FACTOID # 166: Most households in Europe and North America contain fewer than three people.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Broken plurals

In the field of linguistics, broken plurals is a grammatical phenomenon typical in many Semitic languages of the Middle East and Ethiopia in which a singular noun is "broken" to form a plural rather than by merely adding a prefix or suffix to the original singular noun, as in English. (Example: cat -> cats) Broadly conceived, linguistics is the scientific study of human language, and a linguist is someone who engages in this study. ... Semitic is an adjective referring to the peoples who have traditionally spoken Semitic languages or to things pertaining to them. ... A map showing countries commonly considered to be part of the Middle East The Middle East is a region comprising the lands around the southern and eastern parts of the Mediterranean Sea, a territory that extends from the eastern Mediterranean Sea to the Persian Gulf. ... Prefix has meanings in linguistics, mathematics and computer science, and telecommunications. ... Suffix has meanings in linguistics and nomenclature. ...


As Semitic languages typically form word roots from 2, 3, or 4 consonants minus any vowels - e.g. K-T-B "to write" - vowels may be removed or inserted without affecting the basic root. Using the root K-T-B for illustration, here are some sample broken plurals in Arabic: Arabic (العربية) is a Semitic language, closely related to Hebrew and Aramaic. ...

  • KiTaaB "book" → KuTuB "books"
  • KaaTiB "writer" → KuTTaaB "writers"
  • maKTaB "office" → maKaaTiB "offices" (place of writing)
  • maKTuuB "letter" → maKaaTiiB "letters" (object that is written)

  Results from FactBites:
 
Collective Intentionality [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] (10298 words)
Bratman avoids positing a plural agent by trying to explain collective intentions in terms of individual attitudes with common contents that are distinctively social in the sense that solitary individuals could not have them.
Plural subjects are formed when each of a set of individual agents expresses willingness to constitute, with the others, the plural subject of a goal, belief, principle of action, or other such thing, in conditions of common knowledge.
So her analysis of plural subjecthood does not contain the technical notion of a plural subject and her analysis is not circular.
  More results at FactBites »


 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m