FACTOID # 99: India’s criminal courts acquitted over a million defendants in 1999, more than the next 48 surveyed countries combined.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

Encyclopedia > Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill

The Military Action Against Iraq (Parliamentary Approval) Bill was a private member's bill introduced into the British House of Commons on 26 January 1999 by Tam Dalyell MP under the ten minute rule. The bill sought to transfer the power to authorise military strikes against Iraq from the monarch to Parliament. The long title of the bill was a Bill to require the prior approval, by a simple majority of the House of Commons, of military action by United Kingdom forces against Iraq. It was presented by Tam Dalyell and supported by Tony Benn, Harry Cohen, Jeremy Corbyn, George Galloway, Neil Gerrard, Dr Ian Gibson, John McAllion, Alice Mahon, Robert Marshall-Andrews, Dennis Skinner and Audrey Wise.


The bill had its first reading on 26 January 1999, becoming Bill 35 in the 1998/1999 session, and was initially scheduled for second reading on 16 April 1999. As a bill modifying the monarch's prerogative powers, the Queen was required to consent to it being heard. This is an instance of one situation in which more direct monarchical assent than the rather technical Royal Assent is required for a bill to become an Act of Parliament.


The Queen, acting under the instructions of the government, refused to signify her consent to the bill, so second reading was postponed from 16 April to 23 July 1999. Due to the Crown's refusal to signify its consent to the bill, it was ultimately automatically dropped before it obtained its second reading.


Further reading

External links


  Results from FactBites:
 
18 March 2003 Parliamentary Approval for the invasion of Iraq... - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (219 words)
18 March 2003 Parliamentary Approval for the invasion of Iraq...
Please search for 18 March 2003 Parliamentary Approval for the invasion of Iraq...
Promotional articles about yourself, your friends, your company or products; or articles written as part of a marketing or promotional campaign, may be deleted in accordance with our deletion policies.
Memorandum On The Question Whether Existing Security Council Resolutions Are Sufficient To Authorize The US To Take (14833 words)
It is sometimes argued that, even if the proposed military action cannot be justified on the basis of existing resolutions, it should be regarded as justifiable on the basis that the real purpose of the action is to uphold a UN Security Council resolution.
It is clear that not only would the military action be a violation if it occurs; the US is already in violation of the Charter because of the various statements made by it to the effect that it intends to use military force; these statements are clearly threats.
Section V of this paper explains why the military mandate given by paragraph 2 of Resolution 678 (1990) was terminated by the cease-fire at the close of the Gulf War as a result of paragraph 6 of Resolution 687 (1991).
  More results at FactBites »

 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your location
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.