peter fredericks
29th March 2012 |
what is needed is a web site where people can volenteer imformation about were they live.what illness they might have,what medications they may be taking or have taken in the past,this way people may be able to work out which polluting factory, medication or food aditive it was that made them ill giving them more chance of a recovery and make who ever is responsable liable also enable us to have maps on all diseases giving us the oppertunity to know were we should or shouldnt be.I dont have the skills to make a website otherwise I would,if enough people read this,maybe in the form of a chain letter,surely someone will take on the challenge.a web site like this would grow to be huge |
peter fredericks
29th March 2012 |
what is needed is somebody to create a website where people can volunteer imformation about were they live and any health problems they have,this way we could have maps on all disease,people will know were to or not to live,and possably be able to make polluting companies liable,this site should include some imformation about diet and what medications people are taking or have taken in the past which would give people a chance to make drug companies liable,it seems profit is there only motive they sell products banned by the f.d.a to third world countries,if they sell a drug that makes us sick they benifit by selling more drugs.I dont have the skills to create a site but if this letter was repeated as a chain letter surely someone woud read it and take on the task a site like this would grow to be huge.I live in toxic town portland,victoria close to alcoa,a stinking smelter and would love to make them liable for the health problems they cause |
Vernie
20th March 2012 |
How many Americans died from cancer in 2005? |
Dominick
20th March 2012 |
If you look at a map of cancer cases in the U.S.most cases are along the Missippi River following the jet stream from the refineries in Texas. |
WTF???
30th September 2011 |
What idiot posts an article with (Most Recent) in the title. Really, this is the most recent? Your comments go back to 2004. |
Open_Eyes
19th July 2011 |
Cueball: It is because of all the food preservatives and chemicals that have been added to our food and water supply. I believe our government is encouraging the use of these chemicals because it makes people sick and weak, and what happens when you get sick and weak? you go to the hospital, the doctor, buy medications that they produce and/or control the amounts of drugs in the medications that is deemed "safe." Look up how much fluoride is in the water supply in the United States, then look up the side effects and that fact that it is not even proven to have a significant effect on our dental health. It is the government, the governments of all the modern countries. SICKNESS PRODUCES MONEY WHICH TURNS THE WHEELS OF THE GLOBAL ECONOMY. It is the government who is approving all these chemicals and preservatives. Take a minute and think what people used to eat hundreds of years ago: There were no preservatives, there were no insecticides, there wasn't fluoride or chlorine in the water there was no economy or for that matter a global economy. It is obvious why people in modern countries are dying of cancer. Think of all chemicals in water, in your food, in the vaccinations you are given when you are 8 weeks old and every year for the rest of your life. The government approves all of this. SICKNESS PRODUCES MONEY.
SAVE YOUR NEIGHBORS, REFORM OUR GOVERNMENT, AMERICA. |
Jebaraj+K.
3rd July 2011 |
What about India? Where are we going toward? |
Carina :)
26th February 2011 |
I need to do a bibliography and i don't know who made this site! |
winona hinkel
2nd February 2011 |
I do not see statistics for Korea on your list. |
bosc
27th January 2011 |
Hey Cueball
The link is entirely in the food. And not in the way that you might think. Its not entirely or even primarily the additives or pestisides that can be found in food. It is the link between meat/milk and to a lesser degree process food that really shed light on itself and the link between food and cancers. Notice the list and what they have in common many are wealthier countries and high meat/milk consuming countries. Thats why you will never see countries like India or China on this list because their consumption levels are too low, many of the rural (poorer) people base their diets around plant based food therefore they have less chronic deiseases like cancer, heart disease (leader killer in north america), parkisans, diabetes and many more. The problem is not many people are willing to give up their high meat/consuming diets but the switch from that to a more plant based not processed food diet doesn't only have the long term benefits of less chronic diseases but the short term effects of higher energy levels; You just look and feel better. When you really think about it what is more fundamental to what happens to our bodies than the food we put into it, it makes sense even on a very logical level. But look into it for yourself. You might want to read a book call "the china study" which is also the name of the longest running dietary examanation of diet and disease. |
bosc
27th January 2011 |
Hey Cueball
The link is entirely in the food. And not in the way that you might think. Its not entirely or even primarily the additives or pesticides that can be found in food. It is the link between meat/milk and to a lesser degree process food that really shed light on itself and the link between food and cancers. Notice the list and what they have in common many are wealthier countries and high meat/milk consuming countries. That's why you will never see countries like India or China on this list because their consumption levels are too low, many of the rural (poorer) people base their diets around plant based food therefore they have less chronic deiseases like cancer, heart disease (leader killer in north america), parkisans, diabetes and many more. The problem is not many people are willing to give up their high meat/consuming diets but the switch from that to a more plant based not processed food diet doesn't only have the long term benefits of less chronic diseases but the short term effects of higher energy levels; You just look and feel better. When you really think about it what is more fundamental to what happens to our bodies than the food we put into it, it makes sense even on a very logical level. But look into it for yourself. |
Lela
23rd December 2010 |
@RickyB
Read the article: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12054984
Yes, Canada has public health care system, and the latest news published in Lancet it exceeds in cancer survival rate along with Australia and Sweden. |
KILLuminati
22nd December 2010 |
look into 'Rife Frequency Generation' |
cueball.
