|
Telecom Order CRTC 97-1078 (933 words) |
 | BC TEL also asserted that it would be prepared to enter into similar facilities exchange arrangements with other carriers, provided they could meet "similar jurisdictional and business practice criteria as those of BC TEL and BCTMC" and could also demonstrate "comparable public benefit in the utilisation of their facilities and networks." |
 | BC TEL also noted that the Agreement is similar in form and purpose to an arrangement entered into between AGT Limited and AGT Mobility Inc. in 1994 (the AGT Agreement), and approved by the Commission in Telecom Order CRTC 94-726 dated 27 June 1994 (Order 94-726). |
 | BC TEL rejected the interveners' assertions regarding the vagueness of its offer to enter into similar arrangements, stating the Agreement was not intended to establish conditions for other agreements and that any proposed arrangements would be considered in the context of the benefits to the Company. |