|
A third party beneficiary, in the law of contracts, is a person who may have the right to sue on a contract, despite not having originally been a party to the contract. This right arises where the third party is the intended beneficiary of the contract, as opposed to an incidental beneficiary. It vests when the third party relies on or assents to the relationship, and gives the third party the right to sue either the promisor or the promisee of the contract, depending on the circumstances under which the relationship was created. Image File history File links Legal portal image File history Legend: (cur) = this is the current file, (del) = delete this old version, (rev) = revert to this old version. ...
A contract is any promise or set of promises made by one party to another for the breach of which the law provides a remedy. ...
This article concerns the common-law legal system, as contrasted with the civil law legal system; for other meanings of the term, within the field of law, see common law (disambiguation). ...
Contract theory is the body of legal thought that investigates normative and conceptual problems in contract law. ...
Offer and acceptance analysis is a tool in contract law used to determine whether a contract exists between two parties. ...
The mailbox rule or the postal acceptance rule is a term of common law contracts which determines when a contract has been formed where the parties are communicating via the mail. ...
In the law of contracts, the mirror image rule states that an offer must be accepted exactly without modifications. ...
In contract law, an invitation to treat is an action by one party which may appear to be a contractual offer but which is actually inviting others to make an offer of their own. ...
(Note, Consideration under English law is dealt with separately) Consideration is a central concept in the common law of contracts. ...
Capacity is a legal term that refers to the ability of persons to make certain binding dispositions of their rights, such as entering into contracts, making gifts, or writing a valid will. ...
Duress (coercion) (as a term of jurisprudence) is a possible defense, via excuse, by which a defendant may argue that they should not be held criminally liable for actions which broke the law. ...
Undue influence (as a term in jurisprudence) is an equitable doctrine that involves one person taking advantage of a position of power over another person. ...
In contract law, an illusory promise is one that courts will not enforce. ...
The Statute of Frauds refers to a requirement in many common law jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically contractual obligations, be evidenced by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by their authorized agent. ...
The parol evidence rule enacts a principle of the law of contracts that presumes that a written contract emodies the complete agreement between the parties thereto. ...
In contract law a mistake is incorrect understanding by one or more parties to a contract and may be used as grounds to invalidate the agreement. ...
In contract law, a misrepresentation is when a party to a contract makes a representation, warranting or promising something that is not in the terms of the contract, that has the effect of inducing a party in entering the contract, yet is revealed to be false. ...
Frustration of purpose is a term used in the law of contracts to describe a defense to an action for non-performance based on the occurance of an unforseen event which makes performance impossible or commercially impracticable. ...
Modal logic, or (less commonly) intensional logic is the branch of logic that deals with sentences that are qualified by modalities such as can, could, might, may, must, possibly, and necessarily, and others. ...
Unconscionability is a term used in contract law to describe a defense against the enforcement of a contract based on the presence of terms unfair to one party. ...
An assignment is a term used with similar meanings in the law of contracts and in the law of real estate. ...
Delegation is a term used in the law of contracts to describe the act of giving another person the responsibility of carrying out the performance agreed to in a contract. ...
Novation, or its full title: Novation Electronic Music Systems, is an English company founded in 1992 and largely produces synthesizers. ...
Breach of contract is a legal concept in which a binding agreement or bargained-for exchange is not honored by one of the parties to the contract by non-performance or interference with the other partys performance. ...
Anticipatory repudiation (or anticipatory breach) is a term in the law of contracts that describes a declaration by one party (the promissing party) to a contract that they do not intend to live up to their obligations under the contract. ...
Cover is a term used in the law of contracts to describe a remedy available to a merchant buyer who has received an anticipatory repudiation of a contract for the receipt of goods. ...
Liquidated damages is a term use in the law of contracts to describe a contractual term which establishes damages to be paid to one party if the other party should breach the contract. ...
In the common law, a tort is a civil wrong for which the law provides a remedy. ...
Property law is the law that governs the various forms of ownership in real property (land as distinct from personal or moveable possessions) and in personal property, within the common law legal system. ...
In the law, a will or testament is a documentary instrument by which a person (the testator) regulates the rights of others over the testators property or family after their death. ...
The term trust has several meanings: In general, trust refers to an aspect of a relationship between two parties, by which a given situation is mutually understood, and commitments are made toward actions in favor of a desired outcome. ...
Criminal law (also known as penal law) is the body of law that punishes criminals for committing offences against the state. ...
The law of evidence governs the use of testimony (eg. ...
Law (a loanword from Old Norse lag), in politics and jurisprudence, is a set of rules or norms of conduct which mandate, proscribe or permit specified relationships among people and organizations, provide methods for ensuring the impartial treatment of such people, and provide punishments for those who do not follow...
A contract is any promise or set of promises made by one party to another for the breach of which the law provides a remedy. ...
A party is a person or group of persons that compose a single entity which can be identified as one for the purposes of the law. ...
Intended vs. incidental beneficiary
In order for a third party beneficiary to have any rights under the contract, he must be an intended beneficiary, as opposed to an incidental beneficiary. The burden is on the third party to plead and prove that he was indeed an intended beneficiary.
Incidental beneficiary An incidental beneficiary is a party who stands to benefit from the execution of the contract, although that was not the intent of either party. For example, if party A hires party B to rennovate party A's house, and insists that party B use a particular house painter - party C - because that house painter has an excellent reputation, then the house painter is an incidental beneficiary. Neither party A nor party B is entering into the contract with the particular intent to benefit party C. A simply wants his house properly rennovated; B simply wants to be paid to do the rennovation. If the contract is breached by either party in a way that results in party C never getting hired for the job, party C nonetheless has no rights to recover anything under the contract. Similarly, if party A were to promise to buy party B a Cadillac, and were to later go back on that promise, General Motors would have no grounds upon which to recover for the lost sale.
