Occasionally, instead of saying that a property holds almost everywhere, one also says that the property holds for almost all elements, though the term almost all also has other meanings.
Here is a list of theorems that involve the term "almost everywhere":
If f : R->R is a Lebesgue integrable function and f(x) ≥ 0 almost everywhere, then
for every real numbers a < b, then there exists a null set E (depending on f) such that, if x is not in E, the Lebesgue mean
converges to f(x) as e decreases to zero. In other words, the Lebesgue mean of f converges to f almost everywhere. The set E is called the Lebesgue set of f.
If f(x,y) is Borel measurable on R2 then for almost every x, the function y→f(x,y) is Borel measurable.
The set of prime numbers is not almost N because there are infinitely many natural numbers that are not prime numbers.
This is conceptually similar to the almosteverywhere concept of measure theory, but is not the same.
So a real number in (0, 1) is a member of the complement of the Cantor set almosteverywhere, but it is not true that the complement of the Cantor set is almost the real numbers in (0, 1).
In measure theory (a branch of mathematical analysis), one says that a property holds almosteverywhere if the set of elements for which the property does not hold is a null set, i.e.
Occasionally, instead of saying that a property holds almosteverywhere, one also says that the property holds for almost all elements, though the term almost all also has other meanings.
In probability theory, the phrases become almost surely, almost certain or almost always, corresponding to a probability of 1.