FACTOID # 66: Australians have a huge 380,000 sq m of land per person - and yet 91% live in urban areas.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RELATED ARTICLES
People who viewed "Amiskwia" also viewed:
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Amiskwia

Amiskwia is a small, probably gelatinous animal of unknown affinity known from fossils of the Middle Cambrian Burgess shale formation in British Columbia.


The preservation of the five known specimens leaves much to be desired. Fossil size is up to 1 inch in length. The head contains two short tentacles, and the unsegmented trunk has two small, stubby side fins and a flattened tail. The gut runs straight from the head almost to the tail.


Amiskwia was originally categorized by Paleontologist Charles Walcott. Walcott thought he saw three buccal spines in the fossils, and therefore categorized Amiskwia as a chaetognath worm (arrow worm). However, since Amiskwia appears to lack the characteristic grasping spines and teeth of other Burgess fossil arrow worms, so later scientists suggested it was more likely a nemertean (ribbon worm). Conway Morris, who did a re-examination of the Burgess Shale fauna in the 1970s, described it as being the single known species in an otherwise unknown phylum.


Amiskwia is rare in the Burgess formation. This, along with the fins and tail, suggest it was a swimming animal that was inadvertently trapped in the turbid sediment flows that formed the Burgess deposits. Only one species, Amiskwia sagittiformis, has been described.


External link

  • http://www.nmnh.si.edu/paleo/shale/pamisk.htm



  Results from FactBites:
 
Amiskwia - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (221 words)
Amiskwia is a small, probably gelatinous animal of unknown affinity known from fossils of the Middle Cambrian Burgess shale formation in British Columbia.
Amiskwia was originally categorized by Paleontologist Charles Walcott.
This, along with the fins and tail, suggest it was a swimming animal that was inadvertently trapped in the turbid sediment flows that formed the Burgess deposits.
Amiskwia (141 words)
The preservation of the 5 known specimens leaves much to be desired.
Walcott[?] who thought he saw three buccal spines as a chaetognath worm.
Amiskwia is thought to have been a swimming animal trapped inadvertently in the turbid flows that formed the Burgess Shale deposits.
  More results at FactBites »


 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m