FACTOID # 158: 84% of people in Finland feel that they are at a low risk of experiencing a burglary - but just look at how many burglaries they have!
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

FACTS & STATISTICS    Simple view

  1. Select countries to view: (hold down Control key and click to select several)

     

     

    Compare:

     

     

  1. Select fact or statistic: (* = graphable)

     

     

     

  2. (OPTIONAL) Compare to statistic: (both need to be graphable)

     

     

     

  3. View result as:

     

       
(OR) SEARCH ALL encyclopedia, stats & forums:   

Encyclopedia > U.S. Congressional Delegations from Iowa

These are tables of congressional delegations from Iowa to the United States Senate and United States House of Representatives.


United States Senate

Class 2 Senators Congress Class 3 Senators
George W. Jones (D) 30th (1847-1849) Augustus C. Dodge (D)
31st (1849-1851)
32nd (1851-1853)
33rd (1853-1855)
34th (1855-1857) James Harlan (R)
35th (1857-1859)
James W. Grimes (R) 36th (1859-1861)
37th (1861-1863)
38th (1863-1865)
39th (1865-1867)
Samuel J. Kirkwood (R)
40th (1867-1869) James Harlan (R)
41st (1869-1871)
James B. Howell (R)
George G. Wright (R) 42nd (1871-1873)
43rd (1873-1875) William B. Allison (R)
44th (1875-1877)
Samuel J. Kirkwood (R) 45th (1877-1879)
46th (1879-1881)
47th (1881-1883)
James W. McDill (R)
James F. Wilson (R) 48th (1883-1885)
49th (1885-1887)
50th (1887-1889)
51st (1889-1891)
52nd (1891-1893)
53rd (1893-1895)
John H. Gear (R) 54th (1895-1897)
55th (1897-1899)
56th (1899-1901)
Jonathan P. Dolliver (R)
57th (1901-1903)
58th (1903-1905)
59th (1905-1907)
60th (1907-1909)
Albert B. Cummins (R)
61st (1909-1911)
Lafayette Young (R)
62nd (1911-1913)
William S. Kenyon (R)
63rd (1913-1915)
64th (1915-1917)
65th (1917-1919)
66th (1919-1921)
67th (1921-1923)
Charles A. Rawson (R)
Smith W. Brookhart (R)
68th (1923-1925)
69th (1925-1927)
Daniel F. Steck (D) David W. Stewart (R)
70th (1927-1929) Smith W. Brookhart (R)
71st (1929-1931)
L. J. Dickinson (R) 72nd (1931-1933)
73rd (1933-1935) Richard Louis Murphy (D)
74th (1935-1937)
Guy M. Gillette (D)
Clyde L. Herring (D) 75th (1937-1939)
76th (1939-1941)
77th (1941-1943)
George A. Wilson (R) 78th (1943-1945)
79th (1945-1947) Bourke B. Hickenlooper (R)
80th (1947-1949)
Guy M. Gillette (D) 81st (1949-1951)
82nd (1951-1953)
83rd (1953-1955)
Thomas E. Martin (R) 84th (1955-1957)
85th (1957-1959)
86th (1959-1961)
Jack R. Miller (R) 87th (1961-1963)
88th (1963-1965)
89th (1965-1967)
90th (1967-1969)
91st (1969-1971) Harold E. Hughes (D)
92nd (1971-1973)
Richard C. Clark (D) 93rd (1973-1975)
94th (1975-1977) John C. Culver (D)
95th (1977-1979)
Roger W. Jepsen (R) 96th (1979-1981)
97th (1981-1983) Charles Grassley (R)
98th (1983-1985)
Tom Harkin (D) 99th (1985-1987)
100th (1987-1989)
101st (1989-1991)
102nd (1991-1993)
103rd (1993-1995)
104th (1995-1997)
105th (1997-1999)
106th (1999-2001)
107th (2001-2003)
108th (2003-2005)
109th (2005-2007)

United States House of Representatives

Congress District
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th
109th
(2005-2007)
Jim Nussle Jim Leach Leonard Boswell Tom Latham Steve King

  Results from FactBites:
 
Idiot Legal Arguments Section Six (7077 words)
US (7th Cir 1988) 868 F2d 236; ("The validity of that process [adopting the 16th Amendment] and if the resulting constitutional amendment are no longer open questions.") US v.
US (ED Wash unpub 1/4/96) 77 AFTR2d 724 aff'd (9th Cir unpub 10/9/96) 78 AFTR2d 6941 ("devoid of merit"); US v.
US (WD Mich unpub 11/23/94) 75 AFTR2d 495, 95 USTC para 50029 ("The [CFR] list does not purport to limit the applicability of statutory sections."; also attempted to argue that an unambiguous statute could not be enforced without a corresponding reg, but 26 USC sec.
Idiot Legal Arguments Section Nine (6699 words)
US (WD Mich unpub 11/23/94) 75 AFTR2d 495, 95 USTC para 50029 ("This convoluted argument is wholly baseless."); (sued unsuccessfully to compel tax-evasion organization, which had given him the instructions that landed him as a defendant in criminal court, to pay for his defense lawyer) US v.
US (ED Mich 1985) 616 F.Supp 246; (not allowed to commence a lawsuit against govt employees by using a substituted service which is not authorized by the federal or state court rules) Salman v.
Peck (1810) 10 US (6 Cranch) 87 at 128; and the burden of proving its unconstitutionality (or the invalidity of its adoption) rests entirely on the litigant who is challenging the law; Brown v.
  More results at FactBites »


 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.