 The Child Support Agency (or CSA) is a UK Government Executive Agency, part of the Department for Work and Pensions, launched on April 5, 1993. The CSA is responsible for implementing the 1991 Child Support Act and subsequent legislation.[1] Image File history File links CSAlogo. ...
An Executive Agency is a British public institution that carries out some part of the executive functions of the United Kingdom government, Scottish Executive, Welsh Assembly and Northern Ireland Executive. ...
The Department for Work and Pensions is a department of the Government of the United Kingdom, created on June 8, 2001 from the merger of the Employment part of the Department for Education and Employment and the Department of Social Security. ...
April 5 is the 95th day of the year in the Gregorian calendar (96th in leap years). ...
1993 (MCMXCIII) was a common year starting on Friday of the Gregorian calendar and marked the Beginning of the International Decade to Combat Racism and Racial Discrimination (1993-2003). ...
Overview
Child Support, or Child Maintenance, is the contribution from a non-resident parent towards the financial cost of raising their child, paid to the person with whom the child lives, (usually the other parent), referred to as "person/parent with care". The level and conditions of payment can either be mutually agreed between the two parties, or, in case of disagreement, decided by legal means. In many countries, child support or child maintenance is the ongoing obligation for a periodic payment made by a non-custodial parent to a custodial parent, caregiver or guardian, for the care and support of children of a relationship or marriage that has been terminated. ...
Prior to the launch of the CSA, child support disputes were handled by a court based system. This system did not have the power to trace absent parents, and was criticised as "arbitrary and unfair".[2] The CSA was given the task of assessing payments to ensure consistency, with the powers to collect and distribute the maintenance payments itself.
Functions and involvement The CSA's function is two-fold, encompassing calculation of how much child maintenance is due (based on current legislation and rules) and collection and transferral of the payment from the non-resident parent to the person with care. Legislation (or statutory law) is law which has been promulgated (or enacted) by a legislature or other governing body. ...
A payment is the act of transfering wealth into another person or company. ...
For the CSA to become involved on a case, their services must be requested by one of the parents or the child, except cases in which the person with care is on benefits, whereby the CSA become automatically involved. (In July 2006, plans were outlined which would remove this automatic involvement.[3]) The CSA cannot get involved, even upon request, if the non-resident parent lives abroad, if a written agreement made prior to April 5, 1993, is in place, or if a court order regarding maintenance was made (except in cases where the parent with care claims Income Support or Jobseekers Allowance).[4] Look up Agreement in Wiktionary, the free dictionary An agreement may be an agreement in beliefs, rules, practices (policies), or conduct. ...
A court order is an official proclamation by a judge (or panel of judges) that defines the legal relationships between the parties before the court and requires or authorizes the carrying out of certain steps by one or more parties to a case. ...
Calculation and systems A new method of child maintenance calculation came into effect on March 3, 2003. The previous method used a "complex formula of up to 108 pieces of information"[5], by first calculating the total child maintenance required based on the children's ages, then calculating the non-resident parents income after various allowances were subtracted, and finally working out what portion of the calculated maintenance was to be paid by the non-resident parent, based on their income.[6] March 3 is the 62nd day of the year in the Gregorian Calendar (63rd in leap years). ...
2003 (MMIII) was a common year starting on Wednesday of the Gregorian calendar. ...
In many countries, child support or child maintenance is the ongoing obligation for a periodic payment made by a non-custodial parent to a custodial parent, caregiver or guardian, for the care and support of children of a relationship or marriage that has been terminated. ...
The examples and perspective in this article or section may not represent a worldwide view. ...
Under the new method the basis for calculating maintenance has been simplified, with a fixed percentage of the non-resident parents net income being taken, from 15% for one child, 20% for two, and 25% for three or more. The maintenance was also reduced if the non-resident parent had children in their current family, reducing the payment by 15% if they had one, 20% if they had two, and 25% for three or more.[7] Cases assessed using the previous method will remain that way until the new arrangements have been proven viable[8]. Some special cases may be transferred to the new arrangements before to this, for example if the non-resident parent is also subject to a separate claim made since the new method was introduced. As of December 2005, 930,000 cases (63% of the total) remain under the old rules [9] The percent sign A percentage is a way of expressing numbers as fractions of 100 and is often denoted using the percent sign, %. For example, 45. ...
