|
The Apology of Socrates by Plato names Meletus as the main perpetrator against Socrates. He is also mentioned in the Euthyphro. The Apology is Platos version of the speech given by Socrates as he defends himself against the charges of being a man who corrupted the young, did not believe in the gods, and created new deities. Such a speech by the defendant was technically known as an apology. It...
Euthyphro is one of Platos known dialogues. ...
Given his lack of skill as an orator and other evidence we have, it is believed Meletus was very young at the time of Socrates's death and probably was not the real leader of the movement against the early philosopher, but rather was simply the spokesman for a group led by Anytus. Anytus can refer to: One of the prosecutors of Socrates One of the Titans in Greek mythology ...
Meletus was probably a poet by trade and likely a religious fanatic who was more concerned with allegations of impiety than with the charges of corruption that were lodged against Socrates. Some believe Meletus was motivated primarily by the reports that Socrates had embarassed the poets (In Plato's Gorgias, Socrates accuses poets and orators of flattery and says that they impress only women, children, and slaves). Gorgias (in Greek ÎοÏγἰαÏ, circa 483-375 BC), Greek sophist, philosopher, and rhetorician, was a native of Leontini in Sicily. ...
In the Euthyphro, Plato describes Meletus, the youngest of the three accusers, as having "a beak, and long straight hair, and a beard which is ill grown." Plato wrote that, prior to the prosecution of Socrates, Meletus was "unknown" to him. Euthyphro is one of Platos known dialogues. ...
During the first three hours of trial, Meletus and the other two accusers each stood in the law court in the center of Athens to deliver previously crafted speeches to the jury against Socrates. No record of Meletus's speech survives. The Acropolis in central Athens, one of the most important landmarks in world history. ...
However, we do have Plato's record of Socrates's cross-examination of Meletus (In these days, the defendant always cross-examined the accuser). Using his trademark Socratic Method, Meletus is made a fool. He says that Socrates corrupts the young, and that Socrates is the only one to do so, but he can not provide a motive for why Socrates would do this, and Socrates shows that if he were to do this it must surely be in ignorance, for no man would intentionally make bad those living around him. Concerning the accusation that Socrates believed in strange spirits and not the gods of the state, Socrates tricks Meletus into saying that spirits are the offspring of gods, and since no one believes in flute playing without flute players, or in horses' offspring without horses, how could Socrates believe in the offspring of gods without believing in gods? For much of his cross examination Meletus remains silent, and we are led to believe that he does not have answers for Socrates. A dialogical method of inquiry, known as the Socratic method or method of elenchos, largely applied to the examination of key moral concepts and first described by Plato in the Socratic Dialogues. ...
Greek historian Diogenes Laertius, writing in the first half of the third century, dubiously reported that after the execution of Socrates "Athenians felt such remorse" that they banished Meletus from their city. Diogenes Laërtius, the biographer of the Greek philosophers, is supposed by some to have received his surname from the town of Laerte in Cilicia, and by others from the Roman family of the Laërtii. ...
| This article is part of WikiProject Philosophy, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. | External Links
A Logical Refutation of Meletus's Charges |