Gestell is a German word used by Twentieth century German philosopherMartin Heidegger to describe a mode of enframing. This concept was applied to Heidegger's exposition of the essence of technology. The conclusion regarding the essence of technology was that technology is fundamentally enframing. As such, the essence of technology is Gestell. Indeed, "Gestell, literally 'framing', is an all-encompassing view of technology, not as a means to an end, but rather a mode of humanexistence." [1] (19th century - 20th century - 21st century - more centuries) Decades: 1900s 1910s 1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s The 20th century lasted from 1901 to 2000 in the Gregorian calendar (often from (1900 to 1999 in common usage). ... These five broad types of question are called analytical or logical, epistemological, ethical, metaphysical, and aesthetic respectively. ... Martin Heidegger (September 26, 1889 â May 26, 1976) was a German philosopher. ... In philosophy, essence is the attribute (or set of attributes) that make an object or substance what it fundamentally is. ... By the mid 20th century humans had achieved a level of technological mastery sufficient to leave the surface of the planet for the first time and explore space. ... [[{{{diversity_link}}}|Diversity]] {{{diversity}}} Binomial name Homo sapiens Linnaeus, 1758 Trinomial name {{{trinomial}}} Type Species {{{type_species}}} Subspecies Homo sapiens idaltu (extinct) Homo sapiens sapiens [[Image:{{{range_map}}}|{{{range_map_width}}}|]] Synonyms {{{synonyms}}} Homo (genus). ... ...
Suffolk Superior Court Judge Allan van Gestel ruled that Rubin and Rudman was aware of a federal kickback investigation of West Lynn Creamery in June 1998 when it issued an opinion letter to Dean Foods indicating that it had no knowledge of any suit or investigation involving the Massachusetts dairy.
In addition to the $7.2 million judgment, van Gestel said Rubin and Rudman also would be responsible for Dean Foods' attorneys fees and costs in resolving the criminal charges against West Lynn Creamery.
Van Gestel ruled against Rubin and Rudman and not the individual attorneys at the firm who played prominent roles in the preparation of the opinion letter.