|
A contract is any legally-enforceable promise or set of promises made by one party to another and, as such, reflects the policies represented by freedom of contract. In the civil law, contracts are considered to be part of the general law of obligations. This article describes the law relating to contracts in common law jurisdictions. A promise is a transaction between two persons whereby the first person undertakes in the future to render some service or gift to the second person or devotes something valuable now and here to his use. ...
Freedom of contract is the key public policy that underpins the law of contract and justifies a legally enforceable system of bargaining as a benefit to society. ...
Civil law has at least three meanings. ...
The Law of Obligations is one of the component elements of the civil law system of law and encompasses contractual obligations, quasi-contractual obligations such as unjust enrichment and extra-contractual obligations. ...
This article concerns the common-law legal system, as contrasted with the civil law legal system; for other meanings of the term, within the field of law, see common law (disambiguation). ...
Distinguished from torts
Contract claims (where the parties have defined their own legal relationship) are usually distinguished from tort claims (where the relationship between the parties is defined by law or custom). As discussed more fully below, a contract may be express (either written or oral) or may be implied from circumstances. In certain cases (for example where there is a relevant "Statute of Frauds") a contract must either be written or at least evidenced in writing. Except in those special cases, there is no reason why a purely oral contract should not be valid. In the common law, a tort is a civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy. ...
The Statute of Frauds refers to a requirement in many common law jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically contractual obligations, be evidenced by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by their authorized agent. ...
Scope of common law contract law Basic common law contract law addresses four sets of issues: This article concerns the common-law legal system, as contrasted with the civil law legal system; for other meanings of the term, within the field of law, see common law (disambiguation). ...
- When and how is a contract formed?
- When may a party escape obligations of a contract (such as a contract formed under duress or because of a misrepresentation)?
- What is the meaning and effect to be given to the terms of a contract?
- What is the remedy to be given for breach of a contract?
Contract formation: Generally, formation of a contract requires a bargain in which there is a manifestation of mutual assent to the exchange and a consideration (see also consideration under English law). An obligation can be legal or moral. ...
Duress (coercion) (as a term of jurisprudence) is a possible defense, via excuse, by which a defendant may argue that they should not be held criminally liable for actions which broke the law. ...
(Note, Consideration under English law is dealt with separately) Consideration is a central concept in the common law of contracts. ...
Consideration under English law means a promise that has been made under contract. ...
Escape from contract: A party may in some cases escape obligations established by a contract for one of the following reasons:
-
- Mutual or unilateral mistake as to a basic assumption upon which the contract was made
- Misrepresentation of facts inducing one of the parties to enter the contract
- Duress inducing one of the parties to enter the contract
- Lack of capacity to contract (such as infancy, influence of drugs, alcohol or mental illness)
- Unconscionability
- Violation of a public policy
- Absence of a writing evidencing formation of the contract if the Statute of Frauds requires such a writing
- Performance of the contract becomes impossible or extremely difficult or costly by virtue of events occurring after the contract is formed
- The principal purpose of the contract is substantially frustrated by virtue of events occurring after the contract is formed
In some situations, a collateral contract may exist. Mistake of law and mistake of fact are two types of defense by excuse, via which a defendant may argue that they should not be held criminally liable for breaking the law or liable for damages under a civil law action. ...
Capacity is a legal term that refers to the ability of persons to make certain binding dispositions of their rights, such as entering into contracts, making gifts, or writing a valid will. ...
Unconscionability is a term used in contract law to describe a defense against the enforcement of a contract based on the presence of terms unfair to one party. ...
According to Thomas A. Birklands book An Introduction to the Policy Process, there is a lack of a consensus definition of public policy. ...
The Statute of Frauds refers to a requirement in many common law jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically contractual obligations, be evidenced by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by their authorized agent. ...
A collateral contract is a contract where the consideration is the entry into another contract, and co-exists side by side with the main contract. ...
Meaning and effect of contract terms: Many contract disputes involve a disagreement between the parties about what terms in the contract require each party to do or refrain from doing. Hence, many rules of contract law pertain to interpretation of terms of a contract that are vague or ambiguous. The parol evidence rule limits what things can be taken into account when trying to interpret a contract. The parol evidence rule enacts a principle of the law of contracts that presumes that a written contract emodies the complete agreement between the parties thereto. ...
