|
In common law, posse comitatus (Latin, "county force", meaning a sort of local militia) referred to the authority wielded by the county sheriff to conscript any able-bodied male over the age of fifteen to assist him in keeping the peace or to pursue and arrest a felon; compare hue and cry. It is the law enforcement equivalent of summoning the militia for military purposes. This article concerns the common-law legal system, as contrasted with the civil law legal system; for other meanings of the term, within the field of law, see common law (disambiguation). ...
Latin is an ancient Indo-European language originally spoken in Latium, the region immediately surrounding Rome. ...
Lebanese Kataeb militia A Militia is an organization of citizens to provide defense, emergency or paramilitary service, or those engaged in such activity. ...
A county is generally a sub-unit of regional self-government within a sovereign jurisdiction. ...
Look up Sheriff in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. ...
A felony, in many common law legal systems, is the term for a very serious crime; misdemeanors are considered to be less serious. ...
At common law, a hue and cry (Latin, hutesium et clamor) was a process by which bypassers were summoned to assist in the apprehension of a criminal who had been witnessed in the act of committing a felony. ...
For the band, see The Police. ...
Lebanese Kataeb militia A Militia is an organization of citizens to provide defense, emergency or paramilitary service, or those engaged in such activity. ...
English Civil War In 1642, during the early stages of the English Civil War, local forces were everywhere employed by whichever side could, by producing valid written authority, induce them to assemble. The two most common authorities used were, on the side of the Parliament, its own recent "Militia Ordinance"; or that of the king, the old-fashioned "Commissions of Array". But the Royalist leader in Cornwall, Sir Ralph Hopton, indicted the enemy before the grand jury of the county as disturbers of the peace, and had the posse comitatus called out to expel them. Events January 4 - Charles I attempts to arrest five leading members of the Long Parliament, but they escape. ...
The First English Civil War (1642–1646) was the first of three wars, known as the English Civil War (or Wars). The English Civil War refers to the series of armed conflicts and political machinations which took place between Parliamentarians and Royalists from 1642 until 1652, and includes the Second...
The Roundheads was the nickname given to supporters of the Parliamentarian cause in the English Civil War. ...
The Militia Ordinance was a piece of legislation passed by the Long Parliament of England in March 1642, which was a major step towards the civil war between the King and Parliament of England. ...
A commission given by royalty to officers or gentry in a given territory to muster and array the inhabitants, or see them in a condition for war. ...
Prince Rupert of the Rhine Cavaliers was the name used by Parliamentarians for the Royalist supporters of King Charles I during the English Civil War (1642–1651). ...
Cornwall (pronounced ; Cornish: ) is a county in south-west England, United Kingdom, on the peninsula that lies to the west of the River Tamar and Devon. ...
Ralph Hopton (1598-1652) was a Royalist commander in the English Civil War. ...
A grand jury is a type of jury, in the common law legal system, which determines if there is enough evidence for a trial. ...
Modern usage With modern methods of law enforcement, the posse comitatus is generally obsolete. The power presumably continues to exist in those U.S. states that have not repealed it by statute, however. Resort to the posse comitatus figures often in the plots of Western movies, where the body of men recruited is frequently referred to as a posse. Based on this usage, the word posse has come to be used colloquially to refer to various teams, cliques, or gangs. In a number of states, especially in the western United States, sheriffs and other law enforcement agencies have called their civilian auxiliary groups "posses." The Lattimer Massacre of 1897 illustrated the danger of such groups, and thus ended their use in situations of civil unrest. For the band, see The Police. ...
Federal courts Supreme Court Circuit Courts of Appeal District Courts Elections Presidential elections Midterm elections Political Parties Democratic Republican Third parties State & Local government Governors Legislatures (List) State Courts Local Government Other countries Atlas Politics Portal A U.S. state is any one of the fifty subnational entities of the...
The Statute of Grand Duchy of Lithuania A statute is a formal, written law of a country or state, written and enacted by its legislative authority, perhaps to then be ratified by the highest executive in the government, and finally published. ...
Look up plot in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. ...
