FACTOID # 53: If you thought Antarctica was inhospitable, think again - its land area is only ninety-eight percent ice. Reassuringly, the other 2% is categorised as "barren rock".
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Electronic voting
Electronic voting machine by Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems) used in all Brazilian elections and plebiscites. Photo by Agência Brasil
Electronic voting machine by Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems) used in all Brazilian elections and plebiscites. Photo by Agência Brasil

Electronic voting (also known as e-voting) is a term encompassing several different types of voting, embracing both electronic means of casting a vote and electronic means of counting votes. Image File history File links Mergefrom. ... Direct recording voting machine developed in Brazil and used in 100% of Brazilian elections Election Technology This box:      A direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine records votes by means of a ballot display provided with mechanical or electro-optical components that can be activated by the voter (typically buttons or... Image File history File linksMetadata Download high resolution version (1999x1311, 295 KB) Urna eletrônica que é usada nas eleições brasileiras. ... Image File history File linksMetadata Download high resolution version (1999x1311, 295 KB) Urna eletrônica que é usada nas eleições brasileiras. ... Premier Election Solutions[4], formerly Diebold Election Systems, Inc. ... // Certification of voting machines blackboxvoting. ... An Independent Testing Authority (ITA) is a laboratory certified by the United States-based National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) to test voting systems to the Voting System Standards (VSS) or the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) in the process of certifying voting systems. ... National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) is a National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) program which provides an unbiased third-party test and evaluation program to accredit laboratories in their respective fields to the ISO 17025 standard. ... The Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) are guidelines adopted by the United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC) for the certification of voting systems. ... Election Technology This box:      End-to-end auditable (E2E) systems are a form of Independent Verification. ... The Help America Vote Act was enacted on October 29, 2002. ... Election Technology This box:      Independent verification (IV) systems or Independent Dual Verification (IDV) are voting machines that produce multiple (at lease two) independent auditable records of votes where the second record is used to check the first. ... Election Technology This box:      Secure Electronic Registration and Voting Experiment (SERVE) was an experiment by the Pentagon to allow military personnel to vote in elections in the United States via the Internet. ... Election Technology This box:      The term software independence (SI) was coined by Dr. Ron Rivest, and NIST researcher John Wack. ... A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ... A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ... In software engineering, an acceptance test is the process of the user testing the system and, based on the results, either granting or refusing acceptance of the software/system being tested. ... Election Technology This box:      Various governments require a certification of voting machines. ... Software verification is a broad and complex discipline of software engineering whose goal is to assure that a software fully satisfies all the expected requirements. ... Usability testing is a means for measuring how well people can use some human-made object (such as a web page, a computer interface, a document, or a device) for its intended purpose, i. ... It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into Postal voting. ... Direct recording voting machine developed in Brazil and used in 100% of Brazilian elections Election Technology This box:      A direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine records votes by means of a ballot display provided with mechanical or electro-optical components that can be activated by the voter (typically buttons or... Election Technology This box:      An optical scan or OpScan voting system is an electronic voting system and uses an optical scanner to read paper ballots. ... In U.S. elections, when someone shows up at a polling place to cast a vote, but is not on the list of people who may vote there (is not registered in that precinct, or his registation is otherwise invalid or inaccurate), he may be allowed to cast a provisional... A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ... Election Technology This box:      Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) or Verified Paper Record (VPR) was intended as an independent verification system for voting machines designed to assure voters that their vote was cast correctly, to detect possible election fraud or malfunction, and to provide a means to audit the... There exist various methods through which the ballots cast at an election may be counted, prior to applying a voting system to obtain one or more winners. ... Premier Election Solutions[4], formerly Diebold Election Systems, Inc. ... Sequoia Voting Systems is a company based in California, and one of the largest providers of electronic voting systems in the US. Some of its main competitors are Diebold Election Systems and Election Systems & Software. ... Election Systems & Software (ES&S) is an American company that provides voting services. ... Hart InterCivic Inc. ... Vote redirects here. ...


Electronic voting technology can include punch cards, optical scan voting systems and specialized voting kiosks (including self-contained Direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting systems). It can also involve transmission of ballots and votes via telephones, private computer networks, or the Internet. Punched cards (or Hollerith cards, or IBM cards), are pieces of stiff paper that contain digital information represented by the presence or absence of holes in predefined positions. ... Election Technology This box:      An optical scan or OpScan voting system is an electronic voting system and uses an optical scanner to read paper ballots. ... For the town in France, see Ballots, Mayenne. ... A computer network is a useless group of computers. ...


Electronic voting technology can speed the counting of ballots and can provide improved accessibility for disabled voters. However, there has been controversy, especially in the United States, that electronic voting, especially DRE voting, can facilitate electoral fraud. It has been suggested that Easy Access be merged into this article or section. ... Elections Part of the Politics series Politics Portal This box:      Electoral fraud is illegal interference with the process of an election. ...

Contents

Overview

Electronic voting systems for electorates have been in use since the 1960s[1] when punch card systems debuted. The newer optical scan voting systems allow a computer to count a voter's mark on a ballot. DRE voting machines which collect and tabulate votes in a single machine, are used by all voters in all elections in Brazil, and also on a large scale in India, the Netherlands, Venezuela, and the United States. Internet voting systems have gained popularity and have been used for government elections and referendums in the United Kingdom, Estonia and Switzerland as well as municipal elections in Canada and party primary elections in the United States and France.[2] Election Technology This box:      An optical scan or OpScan voting system is an electronic voting system and uses an optical scanner to read paper ballots. ... Direct recording voting machine developed in Brazil and used in 100% of Brazilian elections Election Technology This box:      A direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine records votes by means of a ballot display provided with mechanical or electro-optical components that can be activated by the voter (typically buttons or...


There are also hybrid systems that include an electronic ballot marking device (usually a touch screen system similar to a DRE) or other assistive technology to print a voter-verifiable paper ballot, then use a separate machine for electronic tabulation. Assistive Technology (AT) is a generic term that includes assistive, adaptive, and rehabilitative devices and the process used in selecting, locating, and using them. ... Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) or Verified Paper Record (VPR) is an independent verification system for voting machines designed to assure voters their vote was cast correctly, detect possible fraud or malfunction, and to provide a system to audit the original system. ...


Paper-based electronic voting system

Sometimes called a "document ballot voting system," paper-based voting systems originated as a system where votes are cast and counted by hand, using paper ballots. With the advent of electronic tabulation came systems where paper cards or sheets could be marked by hand, but counted electronically. These systems included punch card voting, marksense and later digital pen voting systems. A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ... There exist various methods through which the ballots cast at an election may be counted, prior to applying a voting system to obtain one or more winners. ... There exist various methods through which the ballots cast at an election may be counted, prior to applying a voting system to obtain one or more winners. ... A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ... Election Technology This box:      An optical scan or OpScan voting system is an electronic voting system and uses an optical scanner to read paper ballots. ... Election Technology This box:      An optical scan or OpScan voting system is an electronic voting system and uses an optical scanner to read paper ballots. ...


Most recently, these systems can include an Electronic Ballot Marker (EBM), that allow voters to make their selections using an electronic input device, usually a touch screen system similar to a DRE. Systems including a ballot marking device can incorporate different forms of assistive technology. A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ... Nintendo DS Touch screen A touch screen is an input/output device that allows the user to interact with the computer by touching the display screen. ... Assistive Technology (AT) is a generic term that includes assistive, adaptive, and rehabilitative devices and the process used in selecting, locating, and using them. ...


Direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting system

Further information: DRE voting machine

A direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine records votes by means of a ballot display provided with mechanical or electro-optical components that can be activated by the voter (typically buttons or a touchscreen); that processes data with computer software; and that records voting data and ballot images in memory components. After the election it produces a tabulation of the voting data stored in a removable memory component and as printed copy. The system may also provide a means for transmitting individual ballots or vote totals to a central location for consolidating and reporting results from precincts at the central location. These systems use a precinct count method that tabulates ballots at the polling place. They typically tabulate ballots as they are cast and print the results after the close of polling.[3] Direct recording voting machine developed in Brazil and used in 100% of Brazilian elections Election Technology This box:      A direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine records votes by means of a ballot display provided with mechanical or electro-optical components that can be activated by the voter (typically buttons or... A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ... For the town in France, see Ballots, Mayenne. ... Touchscreens are display overlays which have the ability to display and receive information on the same screen. ... The terms storage (U.K.) or memory (U.S.) refer to the parts of a digital computer that retain physical state (data) for some interval of time, possibly even after electrical power to the computer is turned off. ...


In 2002, in the United States, the Help America Vote Act mandated that one handicapped accessible voting system be provided per polling place, which most jurisdictions have chosen to satisfy with the use of DRE voting machines, some switching entirely over to DRE. In 2004, 28.9% of the registered voters in the United States used some type of direct recording electronic voting system, up from 7.7% in 1996.[4] The Help America Vote Act was enacted on October 29, 2002. ...


Public network DRE voting system

A public network DRE voting system is an election system that uses electronic ballots and transmits vote data from the polling place to another location over a public network. Vote data may be transmitted as individual ballots as they are cast, periodically as batches of ballots throughout the election day, or as one batch at the close of voting. This includes Internet voting as well as telephone voting.


Public network DRE voting system can utilize either precinct count or central count method. The central count method tabulates ballots from multiple precincts at a central location.


Internet voting can use remote locations (voting from any Internet capable computer) or can use traditional polling locations with voting booths consisting of Internet connected voting systems.


Corporations and organizations routinely use Internet voting to elect officers and Board members and for other proxy elections. Internet voting systems have been used privately in many modern nations and publicly in the United States, the UK, Ireland, Switzerland and Estonia. In Switzerland, where it is already an established part of local referendums, voters get their passwords to access the ballot through the postal service. Most voters in Estonia can cast their vote in local and parliamentary elections, if they want to, via the Internet, as most of those on the electoral roll have access to an e-voting system, the largest run by any European Union country. It has been made possible because most Estonians carry a national identity card equipped with a computer-readable microchip and it is these cards which they use to get access to the online ballot. All a voter needs is a computer, an electronic card reader, their ID card and its PIN, and they can vote from anywhere in the world. Estonian e-votes can only be cast during the days of advance voting. On election day itself people have to go to polling stations and fill in a paper ballot. An advance poll (also advance voting) is held in some elections to allow participation by voters who may not be able to vote on the set election day(s). ...


Analysis of electronic voting

Electronic voting systems may offer some advantages over traditional voting techniques. An electronic voting system can be involved in any one of a number of steps in distributing, voting, collecting, and counting ballots, and thus may or may not introduce advantages into any of these steps.


Charles Stewart of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology estimates that 1 million more ballots were counted in 2004 than in 2000 because electronic voting machines detected votes that paper-based machines would have missed.[5] “MIT” redirects here. ...


In May 2004 the U.S. Government Accountability Office released a report titled "Electronic Voting Offers Opportunities and Presents Challenges"[6], analyzing both the benefits and concerns created by electronic voting. A second report was released in September 2005 detailing some of the concerns with electronic voting, and ongoing improvements, titled "Federal Efforts to Improve Security and Reliability of Electronic Voting Systems Are Under Way, but Key Activities Need to Be Completed"[7]. General Accounting Office headquarters, Washington, D.C. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) is the non-partisan audit, evaluation, and investigative arm of Congress, and an agency in the Legislative Branch of the United States Government. ...


Others also challenge the use of electronic voting from a theoretical point of view, arguing that humans are not equipped for verifying operations occurring within an electronic machine and that because people cannot verify these operations, the operations cannot be trusted. Furthermore, some computing experts have argued for the broader notion that people cannot trust any programming they did not author.[8]


Under a secret ballot system, there is no known input, nor any expected output with which to compare electoral results. Hence, electronic electoral results and thus the accuracy, honesty and security of the entire electronic system cannot be verified by humans.[9].


Critics of electronic voting, including security analyst Bruce Schneier, note that "computer security experts are unanimous on what to do (some voting experts disagree, but it is the computer security experts who need to be listened to; the problems here are with the computer, not with the fact that the computer is being used in a voting application)...DRE machines must have a voter-verifiable paper audit trails... Software used on DRE machines must be open to public scrutiny"[10] to ensure the accuracy of the voting system. Verifiable ballots are necessary because computers can and do malfunction, and because voting machines can be compromised. Bruce Schneier Bruce Schneier (born January 15, 1963) is an American cryptographer, computer security specialist, and writer. ...


Electronic ballots

Electronic voting systems may use electronic ballots to store votes in computer memory. Systems which use them exclusively are called DRE voting systems. When electronic ballots are used there is no risk of exhausting the supply of ballots. Additionally, these electronic ballots remove the need for printing of paper ballots, a significant cost.[11] When administering elections in which ballots are offered in multiple languages (in some areas of the United States, public elections are required by the National Voting Rights Act of 1965), electronic ballots can be programmed to provide ballots in multiple languages for a single machine. The advantage with respect to ballots in different languages appears to be unique to electronic voting. For example, King County, Washington's demographics require them under U.S. federal election law to provide ballot access in Chinese. With any type of paper ballot, the county has to decide how many Chinese-language ballots to print, how many to make available at each polling place, etc. Any strategy that can assure that Chinese-language ballots will be available at all polling places is certain, at the very least, to result in a significant number of wasted ballots. (The situation with lever machines would be even worse than with paper: the only apparent way to reliably meet the need would be to set up a Chinese-language lever machine at each polling place, few of which would be used at all.) The terms storage (U.K.) or memory (U.S.) refer to the parts of a digital computer that retain physical state (data) for some interval of time, possibly even after electrical power to the computer is turned off. ... The National Voting Rights Act of 1965 ()[1] outlawed the requirement that would-be voters in the United States take literacy tests to qualify to register to vote, and it provided for federal registration of voters in areas that had less than 50% of eligible minority voters registered. ... King County redirects here; you may be looking for King County, Texas. ...


Critics argue the need for extra ballots in any language can be mitigated by providing a process to print ballots at voting locations. They argue further, the cost of software validation, compiler trust validation, installation validation, delivery validation and validation of other steps related to electronic voting is complex and expensive, thus electronic ballots aren't guaranteed to be less costly than printed ballots.


Accessibility

A Hart eSlate DRE voting machine with jelly buttons for people with manual dexterity disabilities.
A Hart eSlate DRE voting machine with jelly buttons for people with manual dexterity disabilities.