Privity: In general, only parties to a contract may sue for the breach of a contract. The doctrine of Privity in English law provides that a contract cannot confer rights or impose obligations arising under it on any person or agent except the parties to it. ...
Validity of contracts For a contract to be valid, it must meet the following criteria: In psychology a conclusion is said to be valid, if and only if, it is based on true premises. ...
- Mutual agreement - (see main article offer and acceptance): There must be an express or implied agreement. The essential requirement is that there be evidence that the parties had each from an objective perspective engaged in conduct manifesting their assent, and a contract will be formed when the parties have met such a requirement. For a contract based on offer and acceptance to be enforced, the terms must be capable of determination in a way that it is clear that the parties assent was given to the same terms. The terms, like the manifestation of assent itself, are determined objectively.
- Consideration: There must be consideration (see also consideration under English law) given by all the parties, meaning that every party is conferring a benefit on the other party or himself sustaining a recognizable detriment, such as a reduction of the party's alternative courses of action where the party would otherwise be free to act with respect to the subject matter without any limitation.
- Competent, Adult (Sui Juris) Parties: Both parties must have the capacity to understand the terms of the contract they are entering into, and the consequences of the promises they make. For example, animals, minor children, and mentally disabled individuals do not have the capacity to form a contract, and any contracts with them will be considered void or voidable. Although corporations are technically legal fictions, they are considered persons under the law, and thus fit to engage in contracts.
- For adults, most jurisdictions have statutes declaring that the capacity of parties to a contract is presumed, so that one resisting enforcement of a contract on grounds that a party lacked the capacity to be bound bears the burden of persuasion on the issue of capacity.
- Proper Subject Matter: The contract must have a lawful purpose. A contract to commit murder in exchange for money will not be enforced by the courts. It is void ab initio, meaning "from the beginning."
- Mutual Right to Remedy: Both parties must have an equal right to remedy upon breach of the terms by the other party
- Mutual Obligation to Perform: Both Parties must have some obligation to fulfill to the other. This can be distinct from consideration, which may be an initial inducement into the contract.
Offer and acceptance analysis is a tool in contract law used to determine whether a contract exists between two parties. ...
(Note, Consideration under English law is dealt with separately) Consideration is a central concept in the common law of contracts. ...
Consideration under English law means a promise that has been made under contract. ...
Capacity is a legal term that refers to the ability of persons to make certain binding dispositions of their rights, such as entering into contracts, making gifts, or writing a valid will. ...
A corporation is a legal entity (distinct from a natural person) that often has similar rights in law to those of a Civil law systems may refer to corporations as moral persons; they may also go by the name AS (anonymous society) or something similar, depending on language (see below). ...
In the common law, legal fictions, are suppositions of fact taken to be true by the courts of law, but which are not necessarily true. ...
In colloquial English, person is often synonymous with human. ...
The Latin term ab initio means from the beginning and is used in several contexts: when describing literature: told from the beginning as opposed to in medias res (meaning starting in the middle of the story). ...
Written contracts Contrary to common wisdom, an informal exchange of promises can still be binding and legally as valid as a written contract. A spoken contract is often called an "oral contract", not a "verbal contract." A verbal contract is simply a contract that uses words. All oral contracts and written contracts are verbal contracts. Contracts that are created without the use of words are called "non-verbal, non-oral contracts" or "a contract implied by the acts of the parties." An oral contract is a contract that exists only in verbal communication, having not been written down or only partially written; in the latter case, the partially written contract lacks a memorandum. ...
Courts in the United States have generally ruled that if the parties have a meeting of the minds, and act as though there was a formal, written and signed contract, then a contract exists. However, most jurisdictions require a signed writing for certain kinds of contracts (like real estate transactions). This article is about courts of law. ...
In the United States, a law setting out such requirements is typically called the Statute of Frauds; the name originates from an English statute that was for "the prevention of frauds." The point of the Statute of Frauds is to prevent false allegations of the existence of contracts that were never made, by requiring formal (i.e. written) evidence of the contract. Contracts that do not meet the requirements of Statute of Frauds legislation are unenforceable, but not void. However, a party unjustly enriched by an unenforceable contract may be subject to restitution for unjust enrichment. The Statute of Frauds refers to a requirement in many common law jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically contractual obligations, be evidenced by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by their authorized agent. ...
