Linguistic competence refers to the knowledge of a language system. The term first emerged in the work of Noam Chomsky, where it referred specifically to syntactic competence, and was specifically opposed to linguistic performance. The term was used more broadly by Dell Hymes in formulating the concept of communicative competence. Like communicative competence, language competence is often divided into various subcompetences, such as syntactic competence and lexical competence. Avram Noam Chomsky (born December 7, 1928) is the Institute Professor Emeritus of linguistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. ... Syntax, originating from the Greek words ÏÏ Î½ (syn, meaning co- or together) and ÏÎ¬Î¾Î¹Ï (táxis, meaning sequence, order, arrangement), can be described as the study of the rules, or patterned relations that govern the way the words in a sentence come together. ... This article needs to be cleaned up to conform to a higher standard of quality. ... Communicative competence is a linguistic term for the ability not only to apply the grammatical rules of a language to form correct utterances, but also to know when to use these utterances appropriately. ...
But contemporary linguistic theory assumes otherwise.One of the cornerstones of contemporary theory is the assumption that to learn a language is to construct a grammar (here understood as including a lexicon--i.e., to construct a linguistic description) of the language.
Linguistic description is the primary concern of linguistic theory, where the central problem might be described as that of determining the characteristics of the ideal linguistic description--its formal and substantive properties.
But if traditional linguistic descriptions do not fit natural linguisticcompetence, neither can they be said to fit the sum of natural plus cultural linguisticcompetence, because there is no reason to imagine that the contribution to linguisticcompetence made by other cultures is necessarily at all similar to that made by the monoculture.
Linguistic theory is concerned primarily with an ideal speaker-hearer, in a completely homogeneous speech community, who knows its language perfectly and is unaffected by such grammatically irrelevant conditions as memory limitations, distractions, shifts of attention and interest, errors (random or characteristic) in applying his knowledge of the language in actual performance (Chomsky, 1965, p.
Hymes` other motive for his development of the theory of communicative competence on the criticism that Chomsky`s linguisticcompetence is a limitation in perspective is his consideration that the acquisition of competence for use can be stated in the same way as the acquisition of competence for grammar.
There is, however, good evidence that competence for use is not part of the same developmental matrix as competence for grammar and that the acquisition of the competence for use cannot be stated in the same terms as acquisition of competence for grammar.