×

Environment Stats: compare key data on Guam & India

Definitions

STAT Guam India HISTORY
Biodiversity > Bird species, threatened 14
Ranked 83th.
80
Ranked 8th. 6 times more than Guam
Biodiversity > Fish species, threatened 9
Ranked 163th.
213
Ranked 2nd. 24 times more than Guam
Biodiversity > Mammal species, threatened 2
Ranked 182nd.
95
Ranked 3rd. 48 times more than Guam
CO2 emissions > Kt 4,080.58 kt
Ranked 115th.
1.27 million kt
Ranked 4th. 312 times more than Guam

CO2 emissions > Kt > Per capita 24.91 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 6th. 21 times more than India
1.2 kt per 1,000 people
Ranked 119th.

CO2 emissions > Kt per 1000 25.86 kt
Ranked 5th. 22 times more than India
1.16 kt
Ranked 116th.

Current issues extirpation of native bird population by the rapid proliferation of the brown tree snake, an exotic, invasive species deforestation; soil erosion; overgrazing; desertification; air pollution from industrial effluents and vehicle emissions; water pollution from raw sewage and runoff of agricultural pesticides; tap water is not potable throughout the country; huge and growing population is overstraining natural resources
Endangered species > Bird species 12
Ranked 77th.
76
Ranked 6th. 6 times more than Guam

Endangered species > Fish species > Number 9
Ranked 146th.
40
Ranked 23th. 4 times more than Guam
Endangered species > Higher plant species > Number 4
Ranked 113th.
246
Ranked 11th. 62 times more than Guam

Endangered species > Mammal species > Number 2
Ranked 175th.
96
Ranked 3rd. 48 times more than Guam
Forest area > Sq. km 260 km²
Ranked 170th.
677,010 km²
Ranked 10th. 2604 times more than Guam

Forest area > Sq. km > Per capita 1.53 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 127th. 2 times more than India
0.619 km² per 1,000 people
Ranked 161st.

Proportion of land area under protection 26.84%
Ranked 40th. 5 times more than India
5.21%
Ranked 164th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban and rural 99.42
Ranked 51st. 9% more than India
91.63
Ranked 123th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban and rural 97.39
Ranked 58th. 3 times more than India
35.09
Ranked 156th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Rural 99.42
Ranked 43th. 11% more than India
89.5
Ranked 104th.

Biodiversity > Plant species > Higher, threatened 4
Ranked 139th.
326
Ranked 9th. 82 times more than Guam
Biodiversity > Number 0.21
Ranked 165th.
39.93
Ranked 8th. 190 times more than Guam

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum 0.213
Ranked 170th.
39.93
Ranked 8th. 188 times more than Guam

Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > Number 12
Ranked 145th.
556
Ranked 31st. 46 times more than Guam
Proportion of land and marine area under protection 5.27%
Ranked 142nd. 5% more than India
5%
Ranked 146th.

Biodiversity > GEF benefits index for biodiversity > 0 = no biodiversity potential to 100 = maximum per million 1.35
Ranked 51st. 40 times more than India
0.034
Ranked 170th.

Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.39%
Ranked 53th. 4 times more than India
23.88%
Ranked 155th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved drinking water sources > Urban 99.42
Ranked 76th. 3% more than India
96.31
Ranked 125th.

Forest area > Sq. km per 1000 1.64 km²
Ranked 121st. 3 times more than India
0.601 km²
Ranked 158th.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 1,111
Ranked 111th.
293,938
Ranked 4th. 265 times more than Guam
Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > Number 12
Ranked 61st.
117
Ranked 11th. 10 times more than Guam
Sanitation > Population with improved sanitation > Urban 97.39
Ranked 63th. 63% more than India
59.73
Ranked 151st.

Water > Proportion of marine area under protection 2.63%
Ranked 93th. 63% more than India
1.61%
Ranked 115th.

Pollution > Carbon dioxide 1999 per 1000 7.22
Ranked 4th. 25 times more than India
0.287
Ranked 119th.
Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Energy depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 146th.
$56.08 billion
Ranked 13th.

Marine protected areas > % of territorial waters 12.99%
Ranked 40th. 2 times more than India
5.81%
Ranked 62nd.

Biodiversity and protected areas > Marine protected areas > % of total surface area 1.03%
Ranked 77th.
1.46%
Ranked 65th. 42% more than Guam
Biodiversity and protected areas > Terrestrial protected areas > % of total surface area 20.86%
Ranked 43th. 4 times more than India
4.77%
Ranked 139th.
Forest area > % of land area 47.27% of land area
Ranked 44th. 2 times more than India
22.77% of land area
Ranked 114th.

Adjusted savings > Adjusted savings > Mineral depletion > Current US$ 0.0
Ranked 137th.
$16.41 billion
Ranked 5th.

Water > Drinking water > Population with improved sanitation > Rural 97.39
Ranked 53th. 4 times more than India
23.88
Ranked 155th.

SOURCES: United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase database, www.fishbase.org.; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre; World Development Indicators database; World Development Indicators database. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; CIA World Factbooks 18 December 2003 to 28 March 2011; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, and International Union for Conservation of Nature, Red List of Threatened Species.; Froese, R. and Pauly, D. (eds). 2008. FishBase. World Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase.org. version (07/2008). Accessed: 28 September 2008.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, ""Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility"" (2006).; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006).; United Nations Environmental Program and the World Conservation Monitoring Centre, as compiled by the World Resources Institute, based on data from national authorities, national legislation and international agreements.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Kiran Dev Pandey, Piet Buys, Ken Chomitz, and David Wheeler's, "Biodiversity Conservation Indicators: New Tools for Priority Setting at the Global Environment Facility" (2006). Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; United Nations Statistics Division. Source tables; Gregg Marland, Tom Boden, and Bob Andres, University of North Dakota, via net publication. Population figures from World Bank: (1) United Nations Population Division. World Population Prospects, (2) United Nations Statistical Division. Population and Vital Statistics Report (various years), (3) Census reports and other statistical publications from national statistical offices, (4) Eurostat: Demographic Statistics, (5) Secretariat of the Pacific Community: Statistics and Demography Programme, and (6) U.S. Census Bureau: International Database.; World Bank staff estimates based on sources and methods in Arundhati Kunte and others' ""Estimating National Wealth: Methodology and Results"" (1998).; United Nations Statistics Division Original html

Citation

Adblocker detected! Please consider reading this notice.

We've detected that you are using AdBlock Plus or some other adblocking software which is preventing the page from fully loading.

We don't have any banner, Flash, animation, obnoxious sound, or popup ad. We do not implement these annoying types of ads!

We need money to operate the site, and almost all of it comes from our online advertising.

Please add www.nationmaster.com to your ad blocking whitelist or disable your adblocking software.

×