FACTOID # 97: Got a parking ticket in Finland? Better just pay up - it is the least corrupt nation in the world.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Belgian Supreme Court

The Court of Cassation (Dutch: Hof van Cassatie, French: Cour de cassation) is the main court of last resort in Belgium. It was originally modelled after the French Cour de cassation. Its jurisdiction and powers are similar to those of its French counterpart. The Court of Cassation (Cour de cassation in French) is the main court of last resort in France. ...



To maintain readability: Dutch will be abbreviated as D, French as F.

Contents

Organisation

The court comprises three chambers with 16 judges. Each chamber in turn has a Dutch and a French division. Each chamber has a chief judge, called the President, and two heads of division, one for each language group. The entire court is headed by a chief judge called the First President.


The parket generaal (D) or parquet général (F) is headed by the Chief Prosecutor (D: procureur-generaal, F: procureur-general). The Prosecutor is a magistrate, but does not actually try cases (his role is to give legal advice to the Court, in a similar manner to the Commissioner of the Government of Council of State (D: Raad van State, F:Conseil d'État ). He brings cases to the Court "in the name of the law." The Chief Prosecutor is aided by the First Prosecutor (first advocat-general) and about 12 Prosecutors (D: advocaten-generaal, F: advocat-generals). To meet Wikipedias quality standards, this article or section may require cleanup. ... Council of State (Dutch: Raad van State, French: Conseil dÉtat), in Belgium, is an organ of the Belgian government. ...


Bar

The lawyers, while not employees of the Court and not technically part of it, play an important role in the correct application of justice. English barrister A barrister is a lawyer found in many common law jurisdictions who employ a split profession (as opposed to a fused profession) in relation to legal representation. ...


With the exception of a few categories of litigation (namely in penal cases), it is compulsory to use an advocate when referring matters to the Court of Cassation. Lawyers admitted to pleading before this high court are known as advocaat bij het Hof van Cassatie (D) or avocat à la Cour de Cassation (F). Admission to this bar is particularly difficult, with special classes and a hard exam. The roles of these specialized lawyers includes advising litigants on whether their pleas are admissible, particularly that cassation cases only review points of law and not points of fact.


Jurisdiction

  • Appeal to the Court of Cassation is only possible against judgements against which no ordinary appeal is possible anymore. This will happen when all normal appeal procedures have been followed, usually before the Courts of Appeal. The Cour de cassation can only confirm these judgements, or annul them ("cassation", from the French "casser", to break). It can not examine the case and make a new judgement.
    The court can annul the entire judgement, or just part of it (D: gedeeltelijke cassatie, F: cassation partielle). If the court annuls a judgement, the case is taken back to a court at the same level as the one which judgement was overturned. The decision of the Court of Cassation is not (yet) binding, however. The new court may decide the case as it pleases (but the decision of the Court of Cassation has a persuasive value).
    The decision of the new court may again be appealed to the Court of Cassation. In this case, if the earlier decision of the Court of Cassation is confirmed, the case is brought before a third court at the same level as the one which judgement was overturned, but this time the decision of the Court of Cassation is binding on points of law.
  • In some cases, it is unclear whether a case should be heard before administrative courts or judiciary courts. In these conflicts of attribution, the Court of Cassation can be asked to decide who has jurisdiction.

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) is formally known as the Court of Justice of the European Communities, i. ... The Court of Arbitration of Belgium plays a central role within the federal Belgian state. ...

See also

In various countries, there exist courts of cassation: In Belgium, the Court of Cassation (Hof van Cassatie in Dutch, Cour de cassation in French) In France, the Cour de cassation In Italy, the Corte di Cassazione In Romania, the High Court of Cassation and Justice In Senegal, the Cour de... Council of State (Dutch: Raad van State, French: Conseil dÉtat), in Belgium, is an organ of the Belgian government. ... The Court of Arbitration of Belgium plays a central role within the federal Belgian state. ...

External links

  • Belgian Court of Cassation

  Results from FactBites:
 
Court Diary 18 - Human Rights Watch issues appeal to the Belgian government not to dismiss the Sabra & Shatila case ... (1186 words)
The Belgian Supreme Court, in a February decision on a complaint by victims of a 1982 massacre of civilians in the Palestinian refugee camps of Sabra and Shatilla, upheld the law against legal challenges, while ruling that top sitting state officials, such as Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, enjoyed immunity from Belgian courts.
A Belgian judge and police team visited Chad last year to investigate the charges against Habre who lives in exile in Senegal, where he was indicted three years ago on atrocity charges before the Senegalese courts ruled that he could not be tried there.
A 1993 law gives Belgian courts the authority to hear criminal complaints by victims accusing officials of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes abroad, regardless of where the crimes took place, whether the suspect or the victims are Belgian and whether the accused is in Belgium.
Court Diary 15 - The 12 February 2003 Decision of the Belgian Supreme Court Explained (1442 words)
On the contrary, it upheld the competence of the Court in accordance with Belgian law for serious violations of international humanitarian law, namely war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide, regardless of where the plaintiff is or any other condition not specified by the law.
The Belgian legislator considered itself a pioneer in the emerging field of universal jurisdiction and intended to create absolute universal jurisdiction for genocide, crimes against humanity, and war crimes in 1993, and certainly in 1999 when the present law was passed.
The Court observes, however, that defendant Ariel Sharon was Prime Minister of Israel at the time the complaint was lodged, and that still he remains the incumbent of that position today.
  More results at FactBites »


 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m