|
United Kingdom There is currently no ad valorem tax on residential property. Two former systems were dropped because of their extreme unpopularity. They were - Schedule A income tax, a central government tax that was levied on the imputed rent, that is the rent that owner-occupiers of land would have been receiving from a tenant had they not been living in the houses they owned. However, actual (as opposed to imputed) rent is still subject to income tax under Schedule A;
- Rates, a local government tax that was levied in proportion to the assessed value of property. This was replaced under the Thatcher government by a poll tax, which proved even more unpopular than the rates, and was replaced by a mixed council tax which combines elements of property tax and a poll tax. The poll tax debacle was one of the factors that led eventually to Margaret Thatcher losing the office of Prime Minister. Rates are still (2003) levied on business property, though some classes of business are exempt.
United States In the United States, property tax on real estate is usually assessed by local government, at the municipal or county level. Tax assessor offices are responsible for plotting and mapping land ownership for collection purposes. This is accomplished with the help of surveyors.
Rising real estate property taxes were a cause of taxpayer revolt in the west; see California Proposition 13 (1978) and Oregon Ballot Measure 5 (1990) for more details.
In the US, another form of property tax is the personal property tax, which can target
Personal property tax can be assessed at almost any level of government, though they are perhaps most commonly assessed by states.
Real estate taxes in many locations in the United States are used to fund school systems. Thus, poor areas perforce have disadvantaged school systems. The system of real estate taxes has been sharply criticized as being archaic for this and other reasons. Nevertheless, public opinion has to a large extent prevented any significant change in the system.
Impacts
Ecological Property tax on real estate has been implicated as a factor contributing to urban sprawl. The foundation of this argument is that the market value of undeveloped real estate reflects the property's current use as well as it's development potential. As a city expands, the development potential of outlying property increases thus increasing the property value and tax. Property uses which generate little or no revenue per land area (such as farms, ranches, private conservation parks, etc) become disadvantaged relative to property uses which generate a high revenue per land area (such as retail and industrial).
The effects which property tax has on urban development are ambiguous regarding urban sprawl. A property owner who improves her land must pay tax on the improvements. This tax on improvements has been shown to result in lower density development. As the density of development decreases, the amount of developed land needed for a given population increases. However, this pressure may be counteracted because a property tax tends to decrease dwelling-size of new developments.
Attempts to reduce the ecological impact of property taxes include:
- Current-use valuation - this method assesses the value of a given property based only upon it's current use. By removing the development potential as a factor in the property taxes, the effect of city encroachment is removed.
- Conservation easments - the property owner adds a restriction to the property prohibiting future development. This effectively removes the development potential as a factor in the property taxes.
- Exemptions - exempting favored classes of real estate (such as farms, ranches, cemeteries or private conservation parks) from the property tax altogether.
Because the first two methods retain some amount of property tax, those remedies still favor land uses which generate revenue although the effect is smaller.
Sociological Property tax is a regressive tax which particularly affects low-income/high-asset persons (pensioners, farmers in drought years, etc). Because these persons have high-assets accumulated over time, they have a high property tax liability. However, their current income level is low. Therefore, a larger proportion of their income goes to paying the property tax.
The regressive nature of the tax was a common argument used by supporters of California Proposition 13
See Also - Land Value Tax
- Urban Sprawl and the Property Tax (http://kipfweb.kipf.re.kr/lis/livedb/sinmungo/file/sprawltax.pdf)
- Neutral Property Taxation (http://fmwww.bc.edu/ec-p/wp411.pdf)
- The Property Tax as a Tax on Value: Deadweight Loss (http://fmwww.bc.edu/ec-p/wp532.pdf)
- The Local Property Tax Literature: 100 Years of Disagreement (http://www.infra.kth.se/BYFA/Publikationer/Arbetsrapporter_pdf/4Rapport4.pdf)
| 
Feeds |
Contact