Electronic voting machines can be made fully accessible for persons with disabilities. Punchcard and optical scan machines are not fully accessible for the blind or visually impaired, and lever machines can be difficult for voters with limited mobility and strength.[12]Electronic machines can use headphones, sip and puff, foot petals, joy sticks and other adaptive technology to provide the necessary accessibility. Image File history File links No higher resolution available. ... Image File history File links No higher resolution available. ... Adaptive technology is the name for products which help people who cannot use regular versions of products, primarily people with physical disabilities such as blindness, deafness and inability to walk or use arms. ... It has been suggested that Easy Access be merged into this article or section. ...


Organizations such as the Verified Voting Foundation have criticized the accessibility of electronic voting machines[13] and advocate alternatives. Some disabled voters (including the visually impaired) could use a tactile ballot, a ballot system using physical markers to indicate where a mark should be made, to vote a secret paper ballot. These ballots can be designed identically to those used by other voters.[14]. However, other disabled voters (including voters with dexterity disabilities) could be unable to use these ballots. The Verified Voting Foundation is a A 501(c)(3) educational nonprofit organization, while VerifiedVoting. ...


Cryptographic verification

Electronic voting systems can offer solutions that allow voters to verify their vote is recorded and tabulated with mathematical calculations. These systems can alleviate concerns of incorrectly recorded votes.


One feature to mitigate such concerns could be to allow a voter to prove how they voted, with some form of electronic receipt, signed by the voting authority using digital signatures. This feature can conclusively prove the accuracy of the tally, but any verification system that cannot guarantee the anonymity of voter's choice, can enable voter intimidation or vote selling. In cryptography, digital signatures are a method of authenticating digital information often treated, sometimes too closely, as analogous to a physical signature on paper. ... Electoral fraud is the deliberate interference with the process of an election. ... Elections Part of the Politics series Politics Portal This box:      Electoral fraud is illegal interference with the process of an election. ...


Some cryptographic solutions aim to allow the voter to verify their vote personally, but not to a third party. One such way would be to provide the voter with a digitally signed receipt of their vote as well as receipts of other randomly selected votes. This would allow only the voter to identify her vote, but not be able to prove her vote to anyone else. Furthermore, each vote could be tagged with a randomly generated voting session id, which would allow the voter to check that the vote was recorded correctly in a public audit trail of the ballot.


Voter intent

Electronic voting machines are able to provide immediate feedback to the voter detecting such possible problems as undervoting and overvoting which may result in a spoiled ballot. This immediate feedback can be helpful in successfully determining voter intent. A spoiled ballot is a ballot which uncountable for the election in question using the applicable vote counting system. ...


Transparency

It has been alleged by groups such as the UK-based Open Rights Group[15] that a lack of testing, inadequate audit procedures, and insufficient attention given to system or process design with electronic voting leaves "elections open to error and fraud". The Open Rights Group (ORG) is a UK-based organisation that hopes to preserve digital rights and freedoms by serving as a hub for other cyber-rights groups campaigning on similar digital rights issues. ...


Audit trails and auditing

Further information: Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail, and End-to-End Auditable Voting Systems

A fundamental challenge with any voting machine is assuring the votes were recorded as cast and tabulated as recorded. Non-document ballot voting systems can have a greater burden of proof. This is often solved with an independently auditable system, sometimes called an Independent Verification, that can also be used in recounts or audits. These systems can include the ability for voters to verify how their votes were cast or further to verify how their votes were tabulated. Election Technology This box:      Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) or Verified Paper Record (VPR) was intended as an independent verification system for voting machines designed to assure voters that their vote was cast correctly, to detect possible election fraud or malfunction, and to provide a means to audit the... Election Technology This box:      End-to-end auditable (E2E) systems are a form of Independent Verification. ... A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ... A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ...


A discussion draft argued by researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) states, "Simply put, the DRE architecture’s inability to provide for independent audits of its electronic records makes it a poor choice for an environment in which detecting errors and fraud is important."[16] The report does not represent the official position of NIST, and misinterpretations of the report has led NIST to explain that "Some statements in the report have been misinterpreted. The draft report includes statements from election officials, voting system vendors, computer scientists and other experts in the field about what is potentially possible in terms of attacks on DREs. However, these statements are not report conclusions."[17] NIST logo The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, formerly known as The National Bureau of Standards) is a non-regulatory agency of the United States Department of Commerce’s Technology Administration. ...

A Diebold Election Systems, Inc. model AccuVote-TSx DRE voting machine with VVPAT attachment.

Various technologies can be used to assure voters that their vote was cast correctly, detect possible fraud or malfunction, and to provide a means to audit the original machine. Some systems include technologies such as cryptography (visual or mathematical), paper (kept by the voter or only verified), audio verification, and dual recording or witness systems (other than with paper). Image File history File links Desi_accuvote-tsx_vvpat. ... Image File history File links Desi_accuvote-tsx_vvpat. ...


Dr. Rebecca Mercuri, the creator of the Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) concept (as described in her Ph.D. dissertation in October 2000 on the basic voter verifiable ballot system), proposes to answer the auditability question by having the voting machine print a paper ballot or other paper facsimile that can be visually verified by the voter before being entered into a secure location. Subsequently, this is sometimes referred to as the "Mercuri method." To be truly voter-verified, the record itself must be verified by the voter and able to be done without assistance, such as visually or audibly. If the voter must use a bar-code scanner or other electronic device to verify, then the record is not truly voter-verifiable, since it is actually the electronic device that is verifying the record for the voter. VVPAT is the form of Independent Verification most commonly found in elections in the United States. Rebecca Mercuri is among the foremost experts on electronic voting. ... Election Technology This box:      Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) or Verified Paper Record (VPR) was intended as an independent verification system for voting machines designed to assure voters that their vote was cast correctly, to detect possible election fraud or malfunction, and to provide a means to audit the... The Mercuri method refers to the process of displaying a Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail under glass or clear plastic so that the voter may not walk out of the polling place with it. ... Federal courts Supreme Court Circuit Courts of Appeal District Courts Elections Presidential elections Midterm elections Political Parties Democratic Republican Third parties State & Local government Governors Legislatures (List) State Courts Local Government Other countriesAtlas  Politics Portal      The United States has a federal government, with elected officials at federal (national), state and...


End-to-end auditable voting systems can provide the voter with a receipt she can take home. This receipt does not allow her to prove to others how she voted, but it does allow her to verify that her vote is included in the tally, all votes were cast by valid voters, and the results are tabulated correctly. End-to-end (E2E) systems include Punchscan and ThreeBallot. These systems have not yet been used in U.S. elections. Election Technology This box:      End-to-end auditable (E2E) systems are a form of Independent Verification. ... Punchscan is an optical scan voting system invented by cryptographer David Chaum and is designed to offer integrity, privacy, and transparency. ... A sample ThreeBallot multi-ballot, with a first race for President with candidates Jones, Smith, and Wu and a second race for Senator with candidates Yip and Zinn. ...


Systems that allow the voter to prove how they voted are never used in U.S. public elections, and are outlawed by most state constitutions. The primary concerns with this solution are voter intimidation and vote selling. Electoral fraud is the deliberate interference with the process of an election. ... Elections Part of the Politics series Politics Portal This box:      Electoral fraud is illegal interference with the process of an election. ...


An audit system can be used in measured random recounts to detect possible malfunction or fraud. With the VVPAT method, the paper ballot is often treated as the official ballot of record. In this scenario, the ballot is primary and the electronic records are used only for an initial count. In any subsequent recounts or challenges, the paper, not the electronic ballot, would be used for tabulation. Whenever a paper record serves as the legal ballot, that system will be subject to the same benefits and concerns as any paper ballot system.


