Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Germany & Lithuania

Definitions

Consumption: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors.
Consumption > Per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Consumption per capita: This entry is the total natural gas consumed in cubic meters (cu m). The discrepancy between the amount of natural gas produced and/or imported and the amount consumed and/or exported is due to the omission of stock changes and other complicating factors. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m).
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1e+15 population
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic feet per day, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved > Reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Imports per capita: This entry is the total natural gas imported in cubic meters (cu m). Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05. Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent: Natural Gas: Consumption, Million tonnes oil equivalent, as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05
Including LNG > Imports per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1 million population.
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita: Per capita figures expressed per 1,000 population.
Proved > Reserves: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total: Natural Gas: Consumption, Billion cubic metres, share of total (%), as of end of 2004

Notes: Others have less than 0.05%
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.
Proved reserves per capita: This entry is the stock of proved reserves of natural gas in cubic meters (cu m). Proved reserves are those quantities of natural gas, which, by analysis of geological and engineering data, can be estimated with a high degree of confidence to be commercially recoverable from a given date forward, from known reservoirs and under current economic conditions. Figures expressed per capita for the same year.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million: . Figures expressed per million population for the same year.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000: . Figures expressed per thousand population for the same year.

SHOW ALL

LESS

SHARE TWEET EMBED

STAT	Germany	Lithuania
Consumption	78.99 billion cu m Ranked 8th. 24 times more than Lithuania	3.3 billion cu m Ranked 6th.
Consumption > Per capita	1.18 million cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 1st. 19% more than Lithuania	990,125.39 cu m per 1,000 people Ranked 13th.
Consumption per capita	1,175.3 cu m Ranked 16th. 12% more than Lithuania	1,051.18 cu m Ranked 12th.
Imports	87.96 billion cu m Ranked 3rd. 26 times more than Lithuania	3.4 billion cu m Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry	240,000 Terajoules Ranked 4th. 107 times more than Lithuania	2,243 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households	1.35 million Terajoules Ranked 4th. 216 times more than Lithuania	6,255 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers > Per capita	22.5 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th. 8 times more than Lithuania	2.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction	894,900 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 66 times more than Lithuania	13,476 Terajoules Ranked 72nd.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture	10,000 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 8 times more than Lithuania	1,324 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants	18,843 Terajoules Ranked 15th. 26% more than Lithuania	14,921 Terajoules Ranked 18th.
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants > Per capita	0.228 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th.	4.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 7th. 19 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants > Per capita	9.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 47th.	14.22 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 30th. 44% more than Germany
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement	3.76 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 33 times more than Lithuania	115,205 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Production	None	None
Proved reserves	125 billion cu m Ranked 48th.	0.0 Ranked 159th.
Including LNG > Imports	3.42 million Terajoules Ranked 2nd. 30 times more than Lithuania	115,949 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses	10,845 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 23 times more than Lithuania	467 Terajoules Ranked 35th.
Including LNG > Imports > Per capita	41.48 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 10th. 22% more than Lithuania	33.96 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 12th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability	2.75 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 114 times more than Lithuania	24,126 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Net inland availability > Per capita	33.36 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 5 times more than Lithuania	7.07 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th.
Including LNG > Statistical differences > Per capita	399.43 billion Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 10th.	-326,290,864,583.469 Terajoules per 1e+15 peop Ranked 45th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres per million	1.04 Ranked 23th. 15% more than Lithuania	0.902 Ranked 30th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres	85.9 Ranked 6th. 28 times more than Lithuania	3.1 Ranked 53th.
Consumption > Billion cubic feet per day	8.3 Ranked 6th. 28 times more than Lithuania	0.3 Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers per 1000	0.000242 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	0.0322 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 133 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers per 1000	6.01 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Lithuania	0.689 Terajoules Ranked 37th.
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture per million	121.26 Terajoules Ranked 21st.	387.78 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants per 1000	9.84 Terajoules Ranked 46th.	14.22 Terajoules Ranked 30th. 44% more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by households > Per capita	16.37 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Lithuania	1.83 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 34th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks	-41,760 Terajoules Ranked 33th.	744 Terajoules Ranked 16th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers	67,328 Terajoules Ranked 1st.	-39 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector > Per capita	0.412 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 52nd. 10 times more than Lithuania	0.042 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector	34,000 Terajoules Ranked 35th. 236 times more than Lithuania	144 Terajoules Ranked 71st.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction > Per capita	10.85 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Lithuania	3.95 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers	1.86 million Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 187 times more than Lithuania	9,932 Terajoules Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by energy sector per 1000	0.412 Terajoules Ranked 51st. 10 times more than Lithuania	0.0422 Terajoules Ranked 70th.
Including LNG > Consumption by industry and construction per 1000	10.85 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 3 times more than Lithuania	3.95 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry per 1000	1.33 Terajoules Ranked 17th. 81 times more than Lithuania	0.0164 Terajoules Ranked 46th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants per 1000	0.243 Terajoules Ranked 36th. 276 times more than Lithuania	0.000879 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction per 1000	6.61 Terajoules Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Lithuania	3.27 Terajoules Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability per 1000	45.61 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 35% more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Including LNG > Net inland availability per 1000	33.36 Terajoules Ranked 19th. 5 times more than Lithuania	7.07 Terajoules Ranked 48th.