Restitution is the process by which land and other property that was forcibly removed from its owners is restored or compensation of equivalent value provided. ...
In civil law, unjust enrichment means one party has conferred a benefit upon another party with the expectation he would be compensated for doing so, but has not received compensation equal to the value of the benefit conferred. ...
In Australia, for contracts subject to legislation equivalent to the Statute of Frauds, there is no requirement for the entire contract to be in writing, although there must be a note or memorandum evidencing the contract, which may come into existence after the contract has been formed. The note or memorandum must be signed in some way, and a series of documents may be used in place of a single note or memorandum. It must contain all material terms of the contract, the subject matter and the parties to the contract.
In England and Wales, the Statute of Frauds is still in force, but only for guarantees, which must be evidenced in writing, although the agreement may be made orally. Certain other kinds of contract (such as for the sale of land) must be in writing or they are void. The Statute of Frauds refers to a requirement in many common law jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically contractual obligations, be evidenced by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by their authorized agent. ...
Guarantee (sometimes spelt guarantie or guaranty; an O. Fr. ...
Furthermore, the existence of a written contract does not necessarily ensure its enforceability or validity. A contract can be deemed unenforceable if it requires a party to undertake an illegal act, if it was signed under duress or while intoxicated, if the disparity in knowledge between the parties is extreme and the weaker party was given onerous terms, etc. Duress (coercion) (as a term of jurisprudence) is a possible defense, via excuse, by which a defendant may argue that they should not be held criminally liable for actions which broke the law. ...
If the terms of a contract subject to Statute of Frauds legislation are to be varied, the variations must be noted in writing as well. However, the contract may be discharged orally.
If a contract is in a written form, then generally, you are bound by its terms regardless of whether you have read it or not (L'Estrange v. F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394). However, this is tempered by the exception that if the terms of the contract are misrepresented, then the plaintiff is unable to rely on the terms of the contract; in addition, the document must be contractual in nature (Curtis v. Chemical Cleaning and Dyeing Co [1951] 1 KB 805).
Furthermore, if a party wishes to use a document as the basis of a contract, reasonable notice of its terms must be given to the other party prior to their entry into the contract (see Balmain New Ferry Company Ltd v. Robertson (1906) 4 CLR 379). This includes such things as tickets issued at parking stations. In contract law, ticket cases are a series of cases that stand for the proposition that if you are handed a ticket or another document with terms, and you retain the ticket or document, then you are bound by those terms. ...
Void, voidable and unenforceable contracts In general, there are three classifications of contracts that are not binding: - Void: If a contract is held to be void, the contract has never come into existence. For example, a contract is void if it is based on an illegal purpose or contrary to public policy; the classic example is a contract with a hit man. Such a contract will not be recognized by a court, and cannot be enforced by either party.
- Voidable: A contract is voidable if one of the parties has the option to terminate the contract. Contracts with minors are examples of voidable contracts.
- Unenforceable: If a contract is unenforceable, neither party may enforce the other's obligations. For example, in the United States, a contract is unenforceable if it violates the Statute of frauds. An example of the above is an oral contract for the sale of a motorcycle for US$5,000 (because in the USA any contract for the sale of goods over US$500 must be in writing to be enforceable).
According to Thomas A. Birklands book An Introduction to the Policy Process, there is a lack of a consensus definition of public policy. ...
A hitman (alternately, hit man) is a hired assassin, often by organized crime. ...
The Statute of Frauds refers to a requirement in many common law jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically contractual obligations, be evidenced by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by their authorized agent. ...
The United States dollar is the official currency of the United States. ...
Uncertainty and incompleteness If the terms of the contract are uncertain or incomplete, the parties cannot have reached an agreement in the eyes of the law. An agreement to agree does not constitute a contract, and an inability to agree on key issues, which may include such things as price, may cause the entire contract to fail.
However, a court will attempt to give effect to commercial contracts where possible, by construing a reasonable construction of the contract (see Hillas v. Arcos Ltd (1932) 147 LT 503). Hillas v. ...
