If you are trying to prove that a property P holds for all ordinals then you can apply transfinite induction:
Prove that P(0) holds true; and
prove that for any ordinal b, if P(a) is true for all ordinals a < b then P(b) is true as well.
The latter step is often broken down into two cases: the case for successor ordinals (ordinals which have an immediate predecessor), where the usual inductive approach can be applied (show that P(a) implies P(a + 1)), and the case for limit ordinals, which have no predecessor, and thus cannot be handled by such an argument.
Typically, the case for limit ordinals is approached by noting that a limit ordinal b is (by definition) the supremum of all ordinals a < b and using this fact to prove P(b) assuming that P(a) holds true for all a < b.
The first step above is actually redundant. If P(b) follows from the truth of P(a) for all a < b, then it is simply a special case to say that P(0) is true, since it is vacuously true that P(a) holds for all a < 0.
For example, the ω-model consisting of (the usual natural numbers together with) the set of recursive sets of natural numbers is an ω-model of recursive comprehension (in fact, the smallest one) which is not a model of arithmetical comprehension.
Recursive comprehension serves as our core system, so to state that a theorem is “equivalent” to recursive comprehension merely means that it is provable even in that weak system.
We add to recursive comprehension a weak form of König's lemma, namely the statement that every infinite subtree of the full binary tree (the tree of all finite sequences of 0's and 1's) has an infinite path.
If P(b) follows from the truth of P(a) for all a < b, then it is simply a special case to say that P(0) is true, since it is vacuously true that P(a) holds for all a < 0.
Transfiniterecursion is a notion closely related to transfinite induction, but whereas the latter is a method of proof, the former is a method of definition or construction.
Relationship to AC There is a popular misconception that transfinite induction, or transfiniterecursion, or both, require the axiom of choice.