To successfully audit any voting machine, a strict chain of custody is required. The chain of custody is a concept in jurisprudence which applies to the handling of evidence and its integrity. ...


Hardware

Critics, such as the group "Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet" ("We do not trust voting machines"), charge that foreign hardware could be inserted into the machine, using a man in the middle attack technique, and call for DRE machines to be physically sealed.[18] This claim is countered by the position that review and testing procedures can detect fraudulent code or hardware, if such things are present, and that a thorough, verifiable chain of custody would prevent the insertion of such hardware or software. For other uses, see Hardware (disambiguation). ... In cryptography, a man in the middle attack (MITM) is an attack in which an attacker is able to read, insert and modify at will, messages between two parties without either party knowing that the link between them has been compromised. ... The chain of custody is a concept in jurisprudence which applies to the handling of evidence and its integrity. ...


Software

Security experts, such as Bruce Schneier, have demanded that voting machine source code should be publicly available for inspection.[19] Others have also suggested publishing voting machine software under an free software license like it is done in Australia.[20] Bruce Schneier Bruce Schneier (born January 15, 1963) is an American cryptographer, computer security specialist, and writer. ... Source code (commonly just source or code) is any series of statements written in some human-readable computer programming language. ... Free software is software which grants recipients the freedom to modify and redistribute the software. ...


Testing and Certification

See also Certification of voting machines // Certification of voting machines blackboxvoting. ...


One method to any error with voting machines is parallel testing, which are conducted on the Election Day with randomly picked machines. The ACM published a study showing that, to change the outcome of the 2000 U.S. Presidential election, only 2 votes in each precinct would have needed to been changed.[21] The Association for Computing Machinery, or ACM, was founded in 1947 as the worlds first scientific and educational computing society. ...


Other

Criticisms can be mitigated by review and testing procedures to detect fraudulent code or hardware, if such things are present, and thorough a verifiable chain of custody to prevent the insertion of such hardware or software. The chain of custody is a concept in jurisprudence which applies to the handling of evidence and its integrity. ...


Benefits can include reduced tabulation times and an increase of participation (voter turnout), particularly through the use of Internet voting. Voters lining up outside a Baghdad polling station during the 2005 Iraqi election. ...


Those in opposition suggest alternate vote counting systems, citing Switzerland (as well as many other countries), which uses paper ballots exclusively, suggesting that electronic voting is not the only means to get a rapid count of votes. A country of a little over 7 million people, Switzerland publishes a definitive ballot count in about six hours. In villages, the ballots are even counted manually. There exist various methods through which the ballots cast at an election may be counted, prior to applying a voting system to obtain one or more winners. ...


Critics also note that it becomes difficult or impossible to verify the identity of a voter remotely, and that the introduction of public networks become more vulnerable and complex.


It is not yet clear whether the total cost of ownership with electronic voting is lower than other systems. Total cost of ownership (TCO) is a financial estimate designed to help consumers and enterprise managers assess direct and indirect costs commonly related to software or hardware. ...


Electronic voting examples

Australia

In 2007 Australian Defence Force and Defence civilian personnel deployed on operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Timor Leste and the Solomon Islands will have the opportunity to vote via Internet with an Australian Electoral Commission pilot project.[22]


Approximately 300,000 impaired Australians will vote independently for the first time in the 2007 elections. The Australian Electoral Commission has decided to implement voting machines in 29 locations.[23] A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ...


In October of 2001 electronic voting was used for the first time in an Australian parliamentary election. In that election, 16,559 voters (8.3% of all votes counted) cast their votes electronically at polling stations in four places. [24] The Victorian State Government introduced electronic voting on a trial basis for the 2006 State election. [25]


Belgium

Electronic voting in Belgium started in 1991. It is widely used in Belgium for general and municipal elections and has been since 1999. Electronic Voting in Begium started in 1991 where two locations were choosen to experiment on different electronic voting systems. ...


Brazil

Electronic voting in Brazil was introduced in 1996, when the first tests were carried in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. Since 2000, all Brazilian elections have been fully electronic. By the 2000 and 2002 elections more than 400 thousand electronic voting machines were used nationwide in Brazil and the results were tallied electronically within minutes after the polls closed.[24] Joao Abud Jr. who was with the original Brazilian company and has served as president of Diebold Procom Industria Electronica since April 2003, has been promoted to vice president of the company's Latin American Division. Brazil elects on the national level a head of state – the president – and a legislature. ...


Canada

Electronic voting in Canada has been used since at least the 1990s at the municipal level in many cities, and there are increasing efforts in a few areas to introduce it at a provincial level. It is a common misconception that there is no electronic voting in Canada. ...


In the Canadian Province of Ontario, from November 5 to November 10 2003, 12 municipalities from the Prescott Russell and Stormont Dundas & Glengarry Counties held the first full municipal and school board electronic elections in North America using either the Internet or the phone but no paper ballots.[24]


Peterborough, Ontario used Internet voting in 2006 in addition to the paper ballots.[26] Nickname: Motto: Dat natura, elaborant artes (Nature Provides, Industry Develops) Map of Ontario with Peterborough indicated with a red dot Coordinates: Country Canada  Province Ontario  County Peterborough County Established 1819 - Scotts Plains Incorporated as town 1850 - Peterborough Incorporated as city July 1, 1905 Government  - Mayor Paul Ayotte  - MP Dean... Motto: Ut Incepit Fidelis Sic Permanet (Latin: Loyal she began, loyal she remains) Capital Toronto Largest city Toronto Official languages English (de facto) Government Lieutenant-Governor David C. Onley Premier Dalton McGuinty (Liberal) Federal representation in Canadian Parliament House seats 107 Senate seats 24 Confederation July 1, 1867 (1st) Area... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday of the Gregorian calendar. ...


Estonia

Electronic voting in Estonia began in October 2005 local elections when Estonia became the first country to have legally binding general elections using the Internet as a means of casting the vote and was declared a success by the Estonian election officials. The idea of having electronic voting in Estonia came up in early 2001 and quickly gained popularity among figureheads of the then proactively e-minded coalition government of the small Northern-Eastern-European country. ...


In 2007 Estonia held its and the world's first National Internet election. Voting was available from February 26 to 28.[27] A total of 30,275 citizens used Internet voting.[28]


EU CyberVote Project

In September 2000, the European Commission launched the CyberVote project with the aim of demonstrating "fully verifiable on-line elections guaranteeing absolute privacy of the votes and using fixed and mobile Internet terminals".[24]


Trials were performed in Sweden, France, and Germany.[29]


France

In January 2007 France's UMP party held a national presidential primary using both remote electronic voting and with 750 polling stations using touch screen electronic voting over the Internet. The election resulted in over 230,000 votes representing a near 70% turnout.[30] The Union for a Popular Movement (Union pour un Mouvement Populaire, UMP), is the main French centre-right political party. ...


Elections in France utilized remote Internet voting for the first time in 2003 when French citizens living in the United States elected their representatives to the Assembly of the French Citizens Abroad. Over 60% of voters chose to vote using the Internet rather than paper. The Forum des droits sur l'Internet (Internet rights forum), published a recommendation on the future of electronic voting in France, stating that French citizens abroad should be able to use Internet voting for Assembly of the French Citizens Abroad elections.[31] France is a representative democracy. ...


Germany

In Germany the only accredited voting machines after testing by the PTB http://www.berlin.ptb.de/8/85/851/votingmachines.htm for national and local elections are the ESD1 and ESD2 from the Dutch company Nedap. About 2000 of them have been used in the 2005 Bundestag elections covering approximately 2 million voters.[32] These machines differ only in certain details due to different voting systems from the ES3B hacked by a Dutch citizen group and the CCC on 5. October 2006.[33][34] Because of this, additional security measures have been applied in the municipality elections on 22. October 2006 in Cottbus, like reading the software from the EPROM to compare it with the original and sealing the machines afterwards.[35] The city Cottbus later decided not to buy Nedap voting computers.[36] Nedap (N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek) is a dutch company buidling voting machine among other electronic solutions. ... Type Lower house President of the Bundestag Dr. Norbert Lammert, CDU since October 18, 2005 Members 614 Political groups (as of September 18, 2005 elections) Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union of Bavaria Bloc (226), Social Democratic Party of Germany (222), Free Democratic Party (61), The Left Party. ... A voting system is a means of choosing between a number of options, based on the input of a number of voters. ... The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) is one of the biggest and most influential hacker organisations. ... Cottbus (Sorbian: Chośebuz, archaic German: Kottbus) is a city in Brandenburg, Germany, situated around 125 km southeast of Berlin on the Spree river. ... EPROM. The small quartz window admits UV light during erasure. ... This article is about the authentication means. ...


At the moment there are several lawsuits in court against the use of electronic voting machines in Germany.[37][38] One of these reached the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany in February 2007.[39] The plaintiffs are missing the transparency if the voting computers store the votes as intended by the voter and the possibility of a recount because the certified Nedap machines are DRE systems without a paper trail. The Bundesverfassungsgericht The Federal Constitutional Court (in German: Bundesverfassungsgericht, BVerfG) is a special court established by the German constitutional document, the Grundgesetz (Basic Law). ... Nedap (N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek) is a dutch company buidling voting machine among other electronic solutions. ... Direct recording voting machine developed in Brazil and used in 100% of Brazilian elections Election Technology This box:      A direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine records votes by means of a ballot display provided with mechanical or electro-optical components that can be activated by the voter (typically buttons or... Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) or Verified Paper Record (VPR) is an independent verification system for voting machines designed to assure voters their vote was cast correctly, detect possible fraud or malfunction, and to provide a system to audit the original system. ...


In the 2008 state elections of Hamburg an optical scan voting system based on digital paper will be used.[40][41] This article is about the city in Germany. ... Election Technology This box:      An optical scan or OpScan voting system is an electronic voting system and uses an optical scanner to read paper ballots. ... Digital paper, also known as interactive paper, is patterned paper used in conjunction with a digital pen to create handwritten digital documents. ...


India

Electronic voting in India was first introduced in 1982 and was used on an experimental basis in the North Parur assembly constituency in the State of Kerala. However the Supreme Court of India struck down this election as against the law in A C Jose v. Sivan Pillai case. Amendments were made to the Representation of Peoples Act to legalise elections using Electronic Voting Machines. In 2003, all state elections and by-elections were held using EVMs.[24] This does not adequately cite its references or sources. ... A by-election or bye-election is a special election held to fill a political office when the incumbent has died or resigned. ...


Ireland

Ireland bought voting computers from the Dutch company Nedap for about 50 million euro. The machines were used on a 'pilot' basis in some constituencies in two elections in 2002. Due to campaigning by ICTE, Joe McCarthy, and the work of the Commission on Electronic Voting, the machines have not been used since, and their future is uncertain. [42] Nedap (N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek) is a dutch company buidling voting machine among other electronic solutions. ...


See also Electronic voting in Ireland The Irish government had made plans to introduce nationwide electronic voting for the local and European Parliament elections in 2004. ...


Italy

On the 9th and 10th of April 2006 the Italian municipality of Cremona used Nedap Voting machines during the national elections. The pilot involved 3000 electors and 4 polling stations were equipped with Nedap systems. The electoral participation was very high and the pilot was successful.[43]


During the same elections (April 2006) the Ministry of New Technologies in cooperation with two big American companies organized a pilot only concerning e-counting. The experiment involved four regions and it cost 34 million of euro.[citation needed]


Netherlands

Since the late nineties, voting machines are used extensively during elections. Most areas in the Netherlands use electronic voting in polling places. The most widely used voting machines are produced by the company Nedap.[44] In the parliamentary elections of 2006, 21,000 persons will be using the RIES Internet voting system to cast their vote. Nedap (N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek) is a dutch company buidling voting machine among other electronic solutions. ...


On 5. October 2006 the group "Wij vertrouwen stemcomputers niet" ("We do not trust voting machines") demonstrated on Dutch television how the Nedap ES3B machines could be manipulated in 5 minutes. The exchange of the software would not be recognisable by voters or election officials. [45] [46]


Apparently there was a case of an election official misinforming voters of when their vote is recorded and later recording it himself during municipality elections in Landerd, Netherlands in 2006. A candidate was also an election official and got the unusual amount of 181 votes in the polling place where he was working. In the other three polling places together he got 11 votes. [47] Only circumstantial evidence could be found because the voting machine was a direct-recording electronic voting machine, in a poll by a local newspaper the results were totally different. The case is still under prosecution.[48] Landerd is a municipality in the southern Netherlands. ... Circumstantial evidence is lesbian sex with a huge glass dildo unrelated facts that, when considered together, can be used to infer a conclusion about something unknown. ... Direct recording voting machine developed in Brazil and used in 100% of Brazilian elections Election Technology This box:      A direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine records votes by means of a ballot display provided with mechanical or electro-optical components that can be activated by the voter (typically buttons or...


Van Eck phreaking might also compromise the secrecy of the votes in an election using electronic voting. This made the Dutch government ban the use of computer voting machines manufactured by SDU in the 2006 national elections, fearing that secret ballots may not be kept secret. [49] Van Eck phreaking is the process of eavesdropping on the contents of a CRT display by detecting its electromagnetic emissions. ... Elections Part of the Politics series Politics Portal This box:      The secret ballot is a voting method in which a voters choices are confidential. ...

See also: Dutch general election, 2006: Voting machine controversy

In September 2007 a committee chaired by Korthals Altes reported for the government that it would be better to return to paper voting. The deputy minister for interior Bijleveld said in a first response she would accept the committee's advice, and ban electronic voting. The committee also concluded that the time wasn't ready for voting over Internet.[50] State secretary Ank Bijleveld responded by announcing a return to paper voting.[citation needed]. It was reported in September 2007 that "a Dutch judge has declared the use of Nedap e-voting machines in recent Dutch elections unlawful." [51] Dutch Tweede Kamer seats as of 2006 The 2006 Dutch general elections were held in the Netherlands on Wednesday, November 22, 2006, and followed the call for new elections after the fall of the Second Balkenende cabinet. ... Frederik Frits Korthals Altes (born 1931) is a Dutch politician, who served as justice minister (1982-1989) during the first and second cabinets of prime minister Ruud Lubbers. ... Anna Theodora Berandrina (Ank) Bijleveld-Schouten (IJmuiden, 17 March 1962) is a Dutch politician. ... Anna Theodora Bernardina (Ank) Bijleveld-Schouten (IJsselmuiden, 17 March 1962) is a Dutch politician. ...


