We can use the axiom of extensionality to show that this set A is unique. We call the set A the empty set, and denote it {}. Thus the essence of the axiom is:
An empty set exists.
The axiom of empty set is generally considered uncontroversial, and it or an equivalent appears in just about any alternative axiomatisation of set theory.
The axiom of empty set may also be seen as a special case of a generalisation of the axiom of pairing.
In some formulations of ZF, the axiom of empty set is actually repeated in the axiom of infinity. On the other hand, there are other formulations of that axiom that don't presuppose the existence of an empty set. Also, the ZF axioms can also be written using a constant predicate representing the empty set; then the axiom of infinity uses this predicate without requiring it to be empty, while the axiom of empty set is needed to state that it is in fact empty. Furthermore, one sometimes considers set theories in which there are no infinite sets, and then the axiom of empty set will still be required. That said, any axiom that states the existence of any set will imply the axiom of empty set, using the axiom schema of separation.
In axiomatic set theory it is postulated to exist by the axiom of emptyset.
In the axiomatization of set theory known as Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory, the existence of the emptyset is assured by the axiom of emptyset.
The emptyset can be turned into a topological space in just one way (by defining the emptyset to be open); this empty topological space is the unique initial object in the category of topological spaces with continuous maps.