Courts may also look to external standards, which are either mentioned explicitly in the contract (Whitlock v. Brew (1968) 118 CLR 445) or implied by common practice in a certain field (Three Rivers Trading Co., Ltd. v. Gwinear & District Farmers, Ltd. (1967), 111 Sol. J. 831). In addition, the court may also imply a term; if price is excluded, the court may imply a reasonable price, with the exception of land, and second-hand goods, which are unique.
Severence of unenforceable clauses If there are uncertain or incomplete clauses in the contract, and all options in resolving its true meaning have failed, it may be possible to sever and void just those affected clauses. The test of whether a clause is severable is an objective test - whether a reasonable person would see the contract standing even without the clauses.
Spy contracts In the U.S., one unusual type of unenforceable contract is a personal employment contract to work as a spy or secret agent. This is because the very secrecy of the contract is a condition of the contract (in order to maintain plausible deniability). If the spy subsequently sues the government on the contract over issues like salary or benefits, then the spy has breached the contract by revealing its existence. It is thus unenforceable on that ground, as well as the public policy of maintaining national security (since a disgruntled agent might try to reveal all the government's secrets during his lawsuit). Employment is a contract between two parties, one being the employer and the other being the employee. ...
Spy and secret agent redirect here; for alternate use, see Spy (disambiguation) and Secret agent (disambiguation). ...
Spy and secret agent redirect here; for alternate use, see Spy (disambiguation) and Secret agent (disambiguation). ...
Plausible deniability is a political doctrine originally developed in the United States in the 1950s and applied to operations by the then newly-formed Central Intelligence Agency. ...
Security measures outside the Houses of Parliament, London, England. ...
Bilateral v. unilateral contracts Contracts may be bilateral or unilateral. The more common of the two, a bilateral contract, is an agreement in which each of the parties to the contract makes a promise or promises to the other party. For example, in a contract for the sale of a home, the buyer promises to pay the seller £200,000 in exchange for the seller's promise to deliver title to the property.
In a unilateral contract, only one party to the contract makes a promise. A typical example is the reward contract: A promises to pay a reward to B if B finds A's dog. B is not obliged to find A's dog, but A is obliged to pay the reward to B if B finds the dog. In this example, the finding of the dog is a condition precedent to A's obligation to pay. An event of state of affairs that is required before something else will occur. ...
An offer of a unilateral contract may often be made to many people (or 'to the world') by means of an advertisement. In that situation, acceptance will only occur on satisfaction of the condition (such as the finding of the offeror's dog). If the condition is something that only one party can perform, both the offeror and offeree are protected — the offeror is protected because he will only ever be contractually obliged to one of the many offerees; and the offeree is protected, because if she does perform the condition, the offeror will be contractually obliged to pay her.
In unilateral contracts, the requirement that acceptance be communicated to the offeror is waived. The offeree accepts by performing the condition, and the offeree's performance is also treated as the price, or consideration, for the offeror's promise. (Note, Consideration under English law is dealt with separately) Consideration is a central concept in the common law of contracts. ...
The most common type of unilateral contract is the insurance contract. The insurance company promises to pay the insured a stated amount of money on the happening of an event if the insured pays premiums; note that the insured does not make any promise to pay the premiums.
Courts generally favor bilateral contracts. The general rule in the United States is: "In case of doubt, an offer is interpreted as inviting the offeree to accept either by promising to perform what the offer requests or by rendering the performance, as the offeree chooses." Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 32 (1981) (emphasis added). Here the law attempts to provide some protection from the risk of revocation in a unilateral contract to the offeree. Note that if the offer specifically requests performance rather than a promise, a unilateral contract will exist. See option contracts for more information on protection given to the offeree in a unilateral contract. An option contract is defined as a promise which meets the requirements for the formation of a contract and limits the promisors power to revoke an offer. ...
Express and implied contracts A contract can be either an express contract or an implied contract. An express contract is one in which the terms are expressed verbally, either orally or in writing. An implied contract is one in which some of the terms are not expressed in words.
Implied in fact or implied in law An implied contract can either be implied in fact or implied in law. A contract which is implied in fact is one in which the circumstances imply that parties have reached an agreement even though they have not done so expressly. For example, by going to a doctor for a physical, a patient agrees that he will pay a fair price for the service. If he refuses to pay after being examined, he has breached a contract implied in fact. A quasi-contract, also an implied-in-law contract, is a legal substitute for a contract. ...
