FACTOID # 144: A three-minute local phone call in Ecuador costs 60 U.S. cents, 60 times as much as in Ukraine, Macedonia, Saudi Arabia, Nepal, or Uzbekistan.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is a federal court with appellate jurisdiction over the following United States district courts:

The court is based at the Thomas F. Eagleton U.S. Courthouse in Saint Louis, Missouri.


Judges

The judges on the court (as of December 3, 2004) are:

(Here circuit judges and senior circuit judges are listed in order of seniority.)


No judgeships are vacant.


External links

  • United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov)
  • Recent opinions from FindLaw (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=8th&navby=year&year=recent)
  • Federal Judicial Center (http://www.fjc.gov/history/home.nsf/usca_08_frm?OpenFrameSet)

  Results from FactBites:
 
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit | SaveROE.com (676 words)
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Foley & Lardner LLP - Publications - Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Lightens Plaintiffs' Burden In Failure-To-Promote ... (734 words)
Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., handed down on March 20, 1998, reversed a lower court's evidentiary rulings in dismissing a plaintiff's claim that she was not promoted due to unlawful gender bias in violation of Title VII, and found instead that the plaintiff had presented enough relevant evidence for a jury to hear her case.
Nevertheless, the trial court still granted the employer's motion and dismissed the case because it found Lyoch had failed, as part of her prima facie case, to identify the qualifications for the positions and adequately show how she met those qualifications at the time the positions were filled.
The Eighth Circuit, however, observing that where promotion criteria are "subjective and secret" they "are particularly easy for an employer to invent in an effort to sabotage a plaintiff's prima facie case and mask discrimination," found that a plaintiff need not bear the same burden as when an employer applies objective criteria to all applicants.
  More results at FactBites »


 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 1022, m