FACTOID # 88: Venezuela is one of the happiest and most murderous places in the world.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RELATED ARTICLES
People who viewed "ProPolice" also viewed:
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > ProPolice

The Stack-Smashing Protector (sometimes called SSP, formerly known as ProPolice) is an extension to the GNU Compiler Collection that helps mitigate the damage that can be done by buffer overflow-based attacks. In particular, it provides stack-smashing protection.


The Stack-Smashing Protector was originally written, and is still maintained, by Hiroaki Etoh of IBM.


So far it remains a patch external to GCC, and must be added to GCC by developers wishing to employ stack-smashing protection in their programs. At this time, only a small number of operating system developers utilize the Stack-Smashing Protector in their projects by default: OpenBSD and DragonFly BSD. Gentoo Linux also has a version of their software distribution (Hardened Gentoo) that contains the Stack-Smashing Protector patch, but as Gentoo is primarily a source-based meta-distribution, this cannot be considered "out of the box" support.


See also

External link


  Results from FactBites:
 
Stack-smashing protection - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (1771 words)
Typically, stack-smashing protection modifies the organization of data in the stack frame of a function call to include a "canary" value which, when destroyed, shows that a buffer preceding it in memory has been overflowed.
Under OpenBSD, ProPolice is enabled by default, and the -fno-stack-protector flag disables it.
Stack-smashing protection is a change to the compiler; and as such, it is possible for the protection to alter the structure of the data on the stack frame.
blackant.net: other: docs: benchmarks: propolice on openbsd (699 words)
OpenBSD 3.1-release, 3.2-release, 3.3-current (20030508 snapshot), and 3.3-current (same snapshot) with a propolice enabled kernel (from 20030513 cvs) were installed on two machines: an Athlon XP and a Pentium 166.
The overall difference between 3.2 and 3.3 (sans propolice kernel) is 4.7% on the athlon and 9.3% on the pentium.
The overall difference between current with and without propolice kernels is 2% on the athlon and 0.7% on the pentium.
  More results at FactBites »


 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.