FACTOID # 89: In the 1990's, nearly half of all arms exported to developing countries came from the United States of America.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Children overboard
Enlarge
The refugee laden SIEV-4, the boat that sparked the affair

The children overboard affair is an Australian political scandal, first appearing on the eve of the 2001 legislative elections. The controversy stemmed from the claim, made by a number of senior Cabinet members, including Prime Minister John Howard, that asylum seekers on board a boat off Christmas Island known as SIEV-4 (abbreviation of Suspected Illegal Entry Vessel) in October 2001 had deliberately thrown their children into the water in an attempt to secure rescue. The Government had argued that greater control of asylum seekers was necessary, and these incidents may have helped public support for greater control. It subsequently spawned a Senate inquiry, which found the claims to be untrue, many investigative journalist reports, and several books.


Most political analysts believe the affair had an advantageous effect for the government. With the election campaign in full swing, voters perceived the incumbent Coalition to be strong on border protection, and the opposition Labor Party to be weak.


Subsequent evidence revealed the claim that the children were thrown overboard to be false. Instead, the pictures were taken during a rescue after the boat had sunk. When this was discovered, Howard claimed that he was acting on the intelligence he was given at the time. It was later revealed that Howard had been told the claims were false on November 7, three days before the election, but chose not to go public with the information. According to the Senate inquiry report[1] (http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/maritime_incident_ctte/report/f04.doc), passengers aboard a number of other SIEV's threatened children, sabotaged their vessels, committed self harm, and in at least one case (that of SIEV-7 on 22 October) actually threw a child overboard, who was subsequently rescued by another asylum seeker.


Later, during August 2004, Michael Scrafton, who had been a senior advisor to the Minister of Defence Peter Reith, came forward to say that John Howard was told that the claims that the children were thrown in the water were false, before Howard claimed later that the children were indeed thrown into the water. The Senate enquiry was reopened.


However, during the reopened inquiry, Scrafton's story came under criticism. For example, one claim of Scrafton's was that he and Howard spoke three times on the telephone, whilst Howard had maintained that they only spoke twice.


Scrafton's revelations and the reopening of the enquiry occurred close to the announcement of the 2004 Federal election. With the Howard reelection campaign's focus on trust, many thought this would be a debilitating blow to their public image. Surprisingly the Coalition was reelected with an increased majority. It has been questioned, with the Liberal's newfound Senate majority whether the inquiry will go ahead.


While the children overboard affair received widespread coverage and discussion within political and media circles and was made a central part of the Australian Labor Party's election campaign, the government maintained that the Australian public was uninterested in the entire affair [2] (http://www.abc.net.au/am/content/2004/s1179098.htm) and appears to have been proven correct [3] (http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5744,11042692%255E12272,00.html) with an emphatic electoral victory.


External links

  • Truth Overboard (http://www.truthoverboard.com) - political website maintained by the Australian Labor Party.
  • Media releases by John Howard on the affair (http://www.pm.gov.au/news/media_releases/index.cfm)
  • Contents of the report of the Senate inquiry (http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/maritime_incident_ctte/report/contents.htm)
  • Scrafton and Howard locked in dispute over children overboard (ABC) (http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2004/s1189730.htm)
  • Indifference can be dangerous (http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/04/07/1017206286982.html?oneclick=true)
  • Senate Select Committee on the Scrafton Evidence (http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/scrafton_ctte/index.htm)

  Results from FactBites:
 
Children overboard affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (855 words)
The refugee laden SIEV-4, the vessel at the centre of the children overboard affair.
The children overboard affair is an Australian political scandal which arose in 2001 when the government claimed that “a number of children had been thrown overboard” from a “suspected illegal entry vessel” (or SIEV) which had been intercepted by HMAS Adelaide off Christmas Island.
The motivation of those allegedly throwing their children overboard, according to those who reported the incident, was to effectively "force" the Royal Australian Navy to rescue the children and their parents.
HREOC Website: National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention (1582 words)
Children in immigration detention do not receive the same rights as other children in Australia because federal and state laws are not in agreement and a breach of state child protection laws is not recognised within these centres.
Alternatively, unaccompanied children who are especially vulnerable, with little protection, limited advocacy, and minimal appropriate support may be accommodated in special quarters, similar to a group home concept with trained "house parents," independent of the Detention Centre management and appointed specifically to look after their interests, and support them through the processes of determination.
Any children, however, will remain vulnerable within a system that does not provide adequate health care, educational and recreational facilities, and where monitoring and early detection procedures that identify the initial signs of stress and trauma are not put in place.
  More results at FactBites »


 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m