FACTOID # 143: If someone you know died from falling out of a tree, you’re probably Brazilian.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Learning styles

A learning style is the method of educating, particular to an individual that is presumed to allow that individual to learn best. It is commonly believed that most people favor some particular method of interacting with, taking in, and processing stimuli or information.[citation needed] Based on this concept, the idea of individualized "learning styles" originated in the 1970s, and has gained popularity in recent years.[citation needed] It has been proposed that teachers should assess the learning styles of their students and adapt their classroom methods to best fit each student's learning style.[citation needed] --76. ... The ASCII codes for the word Wikipedia represented in binary, the numeral system most commonly used for encoding computer information. ...

Contents

Models and theories

Over 80 learning style models have been proposed, each consisting of at least two different styles.


Kolb Learning Style Inventory

This model, developed by Dr. David A. Kolb, is built upon the concept that learning preferences can be described using two continuums: active experimentation-reflective observation and abstract conceptualization-concrete experience. The result is four types of learning styles: David A. Kolb earned his Ph. ...

  • Converging - the decision maker (active experimentation-abstract conceptualization)
  • Accommodating - the do-er (active experimentation-concrete experience)
  • Assimilating - the planner (reflective observation-abstract conceptualization)
  • Diverging - the creator (reflective observation-concrete experience)

The LSI is designed to determine an individual's learning preference through a short series of questions.


Visual, Auditory, and Kinaesthetic

One family of models emphasizes the sensory modalities of informing stimuli. The models in this family may use different terms to describe same or similar learning styles. These models often describe three basic learning styles: To meet Wikipedias quality standards, this article or section may require cleanup. ...

In such models, the term multi-modal describes people who have more than one strong learning preference. Auditory learning is a learning style in which a person learns most effectively by listening to information delivered orally, in lectures, speeches, and oral sessions. ... Kinesthetic learning is a teaching and learning style in which learning takes place by the student actually carrying out a physical activity, rather than listening to a lecture or merely watching a demonstration. ... Visual learning is a teaching method in which ideas, concepts, data and other information are associated with images and represented graphically. ...


Other models

Aiming to explain why aptitude tests, school grades, and classroom performance often fail to identify real ability, Robert J. Sternberg listed various cognitive dimensions in his book Thinking Styles (1997). Several other models are also often used when researching learning styles. This includes the Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), Howard Gardner's Multiple Intelligence Model and the DISC assessment. The Center for Applications of Psychological Type is a non-profit organization co-founded by Isabel Myers in 1975 for MBTI development, research and training. ... It has been suggested that Naturalist Intelligence be merged into this article or section. ... DISC is a group of psychometric tests based on the 1928 work of psychologist William Moulton Marston. ...


Jackson's neuropsychological model of learning in personality argues Sensation Seeking provides a core biological drive of curiousity, learning and exploration. A high drive to explore leads to dysfunctional learning consequences unless cognitions such as goal orientation, deep learning and emotional intelligence re-express it in more complex ways to achieve functional outcomes such as high work performance. Evidence for this model is allegedly impressive (Jackson, 2005; Jackson, in press; Jackson, Hobman, Jimmieson & Martin, in press; O'Connor & Jackson, 2008) but remains unverified by independent research.


Assessment Instruments

Instruments (usually questionnaires) used to identify learning styles include Kolb's Learning Styles Inventory, Fleming's VARK Learning Style Test, Jackson's Learning Styles Profiler (LSP), and the NLP meta programs based iWAM questionnaire. Many other tests have gathered popularity and various levels of credibility among students and teachers. David A. Kolb earned his Ph. ... This article or section does not cite any references or sources. ...


</gallery>==Evidence or lack of evidence?== Learning-styles theories have been criticized by many. Some psychologists and neuroscientists have questioned the scientific basis for these models and the theories on which they are based. Many educational psychologists believe that there is little evidence for the efficacy of most learning style models, and furthermore, that the models often rest on dubious theoretical grounds.[1] According to Stahl,[2] there has been an "utter failure to find that assessing children's learning styles and matching to instructional methods has any effect on their learning." Educational psychology is the study of how humans learn in educational settings, the effectiveness of educational interventions, the psychology of teaching, and the social psychology of schools as organizations. ...


The critique of Coffield, et al.

A non-peer-reviewed literature review by authors from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne identified 71 different theories of learning style.[3] This report, published in 2004, criticized most of the main instruments used to identify an individual's learning style. In conducting the review, Coffield and his colleagues selected 13 of the most influential models for closer study, including most of the models cited on this page. They examined the theoretical origins and terms of each model, and the instrument that was purported to assess types of learning style defined by the model. They analyzed the claims made by the author(s), external studies of these claims, and independent empirical evidence of the relationship between the 'learning style' identified by the instrument and students' actual learning. Coffield's team found that none of the most popular learning style theories had been adequately validated through independent research, leading to the conclusion that the idea of a learning cycle, the consistency of visual, auditory and kinaesthetic preferences and the value of matching teaching and learning styles were all "highly questionable." Newcastle University is a British university located in Newcastle upon Tyne in the north of England. ...


