Savo (Savonia/Savolax) is the name of a geographical region in Finland which can refer to: Savonia, Savolax or Savo, is a historical province in the south of Finland. ...
It is also an island near Guadalcanal in the Solomon Islands. Savonia, Savolax or Savo, is a historical province in the south of Finland. ... The historical provinces (Finnish: maakunnat or provinssit – singular maakunta or provinssi, Swedish: landskap) of Finland is a legacy of the countrys joint history with Sweden. ... The provinces or landskap were the subdivisions of Sweden until 1634, when they were replaced by the counties of Sweden (län). ... Northern Savonia is a region (maakunta / landskap) in eastern Finland. ... Finland is divided into 20 regions (maakunta/landskap in Finnish/Swedish). ... Southern Savonia is a region (maakunta / landskap) in the south-east of Finland. ... The Province of Eastern Finland is a province of Finland. ... Finland consists of 6 provinces (Finnish: läänit, Swedish: län). ... Map showing the parts Karelia is traditionally divided into. ... The Savo dialect of Finnish is the largest dialect of the Finnish language. ... Guadalcanal, position (inset) and main towns Guadalcanal is a 2,510 square mile (6 500 km²) island in the Pacific Ocean and a province of the Solomon Islands. ...
This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article.
Savo alleged that Wells had been ineffective in his pre-trial investigation of the case, in his failure to object to various portions of the governments evidence, and in his cross-examination of key government witnesses (in particular, S.W.).
Savo argued that, from the defense viewpoint, it was crucial to show that S.W. knew that she would be alone with Savo because this would rebut any prosecution claim that S.W. would never have agreed to go to the house unless she thought that other people would be present to protect her from Savo.
Savo asserted that Wells was incompetent for failing to argue that S.W. invented her story of sexual assault for the purpose of winning the sympathy of family and friends, so that S.W.s mother would allow her to come home again, or so that some other family member or friend would open their door to S.W..
Savos argument that the State is procedurally barred from challenging Judge Torrisis ruling On December 26, 2002, Judge Torrisi initially issued a Memorandum in which he rejected certain of Savos claims of ineffective assistance of counsel but declined to rule on others.
Savo argued that, from the defense viewpoint, it was crucial to show that S.W. knew that she would be alone with Savo because this would rebut any prosecution claim that S.W. would never have agreed to go to the house unless she thought that other people would be present to protect her from Savo.
Savo asserted that Wells was incompetent for failing to argue that S.W. invented her story of sexual assault for the purpose of winning the sympathy of family and friends, so that S.W.s mother would allow her to come home again, or so that some other family member or friend would open their door to S.W..
Feeds |
Contact