FACTOID # 45: American adults have spent more time than anyone in education .
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Britain J. Williams

Britain J. Williams is a Professor Emeritus at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, and is director of the school's Center For Election Systems. He is a figure in the controversy over Diebold and electronic voting systems.


He was a consultant to the FEC during the development of the FEC Voting System Standards in 1990 and again in 2002. He is currently a member of the NASED Voting Systems Board and Chair of the NASED Voting Systems Board Technical Committee. He serves as a consultant to the states of Georgia, Maryland, Pennsylvania and Virginia, where he has certified electronic voting systems. In 2003, he wrote a defense of the Georgia electronic voting system in response to criticism of Diebold systems levied by Bev Harris, author of Black Box Voting. The Williams defense of Georgia procedures provides the only biographical information about him available on the Net. [1] (http://www.votescount.com/georgia.pdf)


Williams appeared at a United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Public Hearing on the Use, Security and Reliability of Electronic Voting Systems in Washington, DC on 5 May 2004. Other technology panelists included Dr. Avi Rubin, Johns Hopkins University, Information Security Institute; Stephen Berger, IEEE; and Dr. Ted Selker, MIT. The EAC is providing $2.3 billion dollars in grants to States for upgrading election equipment.


Controversy

Williams is positioned as a recognized expert on electronic voting systems; he is a consulant to Diebold, the FEC, and four states. However, there is no publicly available information about his education/degrees, courses taught at Kennesaw or positions held. Williams reportedly has held a key position at the IEEE. [2] (http://www.americanfreepress.net/08_25_03/Concerns_Over/concerns_over.html)


NASED is the National Association of Election Directors; these are high level government employees. NASED is not an association of computing professionals. Kennesaw State University began life as a junior (community) college in 1963; it became a university in 1996. It is not an established research institution in computer security.


Williams does not appear as an author of any paper - technical or otherwise - in a search of ACM, the first society in computing, nor has he ever participated in the 23-year old ACM public forum on "Risks to the Public in Computers and Related Systems" (RISKS-L). [3] (http://catless.ncl.ac.uk/Risks/) In contrast, Peter G. Neumann, moderator of that forum, published "Security Criteria for Electronic Voting" in 1993 at the 16th National Computer Security Conference. [4] (http://www.csl.sri.com/users/neumann/ncs93.html)


External links


  Results from FactBites:
 
Britain J. Williams - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (415 words)
Britain J. Williams is a Professor Emeritus at Kennesaw State University in Georgia, and is director of the school's Center For Election Systems.
Williams appeared at a United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Public Hearing on the Use, Security and Reliability of Electronic Voting Systems in Washington, DC on 5 May 2004.
Williams does not appear as an author of any paper - technical or otherwise - in a search of ACM, the first society in computing, nor has he ever participated in the 23-year old ACM public forum on "Risks to the Public in Computers and Related Systems" (RISKS-L).
SEP: Bernard Williams (9878 words)
Williams has a different answer to the puzzle why we blame people more when they are successful murderers, or not only reckless but lethal motorists, despite the fact that they have no voluntary control over their success as murderers or their lethality as motorists.
Williams' point is rather that the whole business of compiling balance-sheets of the utilitarian sort is incompatible with the phenomenon of agency as we know it: “the reason why utilitarianism cannot understand integrity is that it cannot coherently describe the relations between a man's projects and his actions” (UFA: 100).
Williams sees an incoherence at the very heart of the project of indirect utilitarianism, because he does not believe that the ambition to justify one's life “from the outside” in the utilitarian fashion can be coherently combined with the ambition to live that life “from the inside”.
  More results at FactBites »


 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m