|
No. 01-1774 (917 words) |
 | Schmidt argues that the alleged conduct with his granddaughters was inadmissible other acts evidence, trial counsel was ineffective for not seeking a limiting instruction, and postconviction and appellate counsel erred by not challenging the admission of this evidence. |
| Schmidt argues that certain of the prosecutor's remarks in her opening statement invited the jury to anticipate evidence of other uncharged acts and suggested that Schmidt had victimized his granddaughters. |
| Schmidt complains that the circuit court had deferred ruling on the admissibility of this evidence, and it was improper for the prosecutor to discuss it prior to a ruling. |
Feeds |
Contact