9th December 2010 |
Is there any reason why there is not any real in depth research
into why the cancer rates have exploded in the last 40 years.
Like water supply, food, air pollution, additives. or is it easy just to blame. smoking, or is it down to financial gain.
THERE IS A LINK SOMEWHERE. |
Cate
29th November 2010 |
I have a question. why are there no countries like africa on this list? Do they have a lower possibility of Cancer because they have other diseases, or do they just not know what the statistics are in africa for cancer. |
Emmanuel
26th November 2010 |
I need a world cancer death statistic with projection to 2020! |
Ricky B
23rd November 2010 |
@Carroll C Meyers re: UK national health care vs US . Why did you ignore the fact that the US is superior to The Netherlands, Italy, Hungary, Luxumbourg, Slovakia, Ireland, Czech Republic, and New Zealand ? Do any of those countries have national health care ?
Wouldn't it be best to avoid wildly extrapolating the significance of one graph to advance one's political agenda on a tremendously complex topic ? Wouldn't one want to look at MANY factors ?
Or better yet, let's stick to science and leave political agendas out, including Martha's intolerance of drug companies and pro-choice people. |
Carrol C Myers
9th November 2010 |
This seems to dispel the notion being spread on the internet, that the US is ahead in healthcare, compared to the United Kingdom with their national healthcare program. |
Bogus Alias
6th November 2010 |
What is the ratio of those making a living off cancer
compared to the number of those dying from it? Enquiring mind would like to know. |
Bangash
20th October 2010 |
This is a very sad statistic list, my mother also suffers from this horrible disease.
|
Martha
19th October 2010 |
I wonder if the use of oral contraceptives/abortion in those countries that have a high rate of breast cancer is proportionately high as well. We seem to ignore those studies in the US because of the drug companies and pro choice advocates |
Vince
18th October 2010 |
No, Robert, it isn't.
And pearl jam, that is also wrong. The world statistics for skin cancer are freely available and that is quite clearly false. |
Dr. Parker
30th September 2010 |
If any docters see this, i want to bring something to your attention.... many countries are on there and it showes a few things... but, there is a large country not on the graph....and it doesn't have the best healthcare.... not by a longhsot....its Mexico. It is my proposal that we should all turn our attentions and searches there, we may just find a genetic difference between the world, and the mexicans. And if so, message me at oathark@hotmail.com and together we will find a cure for cancer! |
Heshan
22nd September 2010 |
ppl from western countries eat high protein diets especially a lot of meat and dairy products and its the opposite of that in asian countries, besides in china and japan they green tea almost after every meal which is known to prevent cancer and also helps in many mental illnesses |
Richard Thripp
17th September 2010 |
Cancer is a disease, a chronic metabolic disease akin to other chronic metabolic diseases such as scurvy, night blindness, pellagra & pernicious anemia. No such disease has ever been cured through mechanical manipulation of the body. Where cancer is seated isn't relevant to its cure. The preventative, cure & treatment of this vitamin-deficiency disease is Amygdalin (vitamin B17). People who get at least 100 m.g. of B17 daily cannot contract cancer. |
robert
31st August 2010 |
The reason asian countries are not on the list is due to low meat and dairy consumption. |
CB
25th August 2010 |
The bad news: If a man lives long enough he'll get prostate cancer. The good news: of 100,000 deaths only 322 will be related to it (in the US). Not a major concern imo. |
Yeah Right
21st June 2010 |
I wouldn't trust a websites 411 that can't sort numbers from smallest to largest. |
omg
27th April 2010 |
this gragh is noy right the uk has the highest death toll for cancer not the last |
fred
2nd March 2010 |
I'm surprised that Italy is so high.