Norway

The Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development of Norway carried out pilots in three municipalities at local elections in 2003 on voting machines in the polling stations using touch screens.[24]


Romania

Romania first implemented electronic voting systems in 2003[52], on a limited basis, to extend voting capabilities to soldiers and others serving in Iraq, and other theaters of war. Despite the publicly stated goal of fighting corruption, the equipment was procured and deployed in less than 30 days[53] after the government edict passed.


Switzerland

Several cantons (Geneva, Neuchâtel and Zürich) have developed Internet voting test projects to allow citizens to vote via the Internet [54]. The Republic and Canton of Geneva is the westernmost canton or state of Switzerland, surrounded on almost all sides by France and centered around the city of Geneva. ... Neuch tel is a canton of Switzerland. ... The Swiss canton of Zürich (German: Kanton Zürich) has a population of about 1. ... Voting in Switzerland is the process with which Swiss citizens make decisions about governance and elect officials. ...


United Kingdom

England

Voting pilots have taken place in May 2006, June 2004, May 2003, May 2002, and May 2000.


In 2000, the London Mayoral and Assembly elections were counted using an optical scan voting system with software provided by DRS plc of Milton Keynes. In 2004, the London Mayoral, Assembly and European Parliamentary elections were scanned and processed using optical character recognition from the same company. Both elections required some editing of the ballot design to facilitate electronic tabulation, though they differed only slightly from the previous 'mark with an X' style ballots.[citation needed] Election Technology This box:      An optical scan or OpScan voting system is an electronic voting system and uses an optical scanner to read paper ballots. ... Optical character recognition, usually abbreviated to OCR, is a type of computer software designed to translate images of handwritten or typewritten text (usually captured by a scanner) into machine-editable text, or to translate pictures of characters into a standard encoding scheme representing them (e. ...


Scotland

An optical scan voting system was be used to electronically count paper ballots in the Scottish Parliament general election and Scottish council elections in 2007.[55][56] A report commissioned by the UK Electoral Commission found significant errors in ballot design produced more than 150,000 spoilt votes.[57] Election Technology This box:      An optical scan or OpScan voting system is an electronic voting system and uses an optical scanner to read paper ballots. ... Scottish Parliament general election, 2007 concerns the third general election to the Scottish Parliament, which will be held on May 3, 2007. ... The 2007 Local government elections will be held on 3 May 2007. ... The Electoral Commission is a non-ministerial government department with powers in the United Kingdom, which was created by an Act of Parliament, the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (2000 c. ... In voting, a ballot paper is considered to be spoilt, void, or null if it is regarded by the election authorities to contain irregularities during vote counting, and hence cannot be recorded as a valid vote. ...


Documented problems

  • Fairfax County, Virginia, November 4, 2003. Machines quit, jammed the modems in voting systems when 953 voting machines called in simultaneously to report results, leading to a denial of service incident on the election. 50% of precincts were unable to report results until the following day. Also, some voters complained that they would cast their vote for a particular candidate and the indicator of that vote would go off shortly after. Had they not noticed, their vote for that candidate would have remained uncounted; an unknown number of voters were affected by this.[59]
  • Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems) TSx voting system disenfranchised many voters in Alameda and San Diego Counties during the March 2, 2004 California presidential primary due to non-functional voter card encoders.[60] On April 30 California's secretary of state decertified all touch-screen machines and recommended criminal prosecution of Diebold Election Systems.[61] The California Attorney-General decided against criminal prosecution, but subsequently joined a lawsuit against Diebold for fraudulent claims made to election officials. Diebold settled that lawsuit by paying $2.6 million. [62] On February 17, 2006 the California Secretary of State then recertified Diebold Election Systems DRE and Optical Scan Voting System. [63]
  • Napa County, California, March 2, 2004, an improperly calibrated marksense scanner overlooked 6,692 absentee ballot votes. [1]
  • After the 2004 U.S. presidential election there were allegations of data irregularities and systematic flaws which may have affected the outcome of both the presidential and local elections. See: Voting machine problems in the 2004 United States presidential election
  • On October 30, 2006 the Dutch minister of Home affairs withdrew the license of 1187 voting machines from manufactured SDU, about 10% of the total number to be used, because it was proven by the Dutch National Intelligence Service that one could "listen out" the voting from up to 40 meters using Van Eck phreaking. National elections are to be held 24 days after this decision. The decision was forced by a Dutch grass roots organisation called wijvertrouwenstemcomputersniet which translates to "we don't trust voting computers".
  • Problems in the United States general elections, 2006:
    • During early voting in Miami, Hollywood and Fort Lauderdale, Florida in October of 2006 three votes intended to be recorded for Democratic candidates were displaying as cast for Republican. Election officials attributed it to calibration errors in the touch screen of the voting system.[64]
    • In Pennsylvania, a computer programming error forced some to cast paper ballots. In Indiana, 175 precincts also resorted to paper. Counties in those states also extended poll hours to make up for delays.[65]
    • A file of about 1000 first and second hand incident reports made to a non-partisan hotline that operated the day of the November 7 midterm elections as well as news reports.[66]

In the United States presidential election of 2000 Republican George W. Bush gained the US Presidency over Democrat Al Gore after the United States Supreme Court in Bush v. ... is the 308th day of the year (309th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2003 (MMIII) was a common year starting on Wednesday of the Gregorian calendar. ... A denial-of-service attack (also, DoS attack) is an attack on a computer system or network that causes a loss of service to users, typically the loss of network connectivity and services by consuming the bandwidth of the victim network or overloading the computational resources of the victim system. ... Premier Election Solutions[4], formerly Diebold Election Systems, Inc. ... is the 48th day of the year in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday of the Gregorian calendar. ... Direct recording voting machine developed in Brazil and used in 100% of Brazilian elections Election Technology This box:      A direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine records votes by means of a ballot display provided with mechanical or electro-optical components that can be activated by the voter (typically buttons or... An optical reader is a device found within most computer scanners that captures visual information and translates the image into digital information the computer is capable of understanding and displaying. ... It has been suggested that this article or section be merged into Postal voting. ... After the 2004 U.S. presidential election there were allegations of data irregularities and systematic flaws which may have affected the outcome of both the presidential and local elections. ... is the 303rd day of the year (304th in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday of the Gregorian calendar. ... Van Eck phreaking is the process of eavesdropping on the contents of a CRT display by detecting its electromagnetic emissions. ... Grassroots democracy is the political processes which are driven by groups of ordinary citizens, as opposed to larger organisations or wealthy individuals with concentrated vested interests in particular policies. ... Federal courts Supreme Court Circuit Courts of Appeal District Courts Elections Presidential elections Midterm elections Political Parties Democratic Republican Third parties State & Local government Governors Legislatures (List) State Courts Local Government Other countries Atlas  US Government Portal      The 2006 United States midterm elections were held on Tuesday, November 7, 2006. ... Early voting, or vote banking, not to be confused with absentee voting, allows a voter to cast a ballot in front of an elections official before the official poll date. ...

Recommendations for improvement

In December of 2005 the US Election Assistance Commission unanimously adopted the 2005 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines, which significantly increase security requirements for voting systems and expand access, including opportunities to vote privately and independently, for individuals with disabilities. The guidelines will take effect in December 2007 replacing the 2002 Voting System Standards (VSS) developed by the Federal Election Commission. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) was created by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA). ... The Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) are guidelines adopted by the United States Election Assistance Commission (EAC) for the certification of voting systems. ... The Federal Election Commission (or FEC) is an independent regulatory agency that was founded in 1975 by the United States Congress to regulate the campaign finance legislation in the United States. ...