Proved > Reserves per capita	2,147.3 cu m Ranked 65th.	0.0 Ranked 147th.
Imports per capita	1,154.67 cu m Ranked 7th. 10% more than Lithuania	1,051.18 cu m Ranked 2nd.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent > Share of total	3.19 Ranked 6th. 27 times more than Lithuania	0.12 Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction > Per capita	6.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 20th. 2 times more than Lithuania	3.27 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Conversion in thermal power plants	811,901 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 17 times more than Lithuania	48,561 Terajoules Ranked 65th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers per million	829.61 Terajoules Ranked 2nd.	-10.54 Terajoules Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry per 1000	2.91 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 4 times more than Lithuania	0.657 Terajoules Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries per 1000	0.17 Terajoules Ranked 31st. 19 times more than Lithuania	0.00908 Terajoules Ranked 41st.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses per 1000	1.21 Terajoules Ranked 31st.	7.9 Terajoules Ranked 3rd. 7 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion > Transport and distribution losses per million	131.5 Terajoules Ranked 30th.	136.78 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 4% more than Germany
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement per 1000	45.61 Terajoules Ranked 29th. 35% more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules Ranked 39th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent per million	0.937 Ranked 23th. 15% more than Lithuania	0.815 Ranked 30th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households and other consumers per 1000	22.51 Terajoules Ranked 12th. 8 times more than Lithuania	2.91 Terajoules Ranked 38th.
Consumption > Million tonnes oil equivalent	77.3 Ranked 6th. 28 times more than Lithuania	2.8 Ranked 53th.
Consumption > Date of > Information	2003 est.	2003 est.
Including LNG > Imports per 1000	41.48 Terajoules Ranked 10th. 22% more than Lithuania	33.96 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks at importers > Per capita	829.61 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 2nd.	-10.541 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 9th.
Including LNG > Consumption by chemical industry > Per capita	2.91 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 14th. 4 times more than Lithuania	0.657 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 33th.
Including LNG > Consumption by natural gas fields and plants	20,000 Terajoules Ranked 32nd. 6667 times more than Lithuania	3 Terajoules Ranked 51st.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry > Per capita	1.33 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 18th. 83 times more than Lithuania	0.016 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 48th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers > Per capita	0.242 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 13th.	32.22 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 13th. 133 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers	496,000 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 211 times more than Lithuania	2,353 Terajoules Ranked 52nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by other consumers > Per capita	6.01 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Lithuania	0.689 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 38th.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries > Per capita	0.17 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 32nd. 19 times more than Lithuania	0.009 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 42nd.
Including LNG > Consumption by petroleum refineries	14,000 Terajoules Ranked 18th. 452 times more than Lithuania	31 Terajoules Ranked 43th.
Including LNG > Consumption by other energy producers	20 Terajoules Ranked 13th.	110 Terajoules Ranked 14th. 6 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption by other industries and construction	544,900 Terajoules Ranked 5th. 49 times more than Lithuania	11,177 Terajoules Ranked 67th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses	100,000 Terajoules Ranked 13th. 4 times more than Lithuania	26,986 Terajoules Ranked 28th.
Including LNG > Consumption for non-energy uses > Per capita	1.21 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 31st.	7.9 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 3rd. 7 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Consumption in agriculture > Per capita	121.26 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 21st.	387.78 Terajoules per 1 million Ranked 7th. 3 times more than Germany
Including LNG > Energy balance requirement > Per capita	45.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 35% more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy	832,744 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 13 times more than Lithuania	63,482 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy > Per capita	10.1 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 49th.	18.59 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 26th. 84% more than Germany
Including LNG > Gross inland availability > Per capita	45.61 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 29th. 35% more than Lithuania	33.74 Terajoules per 1,000 peop Ranked 40th.
Including LNG > Gross inland availability	3.76 million Terajoules Ranked 5th. 33 times more than Lithuania	115,205 Terajoules Ranked 64th.
Proved > Reserves	175.6 billion cu m Ranked 46th.	0.0 Ranked 155th.
Including LNG > Consumption by iron and steel industry	110,000 Terajoules Ranked 6th. 1964 times more than Lithuania	56 Terajoules Ranked 47th.
Consumption > Billion cubic metres > Share of total	3.19 Ranked 6th. 27 times more than Lithuania	0.12 Ranked 53th.
Including LNG > Conversion to other forms of energy per 1000	10.1 Terajoules Ranked 48th.	18.59 Terajoules Ranked 26th. 84% more than Germany
Including LNG > Conversion in other energy-producing plants per 1000	0.228 Terajoules Ranked 29th.	4.37 Terajoules Ranked 7th. 19 times more than Germany
Proved reserves per capita	1,540.41 cu m Ranked 67th.	0.0 Ranked 159th.
Including LNG > Changes in stocks per million	-506.37 Terajoules Ranked 32nd.	217.91 Terajoules Ranked 12th.
Including LNG > Consumption by households per 1000	16.37 Terajoules Ranked 11th. 9 times more than Lithuania	1.83 Terajoules Ranked 35th.

SOURCES: CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2005; Source: Energy Statistics Database | United Nations Statistics Division. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; Wikipedia: List of countries by natural gas consumption; CIA World Factbooks 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.

SHOW ALL

LESS

Citation

Compare Germany and Lithuania in

Agriculture	Environment	Media
Background	Geography	Military
Conflict	Government	People
Cost of living	Health	Religion
Crime	Import	Sports
Culture	Industry	Terrorism
Economy	Labor	Transport
Education	Language	Weather
Energy	Lifestyle

Energy > Natural gas Stats: compare key data on Germany & Lithuania

Definitions

Citation

Compare Germany and Lithuania in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Definitions

APA MLA MHRA CSE AMA Chicago Bluebook Bluebook/JOLT Citation

Compare Germany and Lithuania in

Factoid #133

Related Sectors

Stats

Country profiles

Compare

Embed content

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

Citation