http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Transport/Quality-of-port-infrastructure/WEF/1=extremely-underdeveloped-to-7=well-developed-and-efficient-by-i

Transport > Quality of port infrastructure > WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by i: Countries Compared Map

NationMaster

Interesting observations about Transport > Quality of port infrastructure > WEF > 1=extremely underdeveloped to 7=well developed and efficient by i

Follow us on Facebook to get interesting stats: