is a theorem, then either φ is a theorem, or ψ is a theorem.
The existence property is satisfied by a logic if whenever
is a theorem, then there is some termt for which φ(t) is a theorem.
The disjunction and existence properties are validated by intuitionistic logic and invalid for classical logic; they are key criteria used in assessing whether a logic is constructive. In particular the existence property is fundamental to understanding in what sense proofs can be considered to have content: the essence of the discussion of existence theorems. The disjunction property is a finitary analogue, in an evident sense. Namely given two or finitely many propositions φi, whose disjunction is true, we want to have an explicit value of the index i such that we have a proof of that particular φi. There are quite concrete examples in number theory where this has a major effect.
It is never a part of that nature, or else the property of existence (the property of being realized by an act of existence) would have to be realized by a further act of existence, which is absurd, leading to an infinite regress of acts of existence.
This Kantian thesis (that existence is not a property) may appear to be inconsistent with al-Farabi's claim that God's essence is identical to His existence, but this is not so.
He demonstrated that existence is not a property, but he did not establish that necessary existence is not a property.