TRADING BLOWS, or Trading licks, or - blows, etc., is an endurance test in which the participants (usually two boys or young men) take turns, alternating administering a blow to an opponent and assuming the agreed position (e.g. bending over an object or grabbing the ankles) to endure the next one, using the same implement (e.g. a fraternity paddle), until only the winner can still bring himself to endure the gradually increasing pain in the progressively tormented target-part of their anatomy (usually the posterior -then it is a form of spanking-, or the cheeks), which in the interest of fairness should either be bared or only covered by a common uniform. As the blows are not given by the same person but by the parties themselves, the strongest-armed one actually has an unfair (but not always decisive) physical advantage. Jump to: navigation, search Spanking (or smacking, whacking, etc. ...
Such rather macho display of willpower restraining the instinct to avoid pain can have various finalities, including:
a punishment, especially for quarelling, possibly the origin of the practice (this ritulised alternative to a fight should also make them realize the futility of physical aggression)
a motivation test, especally as part of an initiation process, such as hazing
an obedience test, as in certain paddle games (possibly really an excuse for the rather sadistic amusement of the seniors)
a duel, either personal or as champions representing similar, especially rivalling, groups
as a game, either to 'proudly' display once tenacity or in the persuit of a sadist and/or masochistic, erotic or pain-addicted, kick
The Glenbrook North High School hazing incident concerned many people worldwide Hazing is often ritualistic harassment, abuse, or humiliation with requirements to perform meaningless tasks, sometimes as a way of initiation into a social group. ...
Sources and References
[game in a scout troop in St.Louis, Missouri in the 1950s- scroll to "the Baker paddle"]
The focus of U.S. trade policy now shifted toward the export side, as the government increasingly resorted to the practice of "aggressive unilateralism" or "aggressive reciprocity." Washington tried to pry open closed foreign markets through the threatened retaliatory imposition of U.S. import barriers if negotiations failed to convince other countries to reduce their own barriers.
After 1980, however, trade was drawn into the realm of highly public "macropolitics," as conflict over import curbs, unilateral market-opening actions, fast-track proposals, and free-trade agreements often engaged the energies of the president, the entire Congress, a wide range of interest groups, and even sectors of the general electorate.
The next year, however, Clinton pushed hard on a trade issue that he viewed as sufficiently critical to his overall legacy that he was again willing to provoke a major split in his own party and risk Al Gore's presidential hopes: congressional approval of "permanent normal trade relations" with China.
The row over the Foreign Sales Corporations Act is not the first time the World Trade Organisation has been forced to step in to arbitrate in disputes between the.
The procedure has proved popular with smaller nations, which have found that by taking trade disputes to the WTO they can win actions against states boasting much greater economic clout.
Sir Leon Brittain, the then trade commissioner, reacted furiously to the US move, but the EU caved in at the end of last year and promised to open up its markets.
Feeds |
Contact