Langeland contends that certain preliminary requirements must be met under rule 36(b) before the trial court can grant such an amendment and that the trial court abuses its discretion by permitting a party to amend its admissions without first satisfying those requirements.
Langeland defines prejudice as "some harm or injury that the party obtaining admissions has detrimentally suffered in prosecuting the action" and argues that he will be prejudiced by withdrawal of the admissions because "the rule is designed to expedite litigation, and it permits the party securing admissions to rely on their binding effect." Rainbolt v.
Langeland failed to show any detrimental reliance on the admissions or to argue any other facts indicating that prejudice would result to him in maintaining his cause of action if the admissions were amended or withdrawn.
...Ephraim, Wisconsin, 1909 ; Knud Langeland, Nordmoendene i Amerika ; Nogle...in Billed-Magazin, 1:18-19; Langeland, Nordmoendene i Amerika, 16 ff...Nilssen, in Billed-Magazin, 1:71; Langeland, Nordmoendene i Amerika, 10-13...
Michigan State womens basketball coach Karen Langeland, on why she is resigning: "Whats happened over 24 years is that the highs become less high and the lows become lower...
The island is low-lying and agricultural; sugar beets are the main crop.
Feeds |
Contact