This is a disambiguation page — a navigational aid which lists other pages that might otherwise share the same title. If an article link referred you here, you might want to go back and fix it to point directly to the intended page.
Sena is whether the facts established at the evidentiary hearing demonstrated it was feasible for the district court to make a reliable determination of his competence nineteen years after entry of his plea.
Sena would have us hold because much time has passed and the recollections of the witnesses were less than perfect, the hearing was not feasible as a matter of law.
Sena had been responding positively to treatment of his mental illness, and "what we had in mind here was an extended period of treatment" that would further benefit Mr.
Feeds |
Contact