Net income is equal to the income that a firm has after subtracting costs and expenses from the total revenue. ...
A new computer system, Child Support 2 (CS2) was introduced to replace the Child Support Computer System (CSCS), which was only designed to calculate the old method. However, to date, not all cases have been transferred across; of 68,000 cases under the "old rules" awaiting clearance, 31,000 are still on CSCS. Of those 31,000 cases, 29,000 have been suspended because the non-resident parent was unable to be found.[9] To meet Wikipedias quality standards, this article may require cleanup. ...
Criticism The Independent Case Examiner’s Office was set up in 1997 as an independent body to deal with complaints about the CSA. Three recurring themes are mentioned in multiple annual reports[10], namely delay (51% of complaints in 2004-2005), error (24% of complaints in 2004-2005) and No Action Taken (14% of complaints in 2004-2005). According to Department for Work and Pensions statistics[9], the average length of time for a case to be cleared under the new scheme has increased from an average of 18 days in March 2003, to 287 in December 2005. An annual report is a document which a company presents at its Annual General Meeting for approval by its shareholders. ...
Delay is: In sound effects, any of a class of effect that adds one or more delayed versions of the original signal, to create effects such as echo or flanger. ...
The word error has different meanings in different domains. ...
For the year April 2004 – May 2005, Department for Work and Pensions statistics[9] show an accuracy rate of 75% (new scheme) and 78% (old scheme), a drop from the previous year's 82% and 86%. Interim reports for the current year (April 2005 – May 2006), show an improvement to 83% and 84%, respectively. Accuracy is defined as the "proportion of maintenance decisions (calculations or assessments) carried out in the reporting period that were checked and found to be accurate to the nearest penny." A calculation is a deliberate process for transforming one or more inputs into one or more results. ...
// Definition of assessment Assessment is the process of documenting, usually in measurable terms, knowledge,skills, attitudes and beliefs. ...
A variety of low value coins, including an Irish 2p piece and many U.S. pennies. ...
Assessments based on the same financial criteria can give different results, depending on which rules the case is judged under. Non-resident parents who would pay less under the new rules currently cannot get reassessed, except in special circumstances. While the CSA plan to eventually move everyone to the same system, in the interim different people with the same current situation will pay different amounts, based solely on when the case was first assessed. One father, Mark Cook, whose monthly payments would drop from £250 to £150 if assessed under the new rules, is taking the CSA to the European Court of Human Rights, claiming that this discrepancy amounts to discrimination under Article 14.[11] However, official statistics show that the average weekly liability is more under the new scheme. For the years 2004-2005, the average new scheme liability varied from £24 to £26 per week, whereas the old scheme varied from £19 to £21.[9] European Court of Human Rights building in Strasbourg The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), often referred to informally as the Strasbourg Court, was created to systematise the hearing of human rights complaints against States Parties to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, adopted by...
Manifestations Slavery · Racial profiling Hate speech · Hate crime Lynching · Gay bashing Genocide · Holocaust Ethnocide · Ethnic cleansing Pogrom · Race war Religious persecution Movements Discriminatory Aryanism · Neo-Nazism White/Black supremacy Hate groups · Kahanism Anti-discriminatory Abolitionism Womens/Universal suffrage Civil rights · Gay rights Childrens rights · Youth rights Policies Discriminatory...
In November 2004, the head of the CSA resigned amid widespread criticism of the CSA systems.[12] Sir Archy Kirkwood, chairman of Work and Pensions Committee, described the situation as "a systemic, chronic failure of management right across the totality of the agency."[13] In November 2005, Tony Blair admitted that the CSA is "not properly suited" to its job, amid reports that for every £1.85 that gets through to children, the CSA spend £1 on administration[14]. Later figures showed that it costs the CSA £12m a year to run, more than the £8m it collects from absent parents.[2] For other people of the same name, see Tony Blair (disambiguation) Anthony Charles Lynton Blair (born 6 May 1953)[1] is the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, First Lord of the Treasury, Minister for the Civil Service, Leader of the UK Labour Party, and Member of the UK Parliament...