Intended beneficiary The distinction that creates an intended beneficiary is that one party - called the promisee - makes an agreement to provide some consideration to a second party - called the promisor - in exchange for the promisor's agreement to provide some product, service, or support to the the third party beneficiary named in the contract. The promisee must have an intention to benefit the third party - but this requirement has an unusual meaning under the law. Although there is a presumption that the promisor intends to promote the interests of the third party in this way, if party A contract with party B to have a thousand killer bees delivered to the home of Party A's worst enemy, party C, then C is still considered to be the intended beneficiary of that contract. (Note, Consideration under English law is dealt with separately) Consideration is a central concept in the common law of contracts. ...
Africanized bees are hybrids of the African honeybee, Apis mellifera scutellata (or possibly ), with various European honeybees such as the Italian bee A. m. ...
There are two common situations in which the intended beneficiary relationship is created. One is the creditor beneficiary, which is created where party A owes some debt to party C, and party A agrees to provide some consideration to party B in exchange for party B's promise to pay party C some part of the amount owed. Debt is that which is owed. ...
The other is the donee beneficiary, which is created where party A wishes to make a gift to party C, and party A agrees to provide some consideration to party B in exchange for party B's promise to pay party C the amount of the gift. Under old common law principles, the donee beneficiary actually had a greater claim to the benefits this created; however, such distinctions have since been abolished. This page is about gifts in the common English-language sense. ...
This article concerns the common-law legal system, as contrasted with the civil law legal system; for other meanings of the term, within the field of law, see common law (disambiguation). ...
Vesting of rights Once the beneficiary's rights have vested, the original parties to the contract are both bound to perform the contract. Any effort by the promisor or the promisee to rescind or modify the contract at that point are void. Indeed, if the promisee changed his mind and offered to pay the promisor money not to perform, the third party could sue the promisee for tortious interference with the third party's contract rights.
There are three tests used to determine whether the third party beneficiary's rights have vested:
- if the beneficiary knows of and has detrimentally relied on the rights created
- if the beneficiary has expressly assented to the contract at the request of one of the parties
- if the beneficiary files a lawsuit to enforce the contract
Estoppel is a concept that prevents a party from acting in a certain way because it is not equitable to do so. ...
Breach and defenses Where a contract for the benefit of a third party is breached by the non-performance of the promisor, the beneficiary can sue the promisor for the breach just as any party to a contract can sue the other. Because the rights of the third party are defined by the contract created between the promisor and the promisee, the promisor may assert against the beneficiary any defenses to the contract that could be asserted against the promisee. These include all of the traditional basis by which the formation of a contract may be challenged: lack of capacity, lack of consideration, the Statute of Frauds, etc.; and all of the traditional bases by which non-performance on the contract may be excused: failure of consideration, impossibility, illegality, frustration of purpose, etc. Capacity is a legal term that refers to the ability of persons to make certain binding dispositions of their rights, such as entering into contracts, making gifts, or writing a valid will. ...
(Note, Consideration under English law is dealt with separately) Consideration is a central concept in the common law of contracts. ...
The Statute of Frauds refers to a requirement in many common law jurisdictions that certain kinds of transactions, typically contractual obligations, be evidenced by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought, or by their authorized agent. ...
Frustration of purpose is a term used in the law of contracts to describe a defense to an action for non-performance based on the occurance of an unforseen event which makes performance impossible or commercially impracticable. ...
Because the promisor can assert any defenses that could be asserted against the promisee, the beneficiary also becomes liable for counterclaims on the contract that the promisor could establish against the promisee. This liability can never exceed the amount that the promisor owes under the contract. In other words, if the promisor is owed money by the promisee, any award to the third party for the promisor's failure to perform can be reduced by the amount thus owed. If the promisor is owed more than the value of the contract, the beneficiary's recovery will be reduced to nothing (but the third party can never be made to assume an actual debt).
A creditor beneficiary can sue both the promisor and the promisee, but the beneficiary can not recover against both. If the suit is successful against one party to the contract, the other party will be dismissed. Because the creditor beneficiary is receiving the performance of the promisor in order to fulfill the promisee's debt, the failure of the promisor to perform means that the beneficiary can still sue the promisee to recover the preexisting debt. The failure of performance simply means that the debt has never been paid.
A donee beneficiary can not sue the promisee, because the promisee's act is gratuitous. Courts simply will not allow a party who has been promised a gift to sue to compel delivery of the gift. However, if the beneficiary has relied to his detriment on the promisee's assertion that the promisor would perform, the beneficiary may sue the promisee under a promissory estoppel theory. Estoppel is a concept that prevents a party from acting in a certain way because it is not equitable to do so. ...
Rights that accrue to the promisee The promisee can also sue the promisor for failing to pay the third party beneficiary. Under the common law, such suits were barred, but courts have since determined that the promisee can sue for specific performance of the contract, provided that the beneficiary has not already sued the promisor. Furthermore, if the promisee was in debt to a creditor beneficiary, and the failure of the promisor to perform caused the promisee to be held liable for that debt, the promisee can sue to recover the amount of the debt. In the law of remedies, a specific performance is a demand of a party to perform a specific act. ...
|
Feeds |
Contact