FACTOID # 13: The United States spends more money on its military than the next 12 nations combined.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

FACTS & STATISTICS    Simple view

  1. Select countries to view: (hold down Control key and click to select several)

     

     

    Compare:

     

     

  1. Select fact or statistic: (* = graphable)

     

     

     

  2. (OPTIONAL) Compare to statistic: (both need to be graphable)

     

     

     

  3. View result as:

     

       
(OR) SEARCH ALL encyclopedia, stats & forums:   

Encyclopedia > Sea of Japan naming dispute
The neutrality of this article is disputed.
Please see the discussion on the talk page.
The dispute concerns the international name of this body of water
The dispute concerns the international name of this body of water

There is a dispute over using the name "Sea of Japan" to refer to the sea bordered by Russia, Japan, North Korea, and South Korea. Although Sea of Japan, or equivalent translations, are commonly used in international productions, North and South Korea insist on different names. Image File history File links Unbalanced_scales. ... Image File history File links Map of the disputed water, created for Dispute over the name of the Sea of Japan. ... Image File history File links Map of the disputed water, created for Dispute over the name of the Sea of Japan. ... The Sea of Japan (East Sea) is a marginal sea of the western Pacific Ocean. ...


North Korea proposes the "East Sea of Korea"[1] and South Korea proposes the "East Sea",[2] or the "Sea of Korea/Korean Sea" [3] respectively, instead of or as names concurrent with "Sea of Japan".

Contents

Arguments

South Korean groups advocate "East Sea" should be restored as a historically and geographically appropriate name, since the sea was known as "Sea of Korea/Corea/Joseon" or "East/Oriental Sea" until Japan's militant expansionism.[4] They insist the title "Sea of Japan" was unfairly standardized during Japanese rule of Korea, and thus remains a symbol of Japan's imperialistic past. Korea argues that during the critical period for asserting the name East Sea in the international arena, Korea was deprived of its sovereignty, and had no diplomatic representation on the global stage.[3] Koreans were even denied the use of their native language (1938~), and forced to adopt Japanese names (1940~), while time-honored Korean geographical names including the East Sea (Donghae - 동해/東海) were changed to Japanese ones.[3] Korea's position is that while "Sea of Korea" is actually the more common historical European name, "East Sea," without reference to a specific country, is more neutral[citation needed]. Korea under Japanese rule was the period of Japans de facto administrative control of Korea from 1910 to 1945. ... Anthem: Kimi Ga Yo Imperial Reign Slogan: Fukoku Kyohei Enrich the Country, Strengthen the Military Imperial Japan at its fullest extent during World War II Capital Tokyo Government Constitutional monarchy Emperor  - 1852-1912 Emperor Meiji  - 1912-1926 Emperor Taishō  - 1926-1989 Emperor Shōwa Prime Minister (many other Prime Ministers...


Since the 1990s, South Korea has been making efforts to change the official international name referring to the sea. The North Korean government supports South Korea's position,[5] but uses "East Sea of Korea" in its English publications instead."[1][6]


Japan insists that the name "Sea of Japan" had internationally established itself as a single name by the early 19th century during a period in which Japan was under the isolation policy (Sakoku).[7][8] Accordingly, they state, Japan could at that time have had no influence on the international community in regards to the naming of the sea. Therefore, the claim by the Koreas that the name is a "remnant of colonialism" in the early 20th century is completely groundless, and it is not acceptable for Korea to try to change the name based on the incorrect recognition.[9] The Sea of Japan (East Sea) is a marginal sea of the western Pacific Ocean. ... The following text needs to be harmonized with text in the article History of Japan#Seclusion. ...


Both sides in the dispute have put forward a number of arguments to support their claim. Some of these arguments are not supported by the respective governments, but rather by nationalist organizations[citation needed]. Around 2002, the volunteer Korean online organization VANK began an aggressive e-mail campaign aimed at webmasters, with some success but also backlash from supporters of Japan's position.[10] VANK or Voluntary Agency Network of Korea is a non-governmental South Korean organization made up of volunteers. ...


Geographical reasons

Japan argues that because the marginal sea is separated by the Japanese Archipelago from the Pacific Ocean, the sea was named Sea of Japan.[11] Of the nine other marginal seas, two are named for the marginal feature[citation needed]. Korea argues that the adjective “East” describes its geographical position east of the Asian continent (although it is west of Japan), analogous to the North Sea of the European continent (although it is south of many European countries). A marginal sea is a part of ocean partially enclosed by land such as islands, archipelagos, or peninsulas. ... The Japanese Archipelago which forms the country of Japan extends from north to south along the eastern coast of the Eurasian Continent, the western shore of the Pacific Ocean. ... The North Sea is a sea of the Atlantic Ocean, located between the coasts of Norway and Denmark in the east, the coast of the British Isles in the west, and the German, Dutch, Belgian and French coasts in the south. ...


