FACTOID # 115: The average person in the United Kingdom drinks as much tea as 23 Italians.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RELATED ARTICLES
People who viewed "Australopithecines" also viewed:
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS   

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Australopithecines

Australopithecines
Conservation status: Fossil

Austrolopithecus africanus
Hominid Reconstruction

Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Primates
Family: Hominidae
Genus: Australopithecus
Species

A. afarensis ("Lucy")
A. africanus
A. anamensis
A. garhi
Formerly Australopithecus,
now Paranthropus
P. aethiopicus
P. robustus
P. boisei

Australopithecines (genus Australopithecus) are a group of extinct Hominids that are closely related to humans. A. afarensis and A. africanus are among the most famous of the extinct hominids. A. africanus used to be regarded as ancestral to the genus Homo (in particular Homo erectus), but since then Hominid fossils have been found that are older than A. africanus, yet nevertheless seem to belong to the genus Homo. Thus, the genus Homo either split off from the genus Australopithecus at an earlier date (the latest common ancestor being A. afarensis or an even earlier form), or both developed from an as yet possibly unknown common ancestor independently. The Australopethicines first appeared roughly 3.9 million years ago. The brains of most species of Australopithecus were roughly 35 percent of the size of that of modern human brain. Most species of Australopithecus were diminutive and gracile, usually standing no more than 1.2 m tall.


The fossil record seems to indicate that Australopithecus is the common ancestor of the distinct group of hominids, now called Paranthropus, and the genus Homo, which includes modern humans. Both genera were more advanced in their behavior and habits than Australopithecus, which were little more than bipedal Chimpanzees. However, only representatives of Homo would develop language and learn to control fire.


Although opinions differ as to whether the species aethiopicus, boisei and robustus should be included within the genus Australopithecus, the current consenses in the scientific community is that they should be placed in a distinct genus, Paranthropus, which is believed to have developed from the ancestral Australopithecus line. Up until the last half decade the majority, however, included all the species shown at right in a single genus. Paranthropus, being more massive and robust, was also significantly morphologically distinct from Australopithecus, and its specialized physiology also implies that its behaviour was quite different from that of its ancestor.


The existence of Australopithecus seems to have put firmly to rest the theory that human-like intelligence evolved first and bipedalism followed. Australopithecus had a brain case not significantly larger than a modern chimpanzee. Yet Australopithecus was certainly bipedal, suggesting it was bipedalism which made human-like intelligence possible and not the other way around.


Most species of Australopithecus were not any more adept at tool use than modern primates. However, Australopithecus garhi does appear to have been the most advanced of the line. Its remains have been found with tools and butchered animal remains, suggesting the incipience of a very primitive tool industry. This leads many scientists to suspect that A. garhi is the ancestor of the Homo genus.


On 31 March 1994 the journal Nature reported the finding in Ethiopia of the first complete Australopithecus afarensis skull.


See also





  Results from FactBites:
 
Australopithecine (555 words)
What is not mentioned in [his] book about Lucy is the fact that [the] bottom portion [of the skeleton fossil] - the knee and the leg bone which is [what] defines her as the ancestor of humans was not found with the rest of the skeleton.
What is left out [of most of the Australopithecine material], especially regarding the Leakeys' effort, is [that] they don't think at all, and never did [think] that this led to man or has anything to do with man. Notice the point that is acknowledged by Lewin, the Editor of Research News in SCIENCE magazine.
The facultative bipedalism exhibited by the Australopithecine appears to be a primary evolutionary criteria for transitional status and...
Australopithecines (303 words)
Some believe that some of the australopithecine species are directly ancestral to humans, however others hold they are a "side-branch" of the line that led to humans, and not direct human ancestors.
Australopithecines stood about 1-1.5 m in height and had relatively small brains typically measuring between 370 and 515 cm3 (cc)--only slightly larger than the brain of a chimpanzee.
Early studies believed the australopithecine pelvis was a clear-cut precursor to Homo with human-like bipedality, while later studies of australopithecine locomotion found it to be different from modern apes, but also very different from humans--a distinct mode of locomotion.
  More results at FactBites »

 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your location
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.