Considering that they consume tons of so called cancer fighters.
For example.. cooked tomatoes , garlic and onion. |
Daniel Ofaweye
26th February 2010 |
to Mr. Man, cancer is linked very closely to Diet, Nutrition is a key in cancer, most doctors through training spend no more than a couple of days on nutrition.
Many Africans (i know this cause I've lived in all regions of africa) us the shamans (botanist, scholar & conciousness expert) knowledge of the plants to eliminate cancer.
Cancer is incorrectly viewed as cell mutation when in fact its a fungus that can be cured (literally) the same way you eliminate other fungus'.
research it.....very interesting |
asad
28th January 2010 |
can you give me more information please because i find this helpful and I'm doing my science course work on cancer :( |
Mr Man
1st December 2009 |
David Elliott Lewis, Ph.D. the reason you dont see countries from the 3rd world, like Africa, is because of at least two reasons.
First there life expectancy might be very low and cancer usually shows up in mid to late in life. So people die before cancer gets to them.
Secondly, and more importantly for a list like this is the ability to count the people with cancer. Cancer rates may be very high in an African country but if the people don't know they have it or can not report it due to lack of hospital facilities and/or possibly government interference. The poor souls can't be counted and thus will never show up on a list. |
Michael Z. Williamson
25th November 2009 |
5,350.7 deaths per 1.6 MILLION people--it's an additive property. You add the total of deaths AND the total ratio base.
This graph is very badly done and misleading. |
pearl jam
23rd November 2009 |
AND WHITE PEOPLE ARE 100% MORE LIKELY TO DIE OF SKIN CANCER. PERIOD. |
David Elliott Lewis, Ph.D.
19th November 2009 |
I find it very strange that no countries from Africa, Latin America or Asia (except Japan) are on this list. Why is that? |
ec
14th November 2009 |
This is really great. |
Austin Fifield
29th October 2009 |
I need something that has asia not just the ones you gys like |
Sue
23rd August 2009 |
I read the graph to indicate the number
of deaths. Fewer deaths in UK than
Norway thus the ranking. |
JDR
14th August 2009 |
How are you interpreting the OECD data?
These numbers differ from the OECD Health Data Frequently Requested Data available from their website which you site as the source.
http://www.irdes.fr/EcoSante/DownLoad/OECDHealthData_FrequentlyRequestedData.xls
|
StuRat
18th July 2009 |
Your graph is badly messed up:
1) Your numbers are backwards. That is, the UK should have the worst numbers, not the best.
2) Austria, for some reason, doesn't sort properly. Even though it's rank is 13th, it sorts out between 3 and 4 instead of 12 and 14.
Please fix it. |
maha
20th June 2009 |
i am not satisfied with it..,,,because i have asked to show graphs for mortality rate ,,,overall your findings 4 cancer victims are impressive but not related to my question |
Dellone Pascascio (Lancaster, California)
3rd January 2009 |
I am looking for cancer statistics specifically for Belize. If there are mortality data, and information, if any, on gender specific cancer types. I am also interested on cancer clustering by geographic location. My contact information is dee.pascascio@yahoo.com or bccdangriga @btl.net
Thanks
dp |
cheryl (canada)
11th January 2007 |
I am looking for stats on mortality rates on the most common types of cancer and not U.S. stats I need Canadian stats only. Please help me. |
Faith
4th April 2006 |
Do you have information on cancer deaths in Africa? |
mervyn
9th August 2005 |
statistics of breast cancer incidents in Asia or South East Asia including Philippines |
cindycooke
14th April 2005 |
I want stats about incidence of prostate cancer. |
Kimmy
30th November 2004 |
Why isn't there more countries?!!?!?!?!?
This is so frustrating! |
Desiree Campbell
21st November 2004 |
Do you have maps of lung cancer |
Feeds |
Contact