Historical reasons

South Korea and Japan use selective samples of old European maps to support their claim. South Korea point to maps that show "Sea of Korea" or "East Sea", whereas the Japan point to maps that show "Sea of Japan" to argue that the name was in use before the rise of Japanese imperialism. Many old maps are ambiguous and some even do not include Korea or Japan.[7][8]


Japan claims that the term "Sea of Japan" was originally named by Westerners and became the de facto standard before Japan gained commercial and political influence over other nations.[11] Part of the dispute boils down to the disagreement over when "Sea of Japan" became the de facto standard[citation needed]. Japan claims dates in the early 19th century,[7][8] whereas Korea claim dates in the early 20th century when Korea was colonized by Japan.[3]


South Korea pointed out that a few 19th-century Japanese maps even referred to the sea as the "Sea of Joseon (Korea)",[12] including the 1855 Matsuda Ryokuzan's (松田緑山) Chikyubankoku zenzu (地球万國全図), and the 1870 Meiji kaitei bankoku yochibunzu (明治改訂万國輿地分図). [13] Additionally, in several Japanese maps, the Pacific Ocean was called Dainihon kai "大日本海" (the Great Sea of Japan), and the Korean Peninsula side of the Sea of Japan was called Chōsen-kai "朝鮮海" (Sea of Korea).[14]


Ownership

Some supporters of the Korean position, such as the VANK (Voluntary Agency Network of Korea), argue that "Sea of Japan" implies ownership over an international body of water[citation needed]. Japanese[name a specific person/group] counter by saying that the name of a body of water does not imply ownership and is merely a name, mentioning some seas that contains a country's name such as Indian Ocean, South China Sea, East China Sea and Korea Strait. Some Koreans[name a specific person/group] argue that the name "Sea of Japan" is related to ownership because it was the Japanese delegates who submitted the name to the IHB when Korea was under Japanese colonial rule[citation needed]. Supporters of the Japanese position[name a specific person/group] also point out that the Russian name for the sea also means "Sea of Japan" and is not controversial in that country. The South China Sea, showing surrounding countries and neighbouring seas and oceans The South China Sea is a marginal sea south of China. ... The East China Sea is a marginal sea and part of the Pacific Ocean. ... The Korea Strait is a sea passage between South Korea and Japan, connecting the East China Sea and the Sea of Japan (East Sea) in northwest Pacific Ocean. ...


The term "East Sea", on the other hand, implies the sea is along the east coast of Korea and China, ignoring that it is west of Japan and south of Russia.


Ambiguity

Japanese groups claim that the name "East Sea" is not suitable as an international geographic name, because it could refer to various places including the neighbouring East China Sea,[15] and used as compound words such as the East Sea Fleet and the East Sea Bridge. Much of this argument is based on translations of local names into English. Commonly cited potential confusions are the Vietnamese local language name for the South China Sea, "Bien Dong", which is frequently translated as "East Sea",[16] or the Baltic Sea which in many European languages is called the equivalent of "East Sea".[17][18] The Koreans state that this is irrelevant as there are other geographical places that share similar or the same name[citation needed]. East Sea is: Sea of Japan - South Koreas local name for Sea of Japan. ... The East China Sea is a marginal sea and part of the Pacific Ocean. ... The East Sea Fleet was the first naval force formed by the Peoples Republic of China, on 23 April 1949, and was initially based at Shanghai. ... Donghai Bridge (Simplified Chinese: ; Traditional Chinese: ; pinyin: Dōnghǎi Dàqiáo; literally East Sea Grand Bridge) is the longest cross-sea bridge in the world. ... The South China Sea, showing surrounding countries and neighbouring seas and oceans The South China Sea is a marginal sea south of China. ... The Baltic Sea is located in Northern Europe, from 53°N to 66°N latitude and from 20°E to 26°E longitude. ...


On the other hand, some Japanese argue that "East Sea" is a mere translation of the Korean local name Donghae, and thus it is not really an English name per se[citation needed]. However, Korea's argument for "East Sea" stems from the term's use in European maps, not as a translation of the local name[citation needed].