Broncho Billy Anderson, from The Great Train Robbery The Western movie is one of the classic American film genres. ...
Look up Colloquialism in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. ...
The Lattimer massacre was an incident in which a sheriffs posse killed nineteen unarmed immigrant miners and wounded scores more. ...
1897 (MDCCCXCVII) was a common year starting on Friday (see link for calendar). ...
Civil disorder is a broad term that is typically used by law enforcement to describe one or more forms of disturbance. ...
In the United States, a Federal statute known as the Posse Comitatus Act forbids the use of the military of the United States as a posse comitatus or for law enforcement purposes. The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction. ...
The Military of the United States, also known as the United States Armed Forces, is structured into five branches consisting of the: United States Army United States Marine Corps United States Navy United States Air Force United States Coast Guard Reserves United States National Guard United States Army Reserve United...
The practical disuse of the posse comitatus, and its continued twilight existence as a theoretical legal power, is, like the militia, a subject for the debates about the meaning of the U.S. Constitution Second Amendment. Lebanese Kataeb militia A Militia is an organization of citizens to provide defense, emergency or paramilitary service, or those engaged in such activity. ...
The Bill of Rights in the National Archives Amendment II (the Second Amendment) of the United States Constitution, which is part of the Bill of Rights, declares a well regulated militia as being necessary to the security of a free State, and prohibits Congress from infringement of the right of...
History
History of the Posse Comitatus in English Law (Taken from http://www.llrx.com/features/posse.htm) The term posse comitatus, literally translated as the power of the county, first appeared in English law in 1411 with the passage of a riot act calling for the sheriffs and justice of the peace together with the poair de counte to arrest rioters (13 Hen. 4, c.7 (1411)). However the concept of a posse comitatus can be traced back to the Assize of Arms (1181) and the creation of the jurata ad arma, an armed body of men at the disposal of the King for the purposes of keeping the peace. The role of the jurata ad arma was further cemented with the passage of the Statute of Winchester (13 Edw. 1, stat. 2, c.4 (1285)), a section of which called for the jurata ad arma to respond to the hue and cry for the pursuit of malefactors and peacekeeping. However the separation of the military and the militia from civil law enforcement had been developed earlier in the century with the signing of the Magna Carta (1215, revised 1225). Chapter 39 of the revised version of the Magna Carta (1225) prohibited the imprisonment or punishment of a freeman except by his peers or the law of the land. At common law, a hue and cry (Latin, hutesium et clamor) was a process by which bypassers were summoned to assist in the apprehension of a criminal who had been witnessed in the act of committing a felony. ...
Freeman can mean: Under the medieval feudal system, an individual differentiated from a villein, a serf tied to the land A person who has been awarded Freedom of the City or Freedom of the Company in a Livery Company The Freeman, a publication of the Foundation for Economic Education Freeman...
The apparent conflict between the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta and the establishment of a permanent posse comitatus by statutes in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries continued until the time of the English Revolution in the seventeenth century. By 1623 the statutory basis for the jurata ad arma had been repealed (21 Jac. 1, c.28 (1623)), however King Charles I continued to use martial force to control the country. Parliament's resistance to Charles' claims to the militia provided one of the major factors leading to the Civil War (1642-4. By the end of the seventeenth century and the restoration of the monarchy the role of the posse comitatus had been more clearly defined, it was to work within the confines of the law and would be separate from a militia. The Bill of Rights (1 W. & Mary, sess.2, c.2 (1688)) further confirmed the exclusion of the military from the role of civil law enforcement.
In the eighteenth century the posse comitatus was once again used to control riots, however the 1714 Riot Act (1Geo. 1, stat.2, c.5 (1714)) clearly intended the posse comitatus to be under the control of civil not military authorities, and for those arrested to be subject to the due process of the law of the land and not martial law. William Blackstone in his Commentaries on the Laws of England, made clear that the separation of the military from civil law enforcement was an essential component of the legal system (1 Comm. 400), however he also recognized the need for a posse comitatus for "keeping the peace and pursuing the felons" (1 Comm. 343). William Blackstone as illustrated in his Commentaries on the Laws of England. ...
