This page has been deleted, and should not be re-created without a good reason.
Please discuss possible changes on the talk page of this article.
Search for Forces of Nature in other articles.
This page may have been deleted as a dictionary definition. If so, you may look for Forces of Nature in Wiktionary, our sister dictionary project.
If you created an article under this title previously, it has been deleted. See candidates for speedy deletion, articles for deletion or this page's entry on articles for deletion (this page's entry on votes for deletion for older entries) for possible reasons.
If you do not receive a response within a reasonable time on this article's talk page, then you may have to check the protection log and contact the administrator who protected the page.
There may be relevant discussion on Votes for undeletion.
If laws of nature were descriptive of the scope and substance of everything that could logically happen, instead of their scope being limited to what can happen naturally (i.e., apart from supernatural interference), then of course miracles would not be possible.
A violation of a law of nature by natural means is what one wants, normatively, to hold as a contradiction in terms — assuming insistence on generality (i.e., nonlocal empirical terms) in the statement of the law.
The counterfactual force that is constitutive of the meaning of some causal statements that specify necessary and sufficient material conditions for some event to occur may indicate the presence of an implicit generalization in the causal statement about a miracle.
Feeds |
Contact