Precedence

Some Japanese groups[name a specific person/group] insist that renaming or showing both simultaneously runs counter to the spirit of geographic standardization and will be a troubling precedent[citation needed]. Since the name "Sea of Japan" is the internationally established name, some people[name a specific person/group] think that renaming is an unnecessary complication[citation needed]. Koreans[name a specific person/group] disagree stating that setting the name right is more important[citation needed].


Historical developments of the dispute

  • In 1928, Limits of Oceans and Seas, the first edition of the guideline by the IHB, adopted the "Japan Sea", among many other geographical names. At the time, Korea could not participate because it was under Japanese occupation. Therefore, South Korea insists that the "Sea of Japan" has been used almost exclusively on international maps, although the parties disagree on when and which name was previously prevalent.
  • In 1957, South Korea joined IHO.[citation needed]
  • Since the early 1970's, South Koreans have argued against the "Sea of Japan" name.[19]
  • In 1974, IHO released technical resolution A.4.2.6 independently of this dispute. This resolution is frequently referred to, although it only gives general guidance. It endorses the principle that when the sharing countries of a geographical feature do not agree on a common name, the different names should be recognized simultaneously.
  • In 1977, the third UN Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names (UNCSGN) adopted resolution III/20 entitled "Names of Features beyond a Single Sovereignty". The resolution recommended:

"when countries sharing a given geographical feature do not agree on a common name, it should be a general rule of cartography that the name used by each of the countries concerned will be accepted. A policy of accepting only one or some of such names while excluding the rest would be inconsistent as well as inexpedient in practice." Korea under Japanese rule was the period of Japans de facto administrative control of Korea from 1910 to 1945. ... The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) is an intergovernmental international organization established in 1921. ...

  • In 1986, Draft for the fourth edition of the guideline of IHO, Limits of Oceans and Seas (S-23), was completed and the "Sea of Japan" appeared as a sole appellation. South Korea did not raise an objection against the name "Sea of Japan."
  • In 1992, South Korea raised the issue at the sixth UNCSGN. Japan objected and the issue was not addressed.
  • In 1995, South Korea deleted "Japan Sea" from its official nautical charts. Before then, South Korea's nautical charts showed both "Japan Sea" and "Tong Hae" (the then used romanization of "Donghae"), out of respect for international conventions.
  • In 1997, South Korea raised the issue again at the seventh UNCSGN and Japan opposed. The issue was not addressed but the resolution III/20 was recollected, which urges Japan and South Korea to reach a consensus. To date, however, neither country is willing to compromise their position, although Korea suggests that both names be used until the dispute is resolved.
  • In 2002, South Korea raised the issue again at the eighth UNCSGN. Japan objected again and the issue was not addressed.
  • In 2002, the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) distributed a circular letter asking for a vote for omitting pages containing the Sea of Japan from the fourth edition of Limits of Oceans and Seas. After Japan's objection, the IHO withdrew the letter.
  • On April 23, 2004, the United Nations affirmed in a written document to the Japanese government that it will continue using the name "Sea of Japan" in its official documents. However, it has agreed to leave the topic open for further discussion. In a letter to South Korea, it was explained that the UN was not determining the validity of either name, but using the currently most widely used term until the parties resolved the disagreement.
  • In November, 2006, South Korean President Roh Moo-hyun demanded to Prime Minister of JapanShinzo Abe changing the name of the Sea of Japan into "Sea of peace". [23][24]

The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) is an intergovernmental international organization established in 1921. ... April 23 is the 113th day of the year in the Gregorian Calendar (114th in leap years). ... 2004 (MMIV) was a leap year starting on Thursday of the Gregorian calendar. ... The United Nations (UN) is an international organization whose stated aims are to facilitate co-operation in international law, international security, economic development, and social equity. ... The National Assembly is the South Korean parliament. ... Roh Moo-hyun (born September 1, 1946 in Gimhae, South Gyeongsang) (IPA: ) has been the President of South Korea since February 25, 2003. ... {{nihongo|Shinzo Abe|安倍 晋三|Abe Shinzō|extra=pronounced [abe ɕinzoː], born (September 21, 1954 – April 15, 2007) is the current Prime Minister of Japan, elected by a special session of the National Diet on September 26, 2006. ...

