The Anti-Saloon League launched the Board of Temperance Strategy to coordinate resistance to the growing public demand for the repeal of prohibition (1920-1933) that was occuring in the U.S. in the early 1930s. The Anti-Saloon League was the leading organization lobbying for [[prohibition]] in the United States in the early 20th century. ... A repeal is the removal or reversal of a law. ... Prohibition agents destroying barrels of alcohol. ...
The Board of Temperance Strategy consisted of representatives from 33 major anti-alcohol or temperance organizations. The effort failed and the national prohibition of alcohol was repealed in December of 1933. Temperance organizations (that is, organizations in the temperance movement) of the United States played an essential role in bringing about ratification of the Eighteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution establishing national prohibition of alcohol. ...
See also
History of Anti-Alcohol Movements in the U.S.
The Ku Klux Klan (KKK), Alcohol and Prohibition
Reference
Roizen, Ron. The American Discovery of Alcoholism. Berkeley, CA: University of California at Berkeley, Ph.D. dissertation, 1991.
Part of the early strategy for dollars from the Commonwealth should involve Lincoln moving independently from the other state-relateds with a marketing package that really speaks to the kinds of things which were raised and to the contribution that Lincoln is making to the Commonwealth.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees hereby determines that the Board decision to treat 7% of the value of the Endowment Funds Assets held by the University as income is consistent with the long-term preservation of real value of the assets.
The Board formally decided some years ago not to have reports come to the Board from the Barnes and asked that this be revisited at some point to say the Board should not be so disconnected just in terms of information.
Boards appoint a chief executive officer (CEO) to coordinate and oversee these management efforts, and the CEO, in turn, is empowered to hire the top managers.
Moreover, corporate boards are increasingly aware of the need to treat nonshareholder constituents fairly and have regard for their interests so that the corporation can succeed financially, as well as live up to the demands for social responsibility placed on it by those stakeholders and others.
To illustrate, consider this scenario: The board of a gold mining company is deciding whether to purchase an expensive license to prospect in an area that has a 20 percent chance of yielding valuable gold deposits.
Feeds |
Contact