Quasi-contract A contract which is implied in law is also called a quasi-contract, because it is not in fact a contract; rather, it is a means for the courts to remedy situations in which one party would be unjustly enriched were he or she not required to compensate the other. For example, an unconscious patient treated by a doctor at the scene of an accident has not agreed (either expressly or by implication) to pay the doctor for emergency services, but the patient would be unjustly enriched by the doctor's services were the patient not required to compensate the doctor. A quasi-contract, also an implied-in-law contract, is a legal substitute for a contract. ...
Incorporation of terms
Course of dealing If two parties have regularly conduct business on certain terms, it may be reasonable to presume that in future dealings where there is no contract, the parties wish to incorporate the terms of the previous contracts. However, if a party wishes to incorporate terms by course of dealing, the original document must have been contractual in nature, and delivery receipts may not fit this description. In Australia, there is a further requirement that the document was procured after formation.
Express and implied terms
Different types of statements Whether a statement is a term of a contract is important because only if a promise is a term of the contract can a party sue for the breach of the contract. Statements can be split into the following types: - Puff (sales talk): If no reasonable person hearing this statement would take it seriously, it is a puff, and no action in contract is available if the statement proves to be wrong.
- Representation: A representation is a statement of fact made to induce another person to enter into a contract and which does induce them to enter into a contract, but it is one that the maker of the statement does not guarantee its truth. If the statement proves to be incorrect, it cannot be enforced, as it is not a term of the contract, but it may prove to be a misrepresentation, whereupon other remedies are available.
- Term: A term is similar to a representation, but the truth of the statement is guaranteed by the person who made the statement. The test is an objective test.
Factors that a court may take into account in determining the nature of a statement include: - Timing: If the contract was concluded soon after the statement was made, this is a strong indication that the statement induced the person to enter into the contract.
- Content of statement: It is necessary to consider what was said in the given context, which has nothing to do with the importance of a statement.
- Knowledge and expertise: In Oscar Chess Ltd v. Williams [1957] 1 WLR 370, a person selling a car to a second-hand car dealer stated that it was a 1948 Morris, when in fact it was a 1939 model car. It was held that the statement did not become a term because a reasonable person in the position of the car dealer would not have thought that an inexperienced person would have guaranteed the truth of the statement.
Terms implied in fact The Privy Council proposed a five stage test in BP Refinery Western Port v. Shire of Hastings: - Reasonableness and equitableness: The implied term must be reasonable and equitable.
- Business efficacy: The implied term must be necessary for the business efficacy of the contract. For instance, if the term simply causes the contract to operate better, that does not fit this criterion.
- Obviousness: The term is so obvious that it goes without saying. Furthermore, there must be one and only one thing that would be implied by the parties. For example, in Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v. State Rail Authority of New South Wales (1982) 149 CLR 337, a term regarding the inability of construction company to work three shifts a day could not be implied because it was unclear what form it would have taken.
- Clear expression: The term must be capable of clear expression. No specific technical knowledge should be required.
- Consistency: The implied term may not contradict an express term.
In Australia, the High Court has ruled that the test in BP Refinery applies only to formal contracts, while the test in Byrne and Frew v. Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410 shall apply to informal contracts: A formal contract is a contract where the parties have attempted to spell out all the terms, while an informal contract is one where the parties have not attempted to spell out all the terms. ...
A formal contract is a contract where the parties have attempted to spell out all the terms, while an informal contract is one where the parties have not attempted to spell out all the terms. ...
- Necessity: The term must be necessary to ensure reasonable or effective operation of a contract of the nature before the court.
- Consistency: The implied term may not contradict an express term (same as for formal contracts).
- Clear expression: The term must be capable of clear expression (same as for formal contracts).
- Obvious: McHugh and Gummow JJ have stated that it must also be obvious.
Terms implied in law These are terms that have been implied into standardised relationships. The other difference between this and terms implied in fact is that the test is one of necessity (Liverpool City Council v. Irwin [1976] 2 WLR 562); a necessary term is one where the contract is rendered worthless or nugatory if it is without it.
