|
mm-dd-00 (6290 words) |
 | David Letulippe stated that he would like to continue the discussion to the next meeting and asked if anyone had questions, because he felt he would not be able to attend the next meeting. |
| David Letulippe announced that he would like to voluntarily withdraw the application and continue the case at the next meeting after he clarifies the questions presented tonight by meeting with Tom Clark and Chris Parker, and make sure that they all have a clear understanding of what they are actually asking for in the application. |
| David Ruoff stated that he was working on the variance application that was brought to his attention from the last meeting regarding the hardship analysis. |
| 05-16-2002 (4958 words) |
| David Ruoff stated that, given the unique nature of the lot, it is not unreasonable for the applicant to desire a garage. |
| David Ruoff made the motion to grant the variance with the condition that the setback for the enclosed porch be 3’ and the setback for the garage be 4’. |
| David Ruoff stated that he did not think there was a hardship and that they got what they wanted when they originally went to the Planning Board for the subdivision. |
Feeds |
Contact