|
In historical scholarship, a primary source is a document, or other source of information that was created at or near the time being studied, by an authoritative source, usually one with direct personal knowledge of the events being described. In this sense primary does not mean superior. It refers to creation by the primary players, and is distinguished from a secondary source, which in historical scholarship is a work, such as a scholarly book or article, built up from primary sources.[1] [<br /> ---- Julius Caesar was born in the year 100 BC] Historiography is a term with multiple meanings that has changed with time, place and observer, and is thus resistant to a single encompassing meaning. ...
For the similarly-named Surrealist journal, see Documents (journal). ...
In historical scholarship, a Secondary source is a work of history written as a synthetic account, usually based on primary sources and other secondary sources. ...
Types of primary sources The nature of a primary source depends on the historical problem being studied. In political history, the most important primary sources are likely to be documents such as official reports, speeches, pamphlets, posters, or letters by participants, official election returns, and eyewitness accounts (as by a journalist who was there). In the history of ideas or intellectual history, the dominant primary sources are books, essays and letters written by intellectuals. A study of cultural history could include fictional sources such as novels or plays. In a broader sense primary sources also include physical objects like photographs, newsreels, coins, paintings or buildings created at the time. Historians may also take archaeological artifacts and oral reports and interviews into consideration. Written sources may be divided into three main types.[2] Political history is what most people refer to simply as history. ...
The history of ideas is a field of research in history that deals with the expression, preservation, and change of human ideas over time. ...
Intellectual history means either: the history of intellectuals, or: the history of the people who create, discuss, write about and in other ways propagate ideas. ...
Cultural history (from the German term Kulturgeschichte), at least in its common definition since the 1970s, often combines the approaches of anthropology and history to look at popular cultural traditions and cultural interpretations of historical experience. ...
I archaeology, an artifact or artefact is any object made or modified by a human culture, and often one later recovered by some archaeological endeavor. ...
- Narrative sources or literary sources tell a story or message. They are not limited to fictional sources (which can be sources of information for contemporary attitudes), but include diaries, films, biographies, scientific works, and so on.
- Diplomatic sources include charters and other legal documents which usually follow a set format.
- Social documents are records created by organizations, such as registers of births, tax records, and so on.
In the study of historiography, when the study of history is itself subject to historical scrutiny, a secondary source becomes a primary source. For a biography of a historian, that historian's publications would be primary sources. Documentary films can be considered a secondary source or primary source, depending on how much the filmmaker modifies the original sources.[3] To meet Wikipedias quality standards, this article or section may require cleanup. ...
It has been suggested that this article be split into multiple articles accessible from a disambiguation page. ...
[<br /> ---- Julius Caesar was born in the year 100 BC] Historiography is a term with multiple meanings that has changed with time, place and observer, and is thus resistant to a single encompassing meaning. ...
Strengths and weaknesses of primary sources A primary source is not necessarily more authoritative or accurate than a secondary source. "Original material may be ... prejudiced, or at least not exactly what it claims to be."[4] Secondary sources are often subjected to peer review, can be well documented, and are often written by historians working in institutions where methodological accuracy is important to the future of the author's career and reputation. Peer review (known as refereeing in some academic fields) is a scholarly process used in the publication of manuscripts and in the awarding of funding for research. ...
Historians consider the accuracy and objectiveness of the primary sources they are using and historians subject both primary and secondary sources to a high level of scrutiny. A primary source such as a journal entry, at best, only reflects one person's take on events, which may or may not be truthful, accurate, or complete. Participants and eyewitnesses may misunderstand events or distort their reports (deliberately or unconsciously) to enhance their own image or importance. Such effects can increase over time, as people create a narrative that may not be accurate. [5] For any source, primary or secondary, it is important for the researcher to evaluate the amount and direction of bias.[6] For example, a government report may be an accurate and unbiased description of events, but it can be censored or altered for propaganda or coverup purposes. Every barrister knows evidence in a court case may be truthful, but it may be distorted to support (or oppose) the position of one of the parties.
