|
In tort law, the standard of care is the degree of prudence and caution required of an individual who is under a duty of care. A breach of the standard is necessary for a successful action in negligence. Image File history File links Legal portal image File history Legend: (cur) = this is the current file, (del) = delete this old version, (rev) = revert to this old version. ...
This article needs to be cleaned up to conform to a higher standard of quality. ...
This article concerns the common-law legal system, as contrasted with the civil law legal system; for other meanings of the term, within the field of law, see common law (disambiguation). ...
An intentional tort is a category of torts that describes a civil wrong resulting from an intentional act on the part of the tortfeasor. ...
In common law, battery is the tort of intentionally causing harmful or offensive contact with another person. ...
In criminal law, kidnapping is the taking away of a person against the persons will, usually to hold the person in false imprisonment (confinement without legal authority) for ransom or in furtherance of another crime. ...
Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED) is a common law tort claim for intentional conduct that results in extreme emotional distress. ...
Trespass to chattels is a tort whereby the infringing party has intentionally interfered with another persons lawful possession of a chattel. ...
Trespass to land is a common law tort that is committed when an individual intentionally enters the land of another. ...
In law, conversion is a tort that deals with the wrongful interference with goods. ...
In law, detinue is a common law remedy to obtain the return of chattels (personal property or portable property) that have been wrongly converted to the use of another person, or are being unlawfully withheld from a person with good title to the chattel. ...
Trover signifies finding. ...
In English and American law, and systems based on them, libel and slander are two forms of defamation (or defamation of character), which is the tort or delict of making a false statement of fact that injures someones reputation. ...
The right to privacy is the right to control information about yourself in two situations. ...
Abuse of process is a common law intentional tort. ...
Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort. ...
Tortious interference, in the common law of tort, occurs when a person intentionally damages the plaintiffs contractual or other business relationships. ...
Consent (as a term of jurisprudence) is a possible justification against civil or criminal liability. ...
Necessity (as a term of jurisprudence) is a possible justification for breaking the law. ...
Self-defense and defense of others (sometimes called alter ego defense or defense of a third person) are a pair of legal theories under which otherwise tortious or illegal acts may be justified when committed for the purpose of protecting oneself, or for the purpose of protecting another person. ...
In law, negligence is a type of tort or delict that can be either criminal or civil in nature. ...
Negligent hiring is a cause of action in tort law that arises where one party is held liable for negligence because they placed another party in a position of authority or responsibility, and an injury resulted because of this placement. ...
Negligent entrustment is a cause of action in tort law that arises where one party (the entrustor) is held liable for negligence because they negligently provided another party (the entrustee) with a dangerous instrumentality, and the entrusted party caused injury to a third party with that instrumentality. ...
The tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress is a controversial legal theory and is not accepted in many United States jurisdictions. ...
In law, a duty of care is the legal requirement that a person exercise a reasonable standard of care to prevent injury of others. ...
In the law, a proximate cause is an event sufficiently related to a legally recognizable injury to be held the cause of that injury. ...
From the Latin, meaning literally, the thing speaks for itself, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applied to claims which, as a matter of law, do not have to be explained beyond the obvious facts. ...
The calculus of negligence is a term coined by Judge Learned Hand and describes a process for determining whether a legal duty of care has been breached (see negligence). ...
The eggshell skull rule (or thin-skull rule) is a legal doctrine used in both tort law and criminal law that holds an individual liable for all consequences resulting from their activities leading to an injury to another person, even if the victim suffers unusual damages due to a pre...
Vicarious Liability An employer is vicariously liable for negligent acts or omissions by his employee in the course of employment whether or not such an act or omission was specifically authorised by the employer. ...
Under the attractive nuisance doctrine of the law of torts, a landowner may be held liable for injuries to children trespassing on the land if the injury is caused by a hazardous object or condition on the land that is likely to attract children, who are unable to appreciate the...
Trespasser (released in 1998) was a game taking place in the world of Jurassic Park. ...
A licensee is a term used in the law of torts to describe a person who is on the property of another, despite the fact that the property is not open to the general public, because the owner of the property has allowed the licensee to enter. ...
An invitee is a term used in the law of torts to describe a person who is on the property of another because that property owner has chosen to hold the property open to some portion of the general public, because the owner of the property has allowed the licensee...
Contributory negligence is a common law defence to a claim or action in tort. ...
Comparative negligence is a system of apportioning recovery for a tort based on a comparison of the plaintiffs negligence with the defendants. ...
This is a defense in the law of torts. ...
An intervening cause is a potential defense to the tort of negligence, if it is an unforseeable, and therefore superseding intervening cause, rather than a foreseeable intervening cause. ...
Strict liability is a legal doctrine in tort law that makes a person responsible for the damages caused by their actions regardless of culpability (fault) or mens rea. ...
An ultrahazardous activity in the common law of torts is one that is so inherently dangerous that a person engaged in such an activity can be held strictly liable for injuries caused to another person, even if the person engaged in the activity took every reasonable precaution to prevent others...
Product liability encompasses a number of legal claims that allow an injured party to recover financial compensation from the manufacturer or seller of a product. ...
Nuisance is a common law tort. ...
A contract is any legally-enforceable promise or set of promises made by one party to another and, as such, reflects the policies represented by freedom of contract. ...
Property law is the law that governs the various forms of ownership in real property (land as distinct from personal or moveable possessions) and in personal property, within the common law legal system. ...
In the law, a will or testament is a document by which a person (the testator) regulates the rights of others over his property or family after death. ...
The law of trusts and estates is generally considered the body of law which governs the management of personal affairs and the disposition of property of an individual in anticipation and the event of such persons incapacity or death, also known as the law of successions in civil law. ...
Criminal law (also known as penal law) is the body of law that punishes criminals for committing offences against the state. ...
The law of evidence governs the use of testimony (eg. ...
In the common law, a tort is a civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy. ...
In law, a duty of care is the legal requirement that a person exercise a reasonable standard of care to prevent injury of others. ...
In law, negligence is a type of tort or delict that can be either criminal or civil in nature. ...
The requirements of the standard are closely dependant on circumstances. Whether the standard of has been breached is determined by the trier of fact, and is usually phrased in terms of the reasonable person. It was famously described in Vaughn v. Menlove (1837) as whether the individual "proceed[ed] with such reasonable caution as a prudent man would have exercised under such circumstances". A trier of fact is the person or group of persons in a trial who make findings of fact as opposed to rulings of law. ...
The reasonable man or reasonable person standard is a legal fiction that originated in the development of the common law. ...
In certain industries and professions, the standard of care is determined by the standard that would be exercised by the reasonably prudent manufacturer of a product, or the reasonably prudent professional in that line of work. Such a test is used to determine whether a doctor is liable for medical malpractice. Medical malpractice is a broad term which covers both the public perception of adverse events during medical care, and a legal definition of negligence. ...
A special standard of care also applies to children, who are held to the behavior that is reasonable for a child of similar age, experience, and intelligence. |