In 1780 a series of riots in London were eventually suppressed by the use of soldiers. In discussing the legal ramifications of this action Parliament agreed with Lord Chief Justice Mansfield who declared that all civil riots should be put down by civil authorities and the posse comitatus, never by military authorities. Further that even if soldiers comprise the posse comitatus they are deemed to be acting in a civil capacity and are thus subject to civilian laws. This policy of soldier as civilian came to be known as the Mansfield Doctrine and was to be the controlling policy on the role of the posse comitatus in England and throughout its growing colonies.
For more information on the development of the Mansfield Doctrine see David Engdhal, The Legal Background and Aftermath of the Kent State Tragedy, 22 Cleveland State Law Review 3 (1973). Engdahl also provides a very useful description of the evolution of the posse comitatus in English law in Soldiers Riots and Revolution: The Law and History of Military Troops in Civil Disorders, 57 Iowa Law Review 1 (1971). Another useful history of the topic can be found at the beginning of Charles Doyle's The Posse Comitatus Act & Related Matters: The Use of the Military to Execute Civilian Law (2000).
History of the Posse Comitatus in Australian Law The principle was used to great effect in the Colony of New South Wales by Govn. Gidley King in raising a citizen militia to murderously quell the second 'Battle of Vinegar Hill' which commenced at the convict "barracks" at Castle Hill on Sunday night, 4th March 1804. The mainly Irish rebellion started around 8pm and by midnight at Port Jackson (today's City of Sydney) Martial Law was declared across the whole of the colony, as convicts were deemed 'to be in a state of insurrection'. Martial Law continued for seven days, throughout which muskets were heard to fire day and night. The government controlled newspaper reported only 133 convicts were involved, but over six hundred left Castle Hill in the hope of joining with another eleven hundred from the Hawkesbury plains. The population of the colony at the time was around five thousand. Thus the panic that beset the administration and general population. The Rev. Marsden, known amongst many as the flogging parson, put about his old story that all the Irish wanted to do was to rebel and secure ships to sail home in, but what they wanted was a New Ireland, a free and democratic home for all. Nine were hanged, with three left hanging dead in gibbets for many months as a reminder for all. A cartoon of the Irish rebellion some years later The Castle Hill Rebellion of 4 March 1804, also called the Irish Rebellion and the Battle of Vinegar Hill, was Australias only successful large-scale convict rebellion. ...
In modern times, the notion of posse comitatus has been effectively repealed by statutes (such as the Police Powers and Responsibilities Act in Queensland) that comprehensively legislate for the powers available to police officers.
The History of the Posse Comitatus in American Law The American experience with the posse comitatus began in the colonial period with the repeated use of military troops to suppress disorders in the colonies. The violation of the due process principles outlined in colonial charters was most apparent in the Boston massacre of 1770 when rioters were fired upon by the army. The army had been sent to Boston to act as a police force, the responsibility of civil authorities, rather than as a security force. Following the Revolution the founding fathers incorporated strong due process principles into the Constitution, however they also allowed for the use of the militia to execute the laws of the Union (U.S. Const. Art I, s.8, cl.15, 16). David Engdahl provides an excellent summary of the debates over the use of the military and the militia during the Constitutional Convention in Soldiers Riots and Revolution: The Law and History of Military Troops in Civil Disorders, 57 Iowa Law Review 1 (1971).
During the first 70 years of the new country the principles of due process and an adoption of the Mansfield Doctrine prevailed. While militiamen and soldiers were occasionally called to supplement the civilian peace keeping forces they were viewed strictly as a civilian posse and thus held liable under ordinary law. The turning point for this application of the Mansfield Doctrine occurred shortly before the Civil War. A federal marshal, in carrying out provisions of the Fugitive Slave Act 1850, sought reimbursement from the government for funds he had paid a posse comitatus comprised of police and militiamen. In responding to the claim the then U.S. Attorney General, Caleb Cushing, overruled the Mansfield Doctrine and declared that a posse comitatus could consist of soldiers acting in their military capacity (6 Op. Att'y Gen. 466, 473 (1854)). This overhaul of government policy toward a posse comitatus was to continue throughout the Civil War period when the military was used on numerous occasions for apparently civilian peace keeping duty.