Current stance of the international organizations

The United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names (UNCSGN) and the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) have so far neither accepted nor denied Korea's claims, but left the issue open to discussion while continuing to use "Sea of Japan". The United Nations confirmed its adoption of "Sea of Japan" in its official documents in March 2004, [25], but also stated that "the practice of the UN Secretariat is to use, in the absence of an internationally agreed standard, the most widespread and generally recognized denomination. This practice is without any prejudice to the position of any Member State of the United Nations on a particular appellation and does not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations. The use of an appellation by the Secretariat based on the practice is without prejudice to any negotiations or agreements between the interested parties and should not be interpreted as advocating or endorsing any party’s position, and can in no way be invoked by any party in support of a particular position in the matter." [26] The United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names takes place every five years at United Nations Headquarters in New York. ... The International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) is an intergovernmental international organization established in 1921. ... The United Nations (UN) is an international organization whose stated aims are to facilitate co-operation in international law, international security, economic development, and social equity. ...


IHO and UNSCGN resolutions endorse the principle of the simultaneous use of different names when countries sharing a geographical feature do not agree on a common name. [27]


Response of media and publishers

Some publishers and media outlets have responded to the dispute by either adopting both names on maps, or—in very rare cases—leaving the area blank, until a consensus can be reached between Japan and Korea.

  • In 1997, Rand McNally, one of the largest mapmakers in the United States, adopted a policy of concurrent use of both names, "East Sea" and "Sea of Japan".
  • In 1999, the National Geographic Society recognized that the name was legitimately disputed by South Korea. Under its policy (if a geographical feature is shared by more than one nation, and its name is disputed, use the most commonly recognized form of the name first and label the disputed name in parentheses), "Sea of Japan" appears as the primary label and "East Sea" appears below in parentheses. [28]
  • Many other publishers have responded similarly, such as The Times (of London), Financial Times, Encyclopedia Britannica,[29] Microsoft Encarta,[30] [31] Columbia Encyclopedia,[32] World Book Encyclopedia,[33] American Heritage Dictionary,[34] World Atlas,[35] and About.com, usually including "East Sea" as the secondary label.
  • In 2003, the French Defense Ministry issued nautical maps included both terms "Sea of Japan" and "East Sea". [36][37] It set back to "Sea of Japan" as a mono-name in the map issued in 2004.[38]
  • After receiving protests in 2006, Google added the term "East Sea" near the Korean coast of Google Earth, with "Sea of Japan" remaining on the opposite side. [40]

Title page of the 1879 Business Atlas, from DavidRumsey. ... Flag of the National Geographic Society The National Geographic Society, is a not-for-profit scientific organization based in the United States. ... The United States Board on Geographic Names (BGN) is an American federal body whose purpose is to establish and maintain uniform usage of geographic names throughout the U.S. government. ... Obverse of the Great Seal of the United States. ... The World Factbook 2006 (government edtion) cover. ... CIA redirects here. ... Google, Inc. ...

Historical maps and studies

  • (SK) In July 2001, Korea produced a report on the names used on maps published in Europe, mostly in the 18th century, possessed by the British Library, claiming that of 90 maps which name the sea, 62 refer to it as "Sea of Korea", 8 as "East Sea", 2 as both "Sea of Korea" and "East Sea", and 10 use "Sea of Japan".[41] (Focus of Research: 18th century)
  • (SK) In December 2002, South Korea produced a report on the names used on 228 maps published prior to 1800 that are held by the U.S. Library of Congress, claiming that two-thirds of the maps naming the sea used "East Sea", "Sea of Korea", or variants. Of the 103 maps that named the sea, the report claims 66 percent named it "Sea of Korea" and/or "East Sea" or variants. [42] (Focus of Research: 18th century). The authors of this study interpretted maps containing "Oriental Sea" as "variations" of "East Sea."
  • (J) In September 2003, Japan produced a report [43] on the names used on maps published in Europe between 1801 and 1861 possessed by the British Library and the University of Cambridge, claiming that in the British Library, of 37 maps [44] containing the areas surrounding the sea, 32 or 86.5% used "Sea of Japan" and 5 used "Sea of Korea". In the University of Cambridge, it found 21 maps [45] containing the areas surrounding the sea, of which 18 or 85.7% used "Sea of Japan" and 3 used "Sea of Korea". [46] (Focus of Research: First half of the 19th century)
  • (J) In March 2004, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan published a report [47] with the list of maps it investigated [48] on the investigation of maps at the Bibliothèque nationale de France. The study claims that from the 1,495 maps possessed by the Bibliotheque Nationale de France and published between the 16th and 19th century show that of 407 maps for which a name was recorded, 249, or 61% bore the name "Sea of Japan" and 60, or 15% bore the name "Sea of Korea". It found no maps that bore the name "East Sea". Furthermore, the report claims, of the maps published in the first half of the 19th century, 90.0% or 99 maps bore the name "Sea of Japan" and of the maps published in the latter half of the 19th century 100% or 105 maps bore the same name. Japan objects to translating "Oriental Sea" in various European languages as the equivalent of the "East Sea" in English. [49] (Focus of Research: 16th~19th centuries)
  • (SK) South Korea's Ministry of Maritime Affairs & Fisheries website states that by its count, of 763 historic maps in various government and university libraries worldwide, 440 maps use "Sea of Korea", "East Sea", or variants, and 123 use "Sea of Japan" or variants. [53] (retrieved October 2005). This report includes a reference to the 2002 University of Southern California's "[54] Sea of Korea maps digital archive", built primarily from a collection geared exclusively to documenting the use of alternate names to this body of water (the David Lee Collection of maps). (Focus of Research: All of Cartographic History)

