FACTOID # 162: You are more likely to be reported as having been killed by lightning in Cuba than in any other country.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > The verifiability theory of meaning

In the early twentieth century, the logical positivists put forth what came to be known as the verifiability theory of meaning. The verifiability theory was based upon the verifiability principle, which states that for a statement to have meaning, the statement must be empirically verifiable. However, the verifiability principle is not empirically verifiable, hence if it is true then it is meaningless, and if it is meaningless, then it cannot be true, hence it cannot be true.


Prior to the development of the verifiability principle, Immanuel Kant classified statements into two categories, a set of analytic statements, and a set of synthetic statements [1] (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analytic-synthetic/). For Kant, the truth of a mathematical statement had to be determined inside the mind, and he called any such statement analytic, in contrast to a synthetic statement like "the sky is blue", which requires the use of sensory perception to verify.


The classification terms analytic/synthetic have fallen into disuse in contemporary formal logic, but the idea of a statement being empirically verifiable was taken up by in the twentieth century by the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle, who used it to build upon the theory of language that Ludwig Wittgenstein had introduced in his Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. In essence, Kant's synthetic statements are what are now called empirical statements. If an empirical statement is true, it might be empirically verifiable, and if an empirical statement is false, it might be empirically falsifiable. But, the verifiability priniciple itself is indeed an example of one of Kant's analytic statements, and hence is not a statement which is empirically verifiable. Hence, if the only kind of statements which are to be given meaning, are those statements which are empirically verifiable, then the verifiability principle is meaningless. Hence, the verifiability priniciple asserts its own meaninglessness. The verifiability theory of meaning is also closely related to the correspondence theory of truth.


  Results from FactBites:
 
Verifiability theory of meaning - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (268 words)
In the early twentieth century, the logical positivists put forth what came to be known as the verifiability theory of meaning.
The verifiability theory was based upon the verifiability principle, which states " The statement is literally meaningful (it expresses a proposition) if and only if it is either analytic or empirically verifiable." However, the verifiability principle is not empirically verifiable, though there is speculation that there is an analytic proof possible.
The verifiability theory of meaning is also closely related to the correspondence theory of truth.
  More results at FactBites »


 
 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms, 0825, e