Terms implied by custom or trade You are generally bound by the custom of the industry that you are in. To imply a term due to custom or trade, you must prove the existence of the custom, which must be notorious, certain, legal and reasonable (Con-stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v. Norwich Winterthur Insurance (Australia) Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 226). See also Frigaliment Importing Co., Ltd., v. B.N.S. International Sales Corp., 190 F. Supp. 116 (S.D.N.Y. 1960) (plaintiff failed to prove what he meant by "chicken") and U.C.C. § 1-205.
Agreements to negotiate It is common for lengthy negotiations to be written into a heads of agreement document that includes a clause to the effect that the rest of the agreement is to be negotiated. Although these cases may appear to fall into the category of agreement to agree, courts nowadays (at least in Australia) will imply an obligation to negotiate in good faith provided that certain conditions are satisfied (Coal Cliff Collieries Pty Ltd v. Sijehama Pty Ltd (1991) 24 NSWLR 1): In law, good faith (in Latin, bona fides) is the mental and moral state of honest, even if objectively unfounded, conviction as to the truth or falsehood of a proposition or body of opinion, or as to the rectitude or depravity of a line of conduct. ...
- Negotiations were well-advanced and the large proportion of terms have been worked out; and
- There exists some mechanism to resolve disputes if the negotiations broke down.
The test of whether one has acted in good faith is a subjective one; the cases suggest honesty, and possibly also reasonably.
"Subject to" contracts If a contract specifies "subject to contract", it may fall into one of three categories (Masters v. Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353): - The parties are immediately bound to the bargain, but they intend to restate the deal in a formalised contract that will not have a different effect; or
- The parties have completely agreed to the terms, but have made the execution of some terms in the contract conditional on the creation of a formalised contract; or
- It is merely an agreement to agree, and the deal will not be concluded until the formalised contract has been drawn up.
If a contract specifies "subject to finance", it imposes obligations on the purchaser (Meehan v. Jones (1982) 149 CLR 571): - The purchaser must seek finance; and
- When offers of finance arrive, the purchaser must make a decision as to whether the offers of finance are suitable.
Once again, there is an element of good faith involved.
Statutory law applicable to contracts The rules by which many contracts are governed are provided in specialized statutes that deal with particular subjects. Most countries, for example, have statutes which deal directly with sale of goods, lease transactions and trade practices. For example, most American states have adopted Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which regulates contracts for the sale of goods. A contract of sale is a legal act that involves an exchange of goods, services or property to be exchanged from seller (or vendor) to buyer (or purchaser) for an agreed upon value in money (or money equivalent) paid or the promise to pay same. ...
This article or section should include material from Tenancy agreement A lease is a contract conveying from one person (the lessor) to another person (the lessee) the right to use and control some article of property for a specified period of time (the term), without conveying ownership, in exchange for...
The Uniform Commercial Code is one of the Uniform Acts that attempts to harmonise the law of the fifty U.S. states in the United States of America. ...
There are also many acts around the world which deal with specific types of transactions and businesses. For example, the states of California and New York in the U.S. have statutes that govern the provision of services to customers by health studios, and the UK has the Sale of Goods Act 1979 which governs the contracts between sellers and buyers. State nickname: The Golden State Other U.S. States Capital Sacramento Largest city Los Angeles Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger Official languages English Area 410,000 km² (3rd) - Land 404,298 km² - Water 20,047 km² (4. ...
State nickname: Empire State Other U.S. States Capital Albany Largest city New York Governor George Pataki Official languages None Area 141,205 km² (27th) - Land 122,409 km² - Water 18,795 km² (13. ...
Wikiquote has a collection of quotations by or about: United States Wikinews has news related to this article: United States United States government Official website of the United States government - Gateway to governmental sites White House - Official site of the US President Senate. ...
Remedies
Damages Typically, the remedy for breach of contract is an award of money damages. Courts usually adopt one of three ways of calculating the value of damages. Breach of contract is a legal concept in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other partys performance. ...
Damages, in law has two different meanings. ...
The most common is to assess the sum which would restore the injured party to the economic position that he or she expected from performance of the promise or promises (known as an "expectation measure" or "benefit-of-the-bargain" measure of damages).
When it is either not possible or desirable to award damages measured in that way, a court may award money damages designed to restore the injured party to the economic position that he or she had occupied at the time the contract was entered (known as the "reliance measure"), or designed to prevent the breaching party from being unjustly enriched ("restitution"). Restitution is the process by which land and other property that was forcibly removed from its owners is restored or compensation of equivalent value provided. ...
