FACTOID # 107: At least 9 out 10 Nigerians attend church regularly. Only 4 out of 10 Americans claim to do so.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Croatian Constitutional Court

Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (Croatian: Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske) is not considered as part of the judicial branch but the Court sui generis. It is the interprator and guardian of the Croatian Constitution and considered the highest judicial authority de facto, because it can abolish Supreme Court decisions on human rights breach basis. Sui generis is a (post) Latin expression, literally meaning of its own gender/genus or unique in its characteristics. ... Current Constitution of the Republic of Croatia was adopted by the Parliament of the Republic of Croatia on December 22, 1990. ...

Contents


Powers and responsibilities

Its main task is to decide on the conformity of laws with the Constitution and other regulations with the Constitution and laws.


It decides on constitutional complaints against the individual decisions of governmental bodies, bodies of local and regional self-government and legal entities with public authority, when these decisions violate human rights and fundamental freedoms, as well as the right to local and regional self-government.


Constitutional Court also observes the realization of constitutionality and legality and notify the Croatian Parliament on the instances of unconstitutionality and illegality observed, as well as decides on jurisdictional disputes between the legislative, executive and judicial branches.


The Court decides on the impeachment of the President of the Republic, supervises the constitutionality of the programs and activities of political parties and may ban their work, and supervises the constitutionality and legality of elections and national referenda, and decide on the electoral disputes which are not within the jurisdiction of courts.


Principle

Its principle and most important role is defined in Article 130 of the Croatian Constitution:


The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia shall repeal a law if it finds it to be unconstitutional.


The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia shall repeal or annul any other regulation if it finds it to be unconstitutional or illegal.


Composition

The Constitutional Court consists of thirteen judges elected by the Croatian Parliament for a term of eight years from among notable jurists, especially judges, public prosecutors, lawyers and university professors of law and elects its President for a term of four years.


Current composition:

  • President: Petar Klarić
  • Deputy President: Jasna Omejec

Judges:

  • Marijan Hranjski
  • Mario Kos
  • Ivan Matija
  • Ivan Mrkonjić
  • Željko Potočnjak
  • Agata Račan
  • Emilija Rajić
  • Smiljko Sokol
  • Nevenka Šernhorst
  • Vice Vukojević
  • Milan Vuković

Former presidents:

  • (1991-1999) Jadranko Crnić
  • (1999-2003) Smiljko Sokol

External link

  • The Croatian Constitutional Court

  Results from FactBites:
 
WWW.HR - Constitutional Court (612 words)
Constitutional judicature was introduced in the Republic of Croatia in 1963 and the Constitutional Court began to work in 1964.
Accepting the new constitutional order of 1990, the Constitution of the Republic of Croatia of 22 December 1990 (hereinafter: the Constitution of 1990) established the composition, content and competence of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia (hereinafter: the Constitutional Court).
The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Croatia
Croatia (1208 words)
Hence, the Court concluded that restrictions imposed upon the exercise of the freedom of association by mandatory registration are sought to accomplish legitimate objectives: to protect the rights and freedoms of others and the public order (§11(2) of the European Convention and §16 of the Constitution).
First, the legal avenue that the Court pursued in establishing the permissibility of informal associations may prove to be a useful interim solution for those countries in the region whose laws on associations still fall short of specifically recognizing informal associations.
On the other hand, similarly to the Croatian law which that country’s Constitutional Court used as a rationale to strike down the mandatory registration provision, the Montenegrin Law on Civil Procedure recognizes the right of informal associations to be a party to proceedings at some instances.
  More results at FactBites »


 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m