FACTOID # 120: Nepal’s flag isn’t square or rectangular. It’s a double triangle.
 
 Home   Encyclopedia   Statistics   Countries A-Z   Flags   Maps   Education   Forum   FAQ   About 
 
WHAT'S NEW
RECENT ARTICLES
More Recent Articles »
 

SEARCH ALL

FACTS & STATISTICS    Advanced view

Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 

 

(* = Graphable)

 

 


Encyclopedia > Verification principle

In the early twentieth century, the logical positivists put forth what came to be known as the verifiability theory of meaning. The verifiability theory was based upon the verifiability principle, which states that for a statement to have meaning, the statement must be empirically verifiable. However, the verifiability principle is not empirically verifiable, hence if it is true then it is meaningless, and if it is meaningless, then it cannot be true, hence it cannot be true.


Prior to the development of the verifiability principle, Immanuel Kant classified statements into two categories, a set of analytic statements, and a set of synthetic statements [1] (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/analytic-synthetic/). For Kant, the truth of a mathematical statement had to be determined inside the mind, and he called any such statement analytic, in contrast to a synthetic statement like "the sky is blue", which requires the use of sensory perception to verify.


The classification terms analytic/synthetic have fallen into disuse in contemporary formal logic, but the idea of a statement being empirically verifiable was taken up by in the twentieth century by the logical positivists of the Vienna Circle, who used it to build upon the theory of language that Ludwig Wittgenstein had introduced in his Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung. In essence, Kant's synthetic statements are what are now called empirical statements. If an empirical statement is true, it might be empirically verifiable, and if an empirical statement is false, it might be empirically falsifiable. But, the verifiability priniciple itself is indeed an example of one of Kant's analytic statements, and hence is not a statement which is empirically verifiable. Hence, if the only kind of statements which are to be given meaning, are those statements which are empirically verifiable, then the verifiability principle is meaningless. Hence, the verifiability priniciple asserts its own meaninglessness. The verifiability theory of meaning is also closely related to the correspondence theory of truth.


  Results from FactBites:
 
What is the principle of verification? (950 words)
The principle of verification relies on the analysis of the sentences given and extract the analytic and synthetic propositions that underlie the sentences that would be verified.
Verification would be the derivation of ways of observing experiences in the empirical world that would corroborate the synthetic propositions entailed in the sentence.
Strong verification would be propositions that were evidently true or false, either by direct confirmation by the senses or by analytical, 'a priori' propositions that depended upon the laws of logic.
Theology Today - Vol 17, No. 1 - April 1960 - ARTICLE - Theology and Verification (7120 words)
To this extent verification is a psychological notion.
Verification is often construed as the verification of a prediction.
What we rightly seek, when we desire the verification of a factual proposition, is not a demonstration of the logical impossibility of the proposition being false (for this would be a self-contradictory demand), but such weight of evidence as suffices, in the type of case in question, to exclude rational doubt.
  More results at FactBites »


 

COMMENTARY     


Share your thoughts, questions and commentary here
Your name
Your comments
Please enter the 5-letter protection code

Want to know more?
Search encyclopedia, statistics and forums:

 


Lesson Plans | Student Area | Student FAQ | Reviews | Press Releases |  Feeds | Contact
The Wikipedia article included on this page is licensed under the GFDL.
Images may be subject to relevant owners' copyright.
All other elements are (c) copyright NationMaster.com 2003-5. All Rights Reserved.
Usage implies agreement with terms.