Some groups such as the Open Voting Consortium believe that to restore voter confidence and to reduce the potential for fraud, all electronic voting systems must be completely available to public scrutiny.


In the summer of 2004, the Legislative Affairs Committee of the Association of Information Technology Professionals issued a nine-point proposal for national standards for electronic voting. [67] In an accompanying article, the committee's chair, Charles Oriez, described some of the problems that had arisen around the country.[68] The Association of Information Technology Professionals (AITP) offers opportunities for Information Technology (IT) leadership and education through partnerships with industry, government and academia. ...


Electronic voting manufacturers

Election Systems & Software (ES&S) is an American company that provides voting services. ... Hart InterCivic Inc. ... Nedap (N.V. Nederlandsche Apparatenfabriek) is a dutch company buidling voting machine among other electronic solutions. ... Premier Election Solutions[4], formerly Diebold Election Systems, Inc. ... Sequoia Voting Systems is a company based in California, and one of the largest providers of electronic voting systems in the US. Some of its main competitors are Diebold Election Systems and Election Systems & Software. ...

See also

A voting machine is a device to record and register votes to be counted as per any voting system, with or without printing a ballot for the voter to verify. ... // Certification of voting machines blackboxvoting. ... Elections Part of the Politics series Politics Portal This box:      Electoral fraud is illegal interference with the process of an election. ... Electoral fraud is the deliberate interference with the process of an election. ... There exist various methods through which the ballots cast at an election may be counted, prior to applying a voting system to obtain one or more winners. ... E-democracy (a neologism and contraction of electronic democracy) is the utilization of electronic communications technologies, such as the Internet, in enhancing democratic processes within a democratic republic or representative democracy. ...

References

  1. ^ Bellis, Mary. The History of Voting Machines. About.com.
  2. ^ REMOTE VOTING TECHNOLOGY, Chris Backert e-Government Consulting
  3. ^ U.S. Election Assistance Commission: 2005 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines
  4. ^ U.S. Federal Election Commission: Direct Recording Electronic - information page
  5. ^ Friel, Brian (November 2006)Let The Recounts Begin, National Journal
  6. ^ Government Accountability Office (May 2004) "Electronic Voting Offers Opportunities and Presents Challenges"
  7. ^ Government Accountability Office (September 2005) "Federal Efforts to Improve Security and Reliability of Electronic Voting Systems Are Under Way, but Key Activities Need to Be Completed"
  8. ^ Thompson, Ken (August 1984) Reflections on Trusting Trust
  9. ^ Lombardi, Emanuele electronic voting and Democracy
  10. ^ Schneier, Bruce {September 2004), openDemocracy What’s wrong with electronic voting machines?
  11. ^ "http://post-journal.com/articles.asp?articleID=6218". The Post-Journal
  12. ^ "Protecting the Integrity and Accessibility of Voting in 2004 and Beyond". People for the American Way
  13. ^ "Disability Access to Voting Systems" Verified Voting Foundation
  14. ^ "Ballot Templates." (tactile ballots) International Foundation for Election Systems
  15. ^ ORG Election Report highlights problems with voting technology used
  16. ^ Requiring Software Independence in VVSG 2007: STS Recommendations for the TGDC
  17. ^ Questions and Answers on the Draft Report: "Requiring Software Independence in VVSG 2007: STS Recommendations for the TGDC"
  18. ^ Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer a security analysis (chapter 7.1)
  19. ^ The Problem with Electronic Voting Machines
  20. ^ The electronic voting and counting system
  21. ^ Di Franco, A., Petro, A., Shear, E., and Vladimirov, V. 2004. Small vote manipulations can swing elections. Commun. ACM 47, 10 (Oct. 2004), 43-45. DOI= http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1022594.1022621
  22. ^ Electronic Voting Trial for Deployed Defence Personnel from the Australian Electoral Commission
  23. ^ Blind and visually impaired will be able to cast secret ballots, Macey, Jennifer. ABC's The World Today
  24. ^ a b c d e f ACE Electoral Knowledge Network
  25. ^ Victorian Electoral Commission Electronic Voting Pilot
  26. ^ City of Peterborough 2006 Municipal Election Website
  27. ^ Estonia to hold first national Internet election, News.com, February 21, 2007
  28. ^ Estonia Scores World Web First In National Polls, InformationWeek February 28, 2007
  29. ^ EU CyberVote project
  30. ^ E-VOTING: French Political Party UMP Makes History!
  31. ^ WHAT IS THE FUTURE OF ELECTRONIC VOTING IN FRANCE?, The Internet rights forum 26 September 2003
  32. ^ efve.eu: Voting computer situation in Germany
  33. ^ Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer, a security analysis
  34. ^ CCC Information on voting computers (German)
  35. ^ Wahlcomputer in Cottbus geprüft und versiegelt (German)
  36. ^ Cottbus verabschiedet sich von Wahlcomputern heise.de, 29 January 2007 (German)
  37. ^ Misstrauen gegen Wahlgeräte: Wahleinspruch in Cottbus ((German)
  38. ^ Informations on Electronic Voting lawsuit by Ulrich Wiesner
  39. ^ Verfassungsklage gegen Wahlcomputer (Heise Hintergrund, February 21, 2007, German)
  40. ^ New Generation of Voting Machines in Germany
  41. ^ Ulrich Wienser, Hacking the Electoral Law, Page 37ff
  42. ^ Cullen rules out use of e-voting in June
  43. ^ Prima sperimentazione voto elettronico con NEDAP in Italia: CREMONA (Italian)
  44. ^ Security of Systems Group of the Nijmegen Institute for Computing and Information Sciences
  45. ^ Nedap/Groenendaal ES3B voting computer, a security analysis
  46. ^ Dutch citizens group cracks Nedap's voting computer
  47. ^ Statement of voting machine manufacturer Nedap (German)
  48. ^ Raadslid Landerd is stuk minder populair in schaduwverkiezing (dutch)
  49. ^ Dutch government scraps plans to use voting computers in 35 cities including Amsterdam (Herald tribune, 30. October 2006)
  50. ^ (Dutch) Rapport adviescommissie inrichting verkiezingsproces, Adviescommissie inrichting verkiezingsproces, September 27, 2007]
  51. ^ Dutch pull the plug on e-voting
  52. ^ Romanian General Inspectorate for Communications and Information Technology
  53. ^ European Commission finding on Romania 2003
  54. ^ http://www.geneve.ch/evoting/english/welcome.asp
  55. ^ "Electronic counting to take over from tellers at elections", The Scotsman, 19 April, 2006
  56. ^ "Green light for DRS & ERS to deliver e-Count for 2007 Scottish Elections", press release, DRS Data Services Limited
  57. ^ Scottish Elections Review from the UK Electoral Commission, October 23, 2007
  58. ^ Florida Primary 2002: Back to the Future
  59. ^ Fairfax To Probe Voting Machines (Washington Post, November 18, 2003)
  60. ^ Greg Lucas, "State bans electronic balloting in 4 counties; Touch-screen firm accused of 'reprehensible,' illegal conduct", San Francisco Chronicle (May 1, 2004) http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/05/01/MNG036EAF91.DTL
  61. ^ Hardy, Michael (Mar. 3, 2004). California nixes e-voting. FCW.com.
  62. ^ Diebold to Settle E-Voting Suit
  63. ^ State of California Secretary of State (February 17, 2006). Approval of use of Diebold Election Systems, Inc.
  64. ^ Test run for voting (Miami Herald, 10/31/2006)
  65. ^ Poll Workers Struggle With E-Ballots
  66. ^ Incident list of the 2006 Mid-Term Elections
  67. ^ "Legislative Committee Resolution Awaiting BOD Approval". (July 2004). Information Executive
  68. ^ Oriez , Charles (July 2004). "In Search of Voting Machines We Can Trust". Information Executive