One of the most widely-known theories assessed by Coffield's team was the learning styles model of Dunn and Dunn, a VAK model.[4] This model is widely used in schools in the United States, and 177 articles have been published in peer-reviewed journals referring to this model [3]. The conclusion of Coffield et al. was as follows:

Despite a large and evolving research programme, forceful claims made for impact are questionable because of limitations in many of the supporting studies and the lack of independent research on the model.[3]

In contrast, a 2005 report provided evidence confirming the validity of Dunn and Dunn's model, concluding that "matching students’ learning-style preferences with complementary instruction improved academic achievement and student attitudes toward learning." This meta-analysis, made by one of Rita Dunn's students, does not take account of the previous criticism on the research.[5]

Coffield's critique of Gregorc's Style Delineator

Coffield's team claimed that another model, Gregorc's Style Delineator (GSD), was "theoretically and psychometrically flawed" and "not suitable for the assessment of individuals."


Other critiques of learning styles models

Coffield and colleagues are not alone in their judgement. Demos, a UK think tank, published a report on learning styles prepared by a group chaired by David Hargreaves that included Usha Goswami from Cambridge University and David Wood from the University of Nottingham. The Demos report said that the evidence for learning styles was "highly variable", and that practitioners were "not by any means frank about the evidence for their work." [6] For other uses, see DEMOS (disambiguation). ... David Hargreaves is Associate Director for Development and Research of the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust (SSAT). ... The University of Cambridge (often Cambridge University), located in Cambridge, England, is the second-oldest university in the English-speaking world and has a reputation as one of the most prestigious universities in the world. ... The University of Nottingham is a leading research university in the city of Nottingham, in the East Midlands of England. ...


Cautioning against interpreting neuropsychological research as supporting the applicability of learning style theory, John Geake, Professor of Education at the UK's Oxford Brookes University, and a research collaborator with Oxford University's Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, commented that Oxford Brookes University is a public university in Oxford, England. ... The University of Oxford, located in the city of Oxford in England, is the oldest university in the English-speaking world. ...

We need to take extreme care when moving from the lab to the classroom. We do remember things visually and aurally, but information isn't defined by how it was received.[7]

Writing in the Times Educational Supplement Magazine (27th July 2007), Susan Greenfield said that "from a neuroscientific point of view [the learning styles approach to teaching] is nonsense". Susan Adele Greenfield, Baroness Greenfield, CBE (born 1 October 1951) is a British scientist, writer, broadcaster and member of the House of Lords. ...


See also

Individual differences psychology studies the ways in which individual people differ in their behavior. ... This article is about the educational method. ... Learning is the acquisition and development of memories and behaviors, including skills, knowledge, understanding, values, and wisdom. ... For other uses, see Constructivism. ... Metacognition refers to thinking about cognition (memory, perception, calculation, association, etc. ... Cognitive style is a term used in cognitive psychology to describe the way individuals think, perceive and remember information, or their preferred approach to using such information to solve problems. ... In psychology, the Big Five personality traits are five broad factors or dimensions of personality discovered through empirical research (Goldberg, 1993). ... Many skeptics believe the popularity of horoscopes (and astrology in general) is due to the Forer Effect. ... Educational psychology is the study of how humans learn in educational settings, the effectiveness of educational interventions, the psychology of teaching, and the social psychology of schools as organizations. ...

References

  1. ^ Curry, L. (1990). One critique of the research on learning styles. Educational Leadership, 48, 50-56.
  2. ^ Stahl, S. A. (2002). Different strokes for different folks? In L. Abbeduto (Ed.), Taking sides: Clashing on controversial issues in educational psychology (pp. 98-107). Guilford, CT, USA: McGraw-Hill.
  3. ^ a b c Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
  4. ^ Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1984). Learning style inventory. Lawrence, KS, USA: Price Systems.
  5. ^ Lovelace, MK (2005). Meta-Analysis of Experimental Research Based on the Dunn and Dunn Model. Journal Of Educational Research, 98: 176-183.
  6. ^ Hargreaves, D., et al. (2005). About learning: Report of the Learning Working Group. Demos.
  7. ^ Revell, P. (2005). Each to their own. The Guardian.

Other references


Jackson, C. J. (2005). An applied neuropsychological model of functional and dysfunctional learning: Applications for business, education, training and clinical psychology. Cymeon: Australia
Jackson, C. J. (In press). Measurement issues concerning a personality model spanning temperament, character and experience. In Boyle, G., Matthews, G. & Saklofske, D. Handbook of Personality and Testing. Sage Publishers.
Jackson, C. J., Hobman, E. V., Jimmieson, N. L., Martin, R. (In press). Comparing Different Approach and Avoidance Models of Learning and Personality in the Prediction of Work, University and Leadership Outcomes. British Journal of Psychology.
O’Connor, P. C. & Jackson, C. J. (2008). Learning to be Saints or Sinners: The Indirect Pathway from Sensation Seeking to Behavior through Mastery Orientation. Journal of Personality, 76, 1 - 20.


External links


  Results from FactBites:
 
Learning Styles Online.com - including a free inventory (288 words)
Learning styles are a way to help improve your quality of learning.
Understand what learning styles are and the basis for styles.
Learning styles are useful however they've also been the subject of much hype.
Adapting your learning with learning styles helps you learn faster (1209 words)
Using multiple learning styles and “multiple intelligences” for learning is a relatively new approach.
A result is that we often label those who use these learning styles and techniques as “bright.” Those who use less favored learning styles often find themselves in lower classes, with various not-so-complimentary labels and sometimes lower quality teaching.
If the physical style is more like you, it’s likely that you use your body and sense of touch to learn and understand the world around you.
  More results at FactBites »


 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.