Forgeries Medieval historians must contend with forged documents created to create legal rights. For centuries the Pope used the forged Donation of Constantine to bolster the Papacy. The investigation of documents to determine their authenticity is diplomatics. Among the earliest forgeries are Anglo-Saxon Charters. There are a number of 11th and 12th century forgeries produced by monastries and abbeys to support a claim to land where the original document had been lost (or never existed). One particularly unusual forgery of a primary source was perpetrated by Sir Edward Deering who placed false monumental brasses in a local church. [7] In 1986, Hugh Trevor-Roper "authenticated" the Hitler diaries which proved to be forgeries. Recently, forged documents have been placed within the UK National Archives in the hope of establishing a false provenance. [8] However, historians dealing with recent centuries rarely encounter forgeries of any importance. A 13th C. fresco of Sylvester and Constantine, showing the purported Donation. ...
Diplomatics is forensic palaeography. ...
Anglo-Saxon Charters are documents from the early medieval period in Britain which typically make a grant of land or record a privilege. ...
Monastery of St. ...
Wikipedia does not yet have an article with this exact name. ...
Monumental brass is a species of engraved sepulchral memorial which in the early part of the 13th century began to partially take the place of three-dimensional monuments and effigies carved in stone or wood. ...
Hugh Redwald Trevor-Roper, Baron Dacre of Glanton (January 15, 1914 â January 26, 2003) was a notable historian of early modern Britain and Nazi Germany. ...
Hitlers Diaries Discovered (Stern) In April 1983, the German news magazine Stern published extracts from what purported to be the diaries of Adolf Hitler, known as the Hitler Diaries, which were subsequently exposed as forgeries. ...
The National Archives building at Kew. ...
Provenance is the origin or source from which anything comes. ...
See also [<br /> ---- Julius Caesar was born in the year 100 BC] Historiography is a term with multiple meanings that has changed with time, place and observer, and is thus resistant to a single encompassing meaning. ...
A source text is text (usually written but sometimes oral) from which information or ideas are derived. ...
In historical scholarship, a Secondary source is a work of history written as a synthetic account, usually based on primary sources and other secondary sources. ...
Where a primary source presents material from a first-hand witness to a phenomenon, and a secondary source provides commentary, analysis and criticism of primary sources, a tertiary source is a selection and compilation of primary and secondary sources. ...
Original research is research that is not exclusively based on a summary, review or synthesis of earlier publications on the subject of research. ...
Notes - ^ Handlin (1954) 118-246
- ^ Martha Howell and Walter Prevenier, From Reliable Sources, pp. 20-22.
- ^ Cripps (1995)
- ^ David Iredale, Enjoying Archives
- ^ Sommer and Quinlan (2002)
- ^ Library of Congress (2007)
- ^ A Camp, Everyone has Roots
- ^ http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/news/stories/104.htm
References - Jules R. Benjamin. A Student's Guide to History (2003)
- Kathleen W. Craver. Using Internet Primary Sources to Teach Critical Thinking Skills in History (1999)
- Thomas Cripps, "Historical Truth: An Interview with Ken Burns", American Historical Review 100 (1995), 741-64. online at JSTOR
- Michael Drake and Ruth Finnegan (Eds), Sources and Methods for Family and Community Historians: A Handbook, (Cambridge University Press in conjunction with the Open University, 1997)
- Wood Gray, Historian's handbook, a key to the study and writing of history (Houghton Mifflin, 1964).
- Oscar Handlin et al., Harvard Guide to American History (1954)
- Martha C. Howell and Walter Prevenier. From Reliable Sources: An Introduction to Historical Methods (2001)
- Library of Congress, " Analysis of Primary Sources" online 2007
- Richard A. Marius and Melvin E. Page. A Short Guide to Writing About History (5th Edition) (2004)
- Barbara W. Sommer and Mary Kay Quinlan, The Oral History Manual (2002)
External links - - to primary sources repositories
- - to all sources repositories
- - to essays and descriptions of primary, secondary and other sources
|