FACTOID # 174: One in three Italian babies is born by caesarean section.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Discretionary spending

Discretionary spending refers to spending set on a yearly basis by decision of Congress and is part of fiscal policy. Fiscal policy is the economic term which describes the actions of a government in setting the level of public expenditure and how that expenditure is funded. ...


This spending is optional, and in contrast to entitlement programs for which funding is mandatory.


Discretionary spending


Discretionary spending is a term used by economists to talk about the amount of money spent on non-essential things or luxury goods like a holiday to the Bahamas.


Of course what you think is essential other people might think is a luxury. For example if you're a neoconsumer, you're likely to spend more money on things like holidays. But generally items like entertainment, travel, take-away food, luxury cars, cosmetics are not considered essential for your survival.


When the economy goes pear-shaped because of inflation, high petrol costs, terrorism or high levels of unemployment consumers usually cut down on their discretionary spending. If you're a small business that specialises in providing goods and services aimed at this market you're usually the first to get hit.


However, it all comes down to priorities. For example, a US survey showed that when the Iraq war started in 2003, consumers were less likely to cut back on cosmetics, skincare and apparel that made them feel good.


The term's also used in government to talk about spending on 'optional' programs.


source: http://www.abc.net.au/catapult/jargonbuster


  Results from FactBites:
 
Administration’s Proposed Discretionary Spending Caps Represent Unsound and Inequitable Policy, 3/1/04 (2170 words)
In short, the discretionary spending caps of the 1990s were part of a larger program of shared sacrifice that was spread across the population and that played an important role in eliminating the large deficits of that era.
As a result, the stiff cuts in domestic discretionary programs which the proposed caps would lock in would be used not to reduce the deficit, but to finance a modest share of the cost of the tax cuts.
One lesson of the 1990s is that passing large-scale deficit-reduction measures entails putting all parts of the budget on the table and having various Congressional factions agree to accept deficit-reduction measures that affect their favored parts of the budget, in return for the application of such measures to other parts of the budget as well.
  More results at FactBites »


 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m