Even prior to its opening, the CSA was subject to criticism, with MP David Tredinnick describing the CSA as a "sequel to 1984" due to concerns about "CSA Snooping".[2] In February 2006, Work Secretary John Hutton stated that the CSA's performance was "unacceptable", and announced that it would be reviewed.[15] Nineteen Eighty-Four (commonly written as 1984) is a dystopian novel by the English writer George Orwell, published in 1949. ...
The situation eventually got so bad, that on Monday 24th July 2006, the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions John Hutton MP, announced that the CSA was not working and as a result would be axed and replaced by a "smaller, more focused" body.[16] For the Manfred Mann album, see 2006 (album). ...
The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions is a position in the UK cabinet, responsible for the Department for Work and Pensions. ...
The Rt Hon. ...
Outstanding Debt To increase recovery rates of outstanding debt the CSA has outsourced some of its debt to a number of third party debt collection agencies. For other uses, see Debt (disambiguation). ...
A collection agency is a business that pursues payments on debts owed by individuals or businesses. ...
Staff Child Support Agency Board Members (as of June 2006)[17] include: - Stephen Geraghty, Chief Executive
- Richard Arthur, Non-Executive Director and Chair
- Mark Grimshaw, Strategic Programme Director
- Ron Eagle, Information System/Information Technology Director
- Alan Hardy, Finance and Business Assurance Director
- Susan Park, Operations Director
- Ian Pavey, Human Resources Director
- Jonathan Portes, Director of Children and Poverty
- Hilary Reynolds, Client and Stakeholder Relationships Director and Deputy Chief
- John Cross, Non-Executive Director
- Bryan Foss, Non-Executive Director
- Bill Griffiths, Non-Executive Director
- Peter Holden, Non-Executive Director
- Susan Jillings, Non-Executive Director
Notes - ^ The Law relating to Child Support - Department for Work and Pensions
- ^ a b c The troubled history of the CSA BBC News 18 January, 2006
- ^ Gaby Hinsliff. "Fathers get debts write-off in child agency shake-up" (HTML), The Guardian, 2006-07-16. Retrieved on 2006-07-18.
- ^ http://csa.gov.uk/pdf/english/leaflets/old/CSA2008.pdf
- ^ Child support complaints up by a third – BBC News, 3 July 2001.
- ^ CSA 2001 - Child support: For parents who live apart (old rules) (pdf)
- ^ CSL 101 - Child support: For parents who live apart (new rules) (pdf)
- ^ Changes to child support
- ^ a b c d e Child Support Agency Quarterly Summary Statistics: December 2005
- ^ ICE Annual Reports – 2004-2005
- ^ Father takes CSA case to Europe BBC News, July 28, 2004
- ^ CSA chief resigns amid criticism BBC News, November 17, 2004
- ^ 'Basically, it doesn't work' BBC News, November 17, 2004
- ^ CSA not suited to job, says Blair BBC News, 16 November 2005.
- ^ 'Unacceptable' CSA faces overhaul BBC News, 9 February 2006
- ^ 'Child Support Agency to be axed BBC News, 24 July 2006
- ^ Child Support Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2005/06 (PDF). Child Support Agency.
For the Manfred Mann album, see 2006 (album). ...
July 16 is the 197th day (198th in leap years) of the year in the Gregorian Calendar, with 168 days remaining. ...
For the Manfred Mann album, see 2006 (album). ...
July 18 is the 199th day (200th in leap years) of the year in the Gregorian Calendar, with 166 days remaining. ...
See also The Child Support Agency Australia is a Government of Australia agency established in 1988 that administers the child support arrangements where parents do not reside together in Australia It replaced the ad hoc child maintenance system, dealt with by the courts. ...
Shared Care is a term used in health care and social care in Great Britain. ...
External links |
Feeds |
Contact