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) was created by the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA). ... The Federal Election Commission (or FEC) is an independent regulatory agency that was founded in 1975 by the United States Congress to regulate the campaign finance legislation in the United States. ... National Journal is a weekly magazine that provides Insight for Insiders through nonpartisan reporting on the current political environment as well as emerging political and policy trends. ... People For the American Way (PFAW) is a liberal, self described progressive advocacy organization in the United States. ... The Verified Voting Foundation is a A 501(c)(3) educational nonprofit organization, while VerifiedVoting. ... IFES(formerly known as the International Foundation for Election Systems) is an international, non-profit, Washington, DC-based organization that supports the building of democratic societies. Founded in 1987, IFES has 200 employees with field offices in more than 21 countries throughout Asia, Africa, Europe and the Americas. ... AEC logo The Australian Electoral Commission, or the AEC, is the federal government agency in charge of organising and supervising federal elections. ... CNET Networks Inc. ... InformationWeek is a weekly technology magazine published by CMP Media. ... is the 270th day of the year (271st in leap years) in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2007 (MMVII) is the current year, a common year starting on Monday of the Gregorian calendar and the AD/CE era in the 21st century. ... The Scotsmans offices in Edinburgh The Scotsman is a Scottish national newspaper, published in Edinburgh. ... The Electoral Commission is a non-ministerial government department with powers in the United Kingdom, which was created by an Act of Parliament, the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 (2000 c. ... is the 48th day of the year in the Gregorian calendar. ... Year 2006 (MMVI) was a common year starting on Sunday of the Gregorian calendar. ...

External links

Election Administration

NIST logo The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST, formerly known as The National Bureau of Standards) is a non-regulatory agency of the United States Department of Commerce’s Technology Administration. ... The Help America Vote Act was enacted on October 29, 2002. ...

Informational

  • The Election Technology Library research list - A comprehensive list of research relating to technology use in elections.
  • E-Voting information from ACE Project
  • AEI-Brookings Election Reform Project
  • Technical information in areas of Internet security, cryptography, protocols, and online elections
  • Electronic Voting Systems at the Open Directory Project
  • Selker, Ted Scientific American Magazine Fixing the Vote October 2004
  • The Machinery of Democracy: Voting System Security, Accessibility, Usability, and Cost from Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law
  • Electronic Voting Machines ProCon.org - Does the use of electronic voting machines improve the voting process?
  • Who's who in election technology
  • National Committee for Voting Integrity - an EPIC Project
  • EPIC Privacy and Voting Page

The Open Directory Project (ODP), also known as dmoz (from , its original domain name), is a multilingual open content directory of World Wide Web links owned by Netscape that is constructed and maintained by a community of volunteer editors. ... Ted Selker (Edwin Joseph Selker [1]), is an American computer scientist who as of 2005 heads the Context Aware Computing Group at the MIT Media Lab and is the MIT director of The Voting Technology Project and Design Intelligence. ...

Research

  • How to Improve Security in Electronic Voting? Parakh, Abhishek and Kak,Subhash Louisiana State University
  • "Private, Secure And Auditable Internet Voting", by Ed Gerck, in "Secure Electronic Voting", Gritzalis, Dimitris (Ed.), 2003, 240 p. Kluwer/Spring. ISBN-10: 1-4020-7301-1.

For other uses, see LSU. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, generally known as Louisiana State University or LSU, is a public, coeducational university located in Baton Rouge, Louisiana and the main campus of the Louisiana State University System. ...

Advocacy, Commentary, and Criticism

  • Worm attacked voter database in notorious Florida district Computerworld Magazine
  • Electronic Voting Rebecca Mercuri's web site, includes articles, published papers, an e-mail list, and other electronic voting information.
  • E-Voting Failures in the 2006 Mid-Term Elections: In January 2007 three e-voting activist groups published a report based on first and second hand incident reports made to a non-partisan hotline that operated the day of the November 7 midterm elections as well as news reports.
  • Wired: Building a Better Voting Machine
  • Can Electronic Voting Be Trusted?, Wall Street Journal
  • A Center for Correct, Usable, Reliable, Auditable, and Transparent Elections
  • California Voter Foundation
  • Activist Bev Harris's Black Box Voting website
  • Brave New Ballot Avi Rubin's book on the intersection of politics and accurate voting
  • Security expert Bruce Schneier occasionally discusses voting security:
    • Internet Voting vs. Large-Value e-Commerce — Why securing voting is not the same thing as securing financial transactions via the Internet (Bruce Schneier)
    • The Problem with Electronic Voting Machines
    • Major Vulnerability Found in Diebold Election Machines
    • What's Wrong With Electronic Voting Machines?
    • The Problem with Electronic Voting Machines
    • Bruce Schneier: New Voting Protocol
  • David Allen's Black Box Voting website
  • Emanuele Lombardi's "electronic voting and Democracy" website
  • European Association Electronic Libre
  • Jason Kitcat's guide to the pros and cons of e-voting UK-based blogger opposed to eVoting
  • Electronic Voting by the Open Rights Group a UK-based digital rights organisation
  • National Committee for Voting Integrity, a group working to promote verifiable electronic voting
  • Open Voting Consortium Developing free software for electronic voting machines
  • Voter Verified e-voting explained (FREE Project & FIPR)
  • Verified Voting Campaign to Demand Verifiable Election Results
  • Why We Need "Free Software" Voting Machines, by Jeff Nicholson-Owens
  • Free software is not enough on its own, we need paper ballots, by Richard Stallman
  • Analysis finds e-voting machines vulnerable
  • Election Irregularities - Scandals - Vote Fraud - News and links covering the elections.
  • Early discussion of risks of electronic voting - 1986 - and possibly first description of a backup paper ballot design by Professor Tom Benson
  • Rather, Dan, "Dan Rather v. Machine: Rather takes on electronic voting devices in latest investigative report", Boston Metro, August 17, 2007.

  Results from FactBites:
 
Electronic voting - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (1995 words)
Electronic voting (also known as e-voting) is a term encompassing several different types of voting.
Vote data may be transmitted as individual ballots as they are cast, periodically as batches of ballots throughout the election day, or as one batch at the close of voting.
Electronic voting systems can provide the opportunity for voters to not only verify that their vote was cast correctly (as with a VVPAT), but also that their vote was tabulated correctly with mathematical calculations.
Electronic voting in Canada - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (766 words)
While the federal elections still use paper ballots, voting technology has been used since at least the 1990s at the municipal level in many cities, and there are increasing efforts in a few areas to introduce it at a provincial level.
Such a process may not be used for an official vote without the prior approval of the committees of the Senate and of the House of Commons that normally consider electoral matters.
Numerous problems were reported with the voting machines used, and Pierre Bourque of Vision Montreal called for some re-votes.
  More results at FactBites »


 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.