British Library Ossulston St entrance, with distinctive red logo. ... The Great Hall interior. ... British Library Ossulston St entrance, with distinctive red logo. ... The University of Cambridge, located in Cambridge, England, is the second-oldest university in the English-speaking world, with a reputation as one of the worlds most prestigious universities. ... British Library Ossulston St entrance, with distinctive red logo. ... The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (外務省; gaimu-sho) is one of the ministries of the Japanese government. ... The new buildings of the library. ... The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan (外務省; gaimu-sho) is one of the ministries of the Japanese government. ... The Geographical Survey Institute of Japan, abbreviated GSI (Japanese: 国土地理院, Kokudo Chiri-in) is the national institution responsible for surveying and mapping the national land of Japan. ... The Great Hall interior. ... The University of Southern California (commonly referred to as USC, SC, Southern California, and incorrectly as Southern Cal[1]), located in the University Park neighborhood in Los Angeles, California, USA, was founded in 1880, making it Californias oldest private research university. ...

See also

Korea (both North and South) and Japan have had disputes on many issues over the years. ... Anti-Japanese sentiment refers to the view of the Japanese people or of the Japanese nation with suspicion or hostility. ... Dokdo is a group of disputed islets in the Sea of Japan (East Sea) currently administered by South Korea, but also claimed by Japan (where they are known as Takeshima). ... The name of the body of water separating the Arabian Peninsula from Iran has been the subject of some dispute in recent decades. ...

External links

  • East Sea Map Study — by the South Korean Overseas Information Service
  • Society for East Sea, Seoul National University, hosted by VANK
  • Naming of "Japan Sea". Japan Coast Guard
  • Sea of Japan — Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs defends the use of "Sea of Japan".
  • Sea of Japan - A Globally Established Name (Video Clips)

