FACTOID # 128: Peru’s national bird is the Andean cock of the rock (Rupicola peruviana).
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

FACTS & STATISTICS    Simple view

  1. Select countries to view: (hold down Control key and click to select several)

     

     

    Compare:

     

     

  1. Select fact or statistic: (* = graphable)

     

     

     

  2. (OPTIONAL) Compare to statistic: (both need to be graphable)

     

     

     

  3. View result as:

     

       
(OR) SEARCH ALL encyclopedia, stats & forums:   

Encyclopedia > 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the following United States district courts:

It holds court in Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, and Pasadena (and occasionally Anchorage and Honolulu). Its headquarters are in San Francisco.


The Ninth Circuit is also by far the largest Circuit court in the US and it has the largest number of judges, with 28 positions currently authorized for the court (one of which is currently unfilled). Because of its large size, the court rarely sits for a full en banc court of all active judges. Instead, the court provides for a "limited en banc" review of a randomly-selected 11 judge panel. This means that en banc reviews may not actually reflect the views of the majority of the court, and indeed may not include any of the three judges involved in the decision being reviewed in the first place!


The court is considered by some to have an overly liberal bias, but arguably a majority of its judges are conservatives. While 17 judges have been appointed by Democratic presidents, 5 of those are solid conservatives. Thus only 12 of the Democrat_appointed judges are liberals or moderates, potentially leaving the remaining 15 as conservatives.


It is often called "the most overturned appeals court in the United States", but this is mostly a product of its high caseload. On a percentage basis, the circuit is not overturned much more than any other. (Indeed, in 2003 it had the least reversal rate of any appeals court with more than five cases reviewed.[1] (http://goldsteinhowe.com/blog/files/SemiFinalOT2003CircuitScorecard.pdf))


Because California lies within its territory, the court hears cases involving celebrities from time to time. In one well_known case involving Vanna White, Judge Alex Kozinski noted that "we are the Court of Appeals for the Hollywood Circuit."


In 2002, it made one of its most controversial decisions to date in the case of Newdow v. United States Congress. The court ruled that encouraging public school students to recite a pledge which includes the phrase "under God" (the Pledge of Allegiance) violated the First Amendment ban on establishment of religion. The decision was penned for the majority by Nixon appointee Alfred T. Goodwin, one of the senior status (semi-retired) judges on the court. The Supreme Court overturned this decision on June 14, 2004, because the plaintiff, Michael Newdow, lacked legal standing to bring suit. The Court did not address the constitutionality of the pledge.


The court is also on the leading edge of federalism, recently refusing to enforce federal laws against homemade pornography (US v. McCoy), homemade firearms (US v. Stewart), and homegrown marijuana (Raich v. Ashcroft). The court reasoned that application of such laws exceeded Congress's authority under the Commerce Clause, basing the decision on the Supreme Court case United States v. Lopez.


Judges

The judges on the court (as of December 8, 2004) are:

(Here circuit judges and senior circuit judges are listed in order of seniority.)


Three judgeships are vacant.


External links

  • United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/)
  • Recent opinions from FindLaw (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=9th&navby=year&year=recent)
  • Federal Judicial Center (http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/usca-09-frm?OpenFrameSet)



  Results from FactBites:
 
BBC NEWS | Technology | File-sharing systems in legal win (519 words)
Federal appeal court judges have ruled that the makers of peer-to-peer software are not responsible for what users do with their network.
It was made by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals and upheld a decision made in a lower court.
One factor that led the US court to rule in favour of Grokster and StreamCast was the lack of central servers that co-ordinate file-swapping activity.
Court rules against Napster and upholds injunction | OUT-LAW.COM (773 words)
Napster was started in 1999 by US teenager Shawn Fanning who wrote the software for the service that allows users to swap MP3 music files stored the hard drives of their computers.
It was this stay which the RIAA appealed to the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals.
The court agreed with US District Chief Judge Marilyn Hall Patel that Napster is likely to be found liable for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement and said that Napster has a responsibility to police its own system for infringement.
  More results at FactBites »


 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.