Specific Perfomance There may be circumstances in which it would be unjust to permit the defaulting party simply to buy out the injured party with damages. For example where an art collector purchases a rare painting and the vendor refuses to deliver, the collector's damages would be equal to the sum paid.
The court may make an order of what is called "specific performance", requiring that the contract be performed.In some circumstances a court will order a party to perform his or her promise (an order of "specific performance") or issue an order, known as an "injunction," that a party refrain from doing something that would breach the contract. In the law of remedies, a specific performance is a demand of a party to perform a specific act. ...
In the law of remedies, a specific performance is a demand of a party to perform a specific act. ...
Both an order for specific performance or an injunction are discretionary remedies, originating for the most part in equity. Neither is available as of right and in most jurisdictions and most circumstances a court will not normally order specific performance. For other uses, see Equity (disambiguation). ...
Procedure In the United States, in order to obtain damages for breach of contract or to obtain specific performance, the injured party may file a civil (non-criminal) lawsuit, usually in a state court, or petition a private arbitrator to decide the contract issues presented.
Many contracts provide that all contract disputes must be arbitrated by the parties to the contract, rather than litigated in courts. By law, some contracts, including most securities brokerage contracts, must be arbitrated; other contracts are referred by courts as a matter of local law or policy. Arbitrated judgements are generally enforced and appealed in the same manner as ordinary court judgements; a majority of states have adopted the Uniform Arbitration Act to facilitate the enforcement of arbitrated judgements.
In England and Wales, a contract may be enforced by use of a claim, or in urgent cases by applying for an interim injunction to prevent a breach. For the direction right, see left and right or starboard. ...
Theoretical considerations Contract theory is the body of legal theory that addresses normative and conceptual questions in contract law. One of the most important questions asked in contract theory is why contracts are enforced. One prominent answer to this question focuses on the economic benefits of enforcing bargains. Another approach, associated with Charles Fried, maintains that the purpose of contract law is to enforce promises. This theory is developed in Fried's book, Contract as Promise. Other approaches to contract theory are found in the writings of legal realists and critical legal studies theorists. Contract theory is the body of legal thought that investigates normative and conceptual problems in contract law. ...
Legal realism is a family of theories about the nature of law, usually associated with the United States (American Legal Realism) and Scandinavia (The Scandinavian Realists). ...
Critical legal studies refers to a movement in legal thought that applied methods similar to those critical theory (the Frankfurt School) to law. ...
See also Contract theory is the body of legal thought that investigates normative and conceptual problems in contract law. ...
Force majeure is a common clause in contracts which essentially frees one or both parties from liabilities when an extraordinary event beyond the control of the parties, such as flood, war, riots, acts of God, et cetera prevents one or both parties from fulfilling their obligations under the contract. ...
A Gentlemens agreement is an informal agreement between two parties. ...
In law, good faith (in Latin, bona fides) is the mental and moral state of honest, even if objectively unfounded, conviction as to the truth or falsehood of a proposition or body of opinion, or as to the rectitude or depravity of a line of conduct. ...
An implicit contract refers to a transaction or relationship that is conducted without formal contract. ...
In contract law, an invitation to treat is an action by one party which may appear to be a contractual offer but which is actually inviting others to make an offer of their own. ...
A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is a legal document describing an agreement between parties. ...
Negotiation is the process whereby interested parties resolve disputes, agree upon courses of action, bargain for individual or collective advantage, and/or attempt to craft outcomes which serve their mutual interests. ...
An option contract is defined as a promise which meets the requirements for the formation of a contract and limits the promisors power to revoke an offer. ...
Estoppel is a concept that prevents a party from acting in a certain way because it is not equitable to do so. ...
A quasi-contract, also an implied-in-law contract, is a legal substitute for a contract. ...
A remedy is the solution or amelioration of a problem or difficulty. ...
A standard form contract (sometimes referred to as a contract of adhesion or boilerplate contract) is a contract between two parties that does not allow for negotiation, i. ...
External links - Cornell Law School contracts: an overview
- Principles of European Contract Law
- Behavioral Contracting in the Classroom
|
Feeds |
Contact