The Posse Comitatus Act -
The Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 was a direct response to the increasing use of the military for civilian purposes in the Reconstruction period following the Civil War. On many occasions troops had been used to quell civil disturbances, to help form governments in the southern states, and to enforce civil laws. This issue came to a head when Rutherford B Hayes won the disputed presidential election of 1876. Accusations were quickly made that troops sent to the southern states to act as a posse comitatus for federal marshals at the polls assisted in providing the President with the essential votes. In 1878 a Democrat controlled House of Representatives passed an army appropriations bill (20 Stat 145, 152) which contained language expressly prohibiting the use of the army as a posse comitatus. The act therefore rejected the Mansfield Doctrine that troops could be used in a civilian capacity as long as they were subject to civilian law, and equated the use of troops with martial law. The Posse Comitatus Act is a United States federal law (18 U.S.C. § 1385) passed on June 16, 1878 after the end of Reconstruction. ...
The text of the act has essentially remained unaltered except for the addition of the Air Force in 1956 (70A Stat 626 (1956), however Congress has created expansions to the number of statutory exceptions to the act (e.g., 10 USC 331, 10 USC 332 and 10 USC 371-82).
The Application of the Posse Comitatus Act The language of the Act calls for two instances when the Act does not apply; when an exception is expressly authorized by the Constitution, and when Congress expressly authorizes an exception. The first of these provisions has created much confusion in the application of the Act since the Constitution contains no provision expressly authorizing the use of the military to enforce the law. Much of the literature discussing the constitutional exceptions of the Act therefore focuses upon the conflict between the implied and inherent constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.
The second provision allowing for exceptions to the Act, Congressional authorization, has been applied in two ways; by providing a branch of the armed services with civilian law enforcement capabilities, and by establishing rules for specific types of assistance, thereby tailoring specific statutory exceptions to fit particular circumstances. In the first instance Congress has expressly authorized the Coast Guard to carry out law enforcement duties during peacetime, most notably enforcement of anti-drug laws (14 USC 2). In times of war authority for the Coast Guard transfers from the Department of Homeland Security to the Navy, however under the statutory exceptions created by Congress the Coast Guard can still fulfill its law enforcement duties. It should be noted that the Navy and Marine Corps have been brought under the Posse Comitatus Act by DoD Directive 5525.5 (1986, as amended 1989) and by Secretary of the Navy Instruction (SECNAVINST) 5820.7B (1988).
Second, Congress has enacted numerous pieces of legislation permitting the use of military assistance and equipment in aiding civilian law enforcement (see in particular 10 USC 371-82). Most of this legislation originated in 1981 following the "Wounded Knee" cases. These cases stemmed from the 1973 take-over of a facility on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota, and the subsequent siege, arrest and trial of members of the American Indian Movement (AIM). During the course of the siege the federal civilian law enforcement authorities made extensive use of material, personnel and equipment provided by the military. The assistance provided by the military ultimately led to the undermining of the charges against those arrested, and it became clear that Congress needed to address the need for statutory exclusions to the original Act. In addition to statutory exceptions concerning providing civil law enforcement with assistance, Congress has also enacted legislation providing for exceptions during times of civil disturbance (10 USC 331, 10 USC 332). The regulations promulgated under these statutes provide for the protection of federal property and government functions, and authorizes the use of the military in states of emergency when civil authorities are unable to control the situation (32 CFR 215.1-.10). Additional legislation has been enacted covering instances when nuclear material is involved in an emergency (18 USC 831(e)).
However, no conviction of a violation of 18 USC 1385 has ever been carried out. There are demands for amendments to or repealing of the Act.
References Washington University Argument of Posse Comitatus Act of 1878
See also Commandeering is an act of appropriation by the military or police whereby they take possession of the property of a member of the public. ...
Links |
Feeds |
Contact