This article is about the Plato dialogue. For the Greek philosopher, see Gorgias.
Gorgias refers to the last dialogue that Plato wrote before leaving Athens. It features Socrates and Gorgias participating in a microcosm of the sophist-philosopher debate that raged throughout ancient Athens. Whereas the sophists were relativists who believed that rhetoric was a useful tool that could exploit the imperfection of human knowledge, Plato and the philosophers proposed the existence of a transcendental, perfect knowledge. In order to access this higher truth, philosophers utilized the practice of dialectic. Rhetoric, Plato asserted, was a perversion of dialectic that harmed the sould by creating false belief.
It is in this dialogue that Plato offers one of the most famous critiques of rhetoric, calling it a "ghost or counterfeit of a part of politics" and a form of "cookery." In labeling rhetoric a form of cookery, Plato draws an analogy between care for the human body and the management of politics in a society. Just as a doctor uses medicine to heal and protect the body, philosophers can utilize dialectical reasoning to arrive at just decisions that benefit the entire polis. Like a tastey but unhealthy dish, rhetoric delights the common people (or "demos") into pursuing short-term desires at the expense of long-term justice.
The purpose of politics being to establish justice and virtue throughout the whole of society, Plato believed that rhetoric, through its creation of falsehoods, was the root of evil in the Athenian state. His opinion of rhetoric was the logical corollary of his belief that ordinary people did not have the aptitude to govern wisely. This sentiment also formed the basis for his masterpiece The Republic.
And our friend Gorgias is one of the best, and the art in which he is a proficient is the noblest.
Now I think, Gorgias, that you have very accurately explained what you conceive to be the art of rhetoric; and you mean to say, if I am not mistaken, that rhetoric is the artificer of persuasion, having this and no other business, and that this is her crown and end.
Then hear me, Gorgias, for I am quite sure that if there ever was a man who-entered on the discussion of a matter from a pure love of knowing the truth, I am such a one, and I should say the same of you.
Plato's deliberate prevarication of Gorgias and his techn is a consequence of his disdain for Sophists; furthermore, this prejudice is manifest in the dialogue.
Plato's intent to pervert Gorgianic rhetoric is also evident in his decision to force Gorgias into the background of the dialogue, leaving two pathetically incompetent students to defend themselves (and their mentor's philosophy) against the wiser Socrates (Kastely 33).
Plato further misrepresents Gorgianic rhetoric by asserting that rhetoric functions solely as flattery and hence is not concerned with the "greatest good." Plato has Gorgias legitimate this falsification by stating that the rhetorician has the ability to persuade a "crowd" more successfully than an expert (McComiskey 25).