References

  1. ^ a b Efforts of the Government of Japan in Response to the Issue of the Name of the Sea of Japan (1) The 8th UNCSGN, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
  2. ^ Ministry of Foreign Affiars and Trade. East Sea.
  3. ^ a b c d Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries 2005. The Name East Sea Used for Two Millennia.
  4. ^ http://www.momaf.go.kr/eng/intl/eastsea/I_intro.asp
  5. ^ 【東海表記】南北と周辺国の立場, Chosun Ilbo (ja), 2002/10/28
  6. ^ Korea Inside Out: Seas, The People's Korea, 1998
  7. ^ a b c Change of the names adopted in the Foreign Maps, Japan Coast Guard
  8. ^ a b c Transition of Sea of China, Japan, Korea, and Oriental Sea, MOFA of Japan 2005
  9. ^ Japanese Basic Position on the Naming of the "Japan Sea", Japan Coast Guard[1]
  10. ^ Naming of the Sea of Japan "dialogue in 23rd UNGEGN" 1. Japan's argument (3), The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, March 2006
  11. ^ a b Sea of Japan - A Globally Established Name (Video Clips), The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
  12. ^ Even Japan Once Used Sea of Joseon (Korea) Instead of Sea of Japan, the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of South Korea
  13. ^ 北韓問題研究所 資料室
  14. ^ History of the name "Sea of Japan", The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2003
  15. ^ "Fishery Policies", Shanghai Fisheries University
  16. ^ For example, "Vietnamese fishermen victims of East Sea pirates", VietNamNet Bridge, 29/06/2006; "Tropical storm Bilis gathers steam near Philippines", Thanh Nien Daily, July 12, 2006; Google News Search: east-sea Vietnam
  17. ^ Encyclopedia Americana"Baltic Sea, or the East Sea"
  18. ^ Endre Bojtar, Foreword to the Past: A Cultural History of the Baltic People, p. 7, Central European University Press 1999 (ISBN 963-9116-42-4)[2] "The Baltic Sea has been called "East Sea" since 1553 (or earlier). The use of "Baltic Sea" occurred no earlier than the end of 18th century."
  19. ^ The Historical precedent for the "East Sea", VANK[3]
  20. ^ Why the 'Sea of Korea'?, Daum, 2006-1-24[4]
  21. ^ 한반도 우측 바다는 '일본해', iTimes, 2006-03-28[5]
  22. ^ 민족정기모임 `동해찾기' 운동 본격화, Yahoo! Korea, 2006-01-22[6]
  23. ^ [단독]노 대통령, 일본에 "동해를 '평화의 海'로" 제의 파장 [7]
  24. ^ Daum 미디어다음[8]
  25. ^ The Policy of the United Nations Concerning the Naming of "Sea of Japan", The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, June 2004[9]
  26. ^ The Practice of the Secretariat of the United Nations Concerning the Naming of the Sea Area between Korea and Japan, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of South Korea[10]
  27. ^ East Sea, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of South Korea[11]
  28. ^ http://www.nationalgeographic.com/maps/updates/seaofjapan.html
  29. ^ http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9002399?query=East%20Sea&ct
  30. ^ http://encarta.msn.com/encnet/refpages/search.aspx?q=East+Sea&Submit2=Go
  31. ^ http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_1861672742/East_Sea.html
  32. ^ http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/world/A0825981.html
  33. ^ http://www.worldbook.com/wb/Article?id=ar285620
  34. ^ http://www.bartleby.com/61/68/J0016800.html
  35. ^ http://worldatlas.com/webimage/countrys/asia/eastsea.htm
  36. ^ Q&A on the Issue of the Name "Sea of Japan", The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, February 2003[12]
  37. ^ Examples of Concurrent Use of The East Sea/Sea of japan, The Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade of South Korea[13]
  38. ^ フランス海軍海洋情報部刊行の海図目録-「日本海」単独標記に-, Japan Coast Guard, 2004-7-13[14]
  39. ^ The World Factbook FAQ: Policies and Procedures: Factbook uses Sea of Japan whereas other publications label it East Sea. What is your policy on naming geographic features?, The Central Intelligence Agency of the United States[15]
  40. ^ http://www.asiamedia.ucla.edu/article-eastasia.asp?parentid=50214
  41. ^ http://www.korea.net/news/issues/html/eastsea_world_3.html
  42. ^ http://www.korea.net/News/Issues/issueDetailView.asp?board_no=350&title=East%20Sea%20Map%20Study
  43. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/study-f.html
  44. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/study-l1.html
  45. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/study-l1.html#2
  46. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/study-f.html
  47. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/study-2f.pdf
  48. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/study-2l.pdf
  49. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/study.html
  50. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/study-4.html
  51. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/maritime/japan/study-3.html English abstract
  52. ^ http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/area/nihonkai_k/usa/pdfs/maplist.pdf
  53. ^ http://www.mofat.go.kr/me/me_a009/me_b035/me09_01.jsp
  54. ^ http://www.usc.edu/libraries/collections/sea_of_korea/

  Results from FactBites:
 
Sea of Japan naming dispute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (3236 words)
Japan insists that the name "Sea of Japan" had internationally established itself as a single name by the early 19th century during a period in which Japan was under the isolation policy (Sakoku).
Japan argues that because the marginal sea is separated by the Japanese Archipelago from the Pacific Ocean, the sea was named Sea of Japan.
Sea of Japan — Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs defends the use of "Sea of Japan".
MOFA: The Policy of the United Nations Concerning the Naming of "Sea of Japan" (225 words)
In March 2004, the United Nations Secretariat confirmed its policy that 'Sea of Japan' is the standard geographical term and as such is to be used in official documents of the United Nations.
In response to the enquiry by the Government of Japan, the United Nations Secretariat officially replied on 10 March 2004, that 'Sea of Japan' is the standard geographical term and as such is to be used in official documents of the United Nations.
It is confirmed that the name 'Sea of Japan' is authorized by the United Nations which is the most comprehensive and neutral international organization with the participation of 191 member states including both Japan and the Republic of Korea (ROK), and the most proper forum to represent the collective will of the international community.
  More results at FactBites »


 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.