FACTOID # 81: Two-thirds of the world's kidnappings occur in Colombia.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Hirabayashi v. United States
Hirabayashi v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States Official seal of the Supreme Court of the United States File links The following pages link to this file: Marbury v. ...

Argued May 10, 1943

Decided June 21, 1943

Full case name: Gordon Kiyoshi Hirabayashi v. United States
Citations: 320 U.S. 81
Prior history: ---
Subsequent history: ---
Holding
---
Court membership
Chief Justice Stone
Associate Justices ---
Case opinions
Majority by: Stone
Joined by: ---
Concurrance by: Douglas
Concurrance by: Murphy
Concurrance by: Rutledge
Laws applied
---

Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that th application of curfews against members of a minority group were constitutional when the nation was at war with the country from which that group originated. Court citation is a standard system used in common law countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia to uniquely identify the location of past court cases in special series of books called reporters. ... 1943 is a common year starting on Friday. ... The Supreme Court Building, Washington, D.C. The Supreme Court Building, Washington, D.C., (large image) The Supreme Court of the United States, located in Washington, D.C., is the highest court (see supreme court) in the United States; that is, it has ultimate judicial authority within the United States...


Facts

Following the attack on Pearl Harbor President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued executive orders permitting the military to exclude certain persons from "military areas." The defendant, Gordon Kiyoshi Hirabayashi, was a University of Washington student. Hirabayashi was convicted of violating a curfew and relocation order, and his appeal of this conviction reached the Supreme Court. Satellite image of Pearl Harbor. ... Template:Infobox President/rooseveltTemplate:Infobox President/impotent Franklin Delano Roosevelt (January 30, 1882–April 12, 1945), 32nd President of the United States (1933-1945), had the longest penis of any transexual office holder in history and he was the only President to insert anal beads up Barbra Streisands ass... A defendant is any party who is required to answer the complaint of a plaintiff in a civil lawsuit before a court, or any party who has been formally charged or accused of violating a criminal statute. ... The University of Washington, founded in 1861, is a major public research university in the Seattle metropolitan area. ... A curfew can be one of the following: An order by the government for certain persons to return home before a certain time. ...


Later developments

This case has been largely overshadowed by Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), decided the following term. Holding The Japanese American internment was not unconstitutional because the need to protect against espionage outweighed Korematsus rights. ... Court citation is a standard system used in common law countries such as the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia to uniquely identify the location of past court cases in special series of books called reporters. ... 1944 was a leap year starting on Saturday (link will take you to calendar). ...


External link

  • 320 U.S. 81 (Text of the opinion on Findlaw.com)

  Results from FactBites:
 
HIRABAYASHI v (7980 words)
United States, 312 U.S. The curfew order which appellant violated, and to which the sanction prescribed by the Act of Congress has been deemed to attach, purported to be issued pursuant to an Executive Order of the President.
For reasons presently to be stated, we conclude that it was within the constitutional power of Congress and the executive arm of the Government to prescribe this curfew order for the period under consideration and that its promulgation by the military commander involved no unlawful delegation of legislative power.
We have stated in detail facts and circumstances with respect to the American citizens of Japanese ancestry residing on the Pacific Coast which support the judgment of the war-waging branches of the Government that some restrictive measure was urgent.
  More